‘차이’ 찾기로서의 비교철학 = The Comparative Philosophy for Disclosing 'Difference'

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this article I attempted to define the comparative philosophy as activities to discover a difference of two or three philosophies. And I also emphasized that through actively doing philosophy of the difference the comparative philosophy should be a meaningfully methodological way escaping from the limits of a given locality or time, and clarified that it must be functional as a method constituting a comparative discourse.
In this context, I first pointed out that the various arguments of the comparative philosophy only has been focused on finding a sameness or similarity rather than difference itself. Then I criticized a problem in which our common practice of finding a sameness from the different philosophies has been falling in making harmony of east and west philosophy.
As regards the comparative method of the east and west philosophy a consideration, that is, whether intuition or reason arguments for east and west philosophies, would be problematic. In our country the atmosphere of the studies of comparative philosophy did not satisfy for a long time appropriate conditions for the sound way of comparison; not criticizing the difference of them but depending upon a conventional way of a given matter of course. And pointing out that there were not enough for various and delicate discourses for the comparative philosophy to us, I emphasized many ways of comparison again.
In result, comparison of the comparative philosophy must be a work to find the inner relation of them. For the good comparison, I think, a difference would be disclosed from the philosophies. Concerning the limits of coluturalism a standpoint of a philosophy should be open again to find a universal context, namely, the original right of doing philosophy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이광래, "한국의 서양사상 수용사" 열린 책들 2003

2 박연규, "퍼스(Charles S. Peirce)의 관계(Relatives)의 논리와 범주" 새한철학회 2 (2): 165-184, 2007

3 강영안, "타인의 얼굴: 레비나스의 철학" 문학과 지성사 2005

4 진위평, "일곱 주제로 만나는동서비교철학" 예문서원 2002

5 박연규, "인(仁)의 우리말 번역, ‘사람다움’과 ‘사람됨’에 대하여* - 중국철학 개념 번역의 원칙과 사례 -" 인문과학연구소 (56) : 133-164, 2009

6 이기상, "이 땅에서 우리말로 철학하기" 살림 2003

7 윤천근, "이 땅에서 우리 철학하기" 예문서원 2001

8 황의동, "유교와 현대의 대화" 예문서원 2002

9 이승환, "유교 담론의 지형학" 푸른 숲 2004

10 이승환, "유가사상의 사회철학적 재조명" 고려대학교출판부 1998

11 이경남, "양수명의 직관주의 철학에 관한 연구" (3) : 1999

12 이기상, "서양철학의 수용과 한국철학의 모색" 지식산업사 2002

13 이상임, "비교철학연구" 범조사 2002

14 에임즈, 로저, "동양철학 그 삶과 창조성" 성균관대학교출판부 2005

15 박연규, "동서철학인가, 비교철학인가 - 연구방법론의 양식성과 내재성 -" 동서사상연구소 (4) : 1-34, 2006

16 양수명, "동서문화와 철학" 솔 2005

17 보인, 로이, "데리다와 푸꼬: 동일성과 차이" 인간사랑 1998