RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기업 간 관계에서 윤리부조화의 성과에 대한 영향 = The Impact of Ethical Dissonance on Performance in Inter-Firm Relationships

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106986590

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper defines ethical dissonance as the gap between the encoded ethical values of a firm and its managers’ perception of the firm’s actual ethical level, and investigates its impact on trust, collaborative activities, and logistics efficiency in inter-firm relationships. The main research survey included 1,016 questionnaires distributed between October 2011 and April 2012. Managers of large purchasing firms were asked to complete the survey with specific consideration to tasks and relationships held with all of their subcontractor partners. In total, 262 responses were collected. The findings indicate that ethical dissonance negatively affects two trust factors: affective trust and competencybased trust. When managers from supplier firms detect ethical dissonance in buyer firms, they might feel uncertainty in business transactions, which situation erodes mutual trust. Both trust factors have a positive impact on two collaboration factors: task-solving involvement and information sharing. On the other hand, competency-based trust does not affect collaboration in terms of rapport building. Collaboration through task-solving involvement contributes to logistics-efficiency improvement, whereas collaboration through information sharing and rapport building does not.
      번역하기

      This paper defines ethical dissonance as the gap between the encoded ethical values of a firm and its managers’ perception of the firm’s actual ethical level, and investigates its impact on trust, collaborative activities, and logistics efficiency...

      This paper defines ethical dissonance as the gap between the encoded ethical values of a firm and its managers’ perception of the firm’s actual ethical level, and investigates its impact on trust, collaborative activities, and logistics efficiency in inter-firm relationships. The main research survey included 1,016 questionnaires distributed between October 2011 and April 2012. Managers of large purchasing firms were asked to complete the survey with specific consideration to tasks and relationships held with all of their subcontractor partners. In total, 262 responses were collected. The findings indicate that ethical dissonance negatively affects two trust factors: affective trust and competencybased trust. When managers from supplier firms detect ethical dissonance in buyer firms, they might feel uncertainty in business transactions, which situation erodes mutual trust. Both trust factors have a positive impact on two collaboration factors: task-solving involvement and information sharing. On the other hand, competency-based trust does not affect collaboration in terms of rapport building. Collaboration through task-solving involvement contributes to logistics-efficiency improvement, whereas collaboration through information sharing and rapport building does not.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼