채권양도에 있어서 채무자의 상계항변

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Today, the transferability of a claim has been definitely established. The demand of money and an Obligatory right would be one of the reasons to admit the transferability of the claim. In a sense, a claim has no transferability in itself. However, The extension of the transferability of a claim become necessary conditions is not only considered as transferable but also acknowledged as security at present-day. The present study and a(judicial)precedent deals with the cases where the right to protest in the part of transferees is controversial. The issues about the right to protest for the transfer are examined as below in the present study. For example, the interrelationship and interpretation of Sub-Section 1 and 2 of Section 451 of the Civil Law analyzed as a general problem of the transferee's right to protest. And, the right to protest for the transfer and the legal relationship in case double transactions of a claim-including transfer with the establishment of the right of pledge on a claim, or transfer with the seizure of a claim - are examined transferees' right to protest is dealt with when he obtains a claim that is not transferable by a contract the debtor's right to protest. above all. a setoff of the debtor is also dealt with a criticism Uniquely, it is said that a setoff is a device under Civil Code, designed to use the judicial system efficiently, to remove the inconvenience and to spare the expenses of the parties. In other words, a setoff right is, provided in Civil Code, is the typical authority that contribute to such a purposes.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 채권양도에 있어서 상계항변
• 1. 채권양도에 있어서 항변권
• 2. 채무자의 항변사유로서 상계
• 3. 채무자의 상계권에 관한 원칙
• Ⅲ. 양수인에 대한 채무자의 상계권 확장
• 1. 채권양도에서 자동채권의 특수성
• 2. 이의 없는 승낙에 있어서 상계항변
• 3. 일부양도에서 상계항변
• Ⅳ. 파산채권에 대한 채무자의 상계항변
• 1. 파산에서의 상계권 확장
• 2. 파산 양도인에 대한 상계권행사
• 3. 파산관재인의 상계권 행사
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 양창수, "파산절차상의 상계" 박영사 7 : 2003

2 김병서, "파산법상 상계권" 인권과 정의 1998

3 곽윤직, "채권총론" 박영사 2003

4 김형배, "채권총론" 법원사 1993

5 이은영, "채권총론" 박영사 2000

6 서? 민, "채권양도에 관한 연구" 경문사 1985

7 서? 민, "지명채권의 양도통지와 금반언" 고시연구 1992

8 조성민, "지명채권양도와 이의 없는 승낙" 고시계 1994

9 송덕수, "신민법강의" 박영사 2008

10 김선석, "상계의 증명책임 in 사법론집" 1992

11 곽윤직, "민법주해 제11권" 박영사 2004

12 양창수, "민법입문" 박영사 2005

13 伊藤眞, "破産法" 有斐閣 1988

14 星野英一, "民法講座 4(債權總論)" 有斐閣 1998

15 伊藤眞, "民法Ⅱ" 弘文堂 2004

16 ?世?, "合同法??" 法律出版社 2004

17 "史??, ?法??，中?政法大?出版社"

18 近江辛治, "債權總論" 東京:成文堂 2005

19 我妻榮, "債權總論" 岩波書店 1983

20 ??安, "?行跨???中的抵????究" 中?政法大?出版社 2000

21 崔建?, "?????和?抗要件" 政治?法律 2003