RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCOPUS KCI등재

      의약품 보험 급여 및 가격 결정과 경제성 평가의 활용 = Use of Economic Evaluation in the Listing and Pricing of Pharmaceuticals

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101437967

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      To curb a rapid increase in expenditures for pharmaceuticals, the Korean government introduced a positive list system and a negotiation process for drug prices at the end of 2006. Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals has begun to have a pivotal role in the listing and pricing of drugs for the Korean National Health Insurance. There are some points to discuss regarding the use of economic evaluation in the listing and pricing in the context of the Korean system. First, the listing and pricing processes have been fragmented, evoking complaints from pharmaceutical companies and delaying the access of new drugs to patients. Second, there is a concern that the positive list system may limit the range and availability of drugs for patients to choose for treatment. Third, the time schedule for de-listing of existing drugs may not be realistic. Fourth, it is not always easy to provide reliable evidence of cost-effectiveness due to a lack of materials. Fifth, there is no consensus on the range of the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) acceptable to the Korean society. In conclusion, in the near future, it will be necessary to evaluate the achievements that the economic evaluation has provided to the Korean society.
      번역하기

      To curb a rapid increase in expenditures for pharmaceuticals, the Korean government introduced a positive list system and a negotiation process for drug prices at the end of 2006. Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals has begun to have a pivotal role...

      To curb a rapid increase in expenditures for pharmaceuticals, the Korean government introduced a positive list system and a negotiation process for drug prices at the end of 2006. Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals has begun to have a pivotal role in the listing and pricing of drugs for the Korean National Health Insurance. There are some points to discuss regarding the use of economic evaluation in the listing and pricing in the context of the Korean system. First, the listing and pricing processes have been fragmented, evoking complaints from pharmaceutical companies and delaying the access of new drugs to patients. Second, there is a concern that the positive list system may limit the range and availability of drugs for patients to choose for treatment. Third, the time schedule for de-listing of existing drugs may not be realistic. Fourth, it is not always easy to provide reliable evidence of cost-effectiveness due to a lack of materials. Fifth, there is no consensus on the range of the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) acceptable to the Korean society. In conclusion, in the near future, it will be necessary to evaluate the achievements that the economic evaluation has provided to the Korean society.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Drummond, M., "The role of economic evaluation in the pricing and reimbursement of medicines" 40 (40): 199-215, 1997

      2 Huh, S.I., "The policy reform of swedish pharmaceutical reimbursement and its implications" 133 : 113-123, 2007

      3 Lee, E.K., "Policy Measures to Improve Drug Benefit Program" Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs 2002

      4 "National Health Insurance Corporation. Guideline for the negotiation on drug prices"

      5 Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Measures to Contain the Drug Expenditures in the National Health Insurance" Ministry of Health and Welfare 2006

      6 "Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Evaluation criteria of the Evaluation Committee on the Listing of Drugs"

      7 "Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Details on evaluation criteria for the listing of drugs"

      8 Harris, R.P., "Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process" 20 : 21-35, 2001

      1 Drummond, M., "The role of economic evaluation in the pricing and reimbursement of medicines" 40 (40): 199-215, 1997

      2 Huh, S.I., "The policy reform of swedish pharmaceutical reimbursement and its implications" 133 : 113-123, 2007

      3 Lee, E.K., "Policy Measures to Improve Drug Benefit Program" Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs 2002

      4 "National Health Insurance Corporation. Guideline for the negotiation on drug prices"

      5 Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Measures to Contain the Drug Expenditures in the National Health Insurance" Ministry of Health and Welfare 2006

      6 "Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Evaluation criteria of the Evaluation Committee on the Listing of Drugs"

      7 "Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Details on evaluation criteria for the listing of drugs"

      8 Harris, R.P., "Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process" 20 : 21-35, 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2010-06-28 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine -> Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.3 0.3 0.39
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.32 0.784 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼