RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    국제정치에서 “적과 동지의 구분”에 대한 소고 = 칼 슈미트(Carl Schmitt)의 “정치적인 것(das Politische)”을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76176302

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    International Politics is born with a classification of friend and enemy. This is an undeniable historic fact. This study is reconstructing the division between friend and enemy, which is a reality of International Politics, in a point of view of International Political ideas. The object of reconstruction wil be 「The concept of the Political」 a work written by Carl Schmitt. Schmitt’s work, 「The concept of the Political」 will be reorganized wholly and based on those constituted details the reality of International Politics in the early 21 st Century will be reconsidered.
    Schmitt explains war, nation, the right of belligerency (jus belli) and International organization on the reason of “the Political. “The Political is a two-faced concept. One is ‘Collectivization’ of mankind and the other is that collectivization is divided into an idea of “friend and enemy by the existential standard. By nature human cannot run away from these Political facts. Enemy has a meaning of ‘Publicity’ - hostis - and it is an unfamiliar group which giv? an extreme denial to the way how other groups exist.
    ‘Statehood’ (Staatlichkeit) clearly shows its character when a war breaks out. However, a ‘Total State' (totaler Staat) in the situation of a midway is not a state that can externally prescribe an enemy, use the right of belligerency and start a war. To Schmitt this kind of Total State should renovate itself to a Classical State and the most fruitful means will be clarifying the identity of an external enemy. From the early 21st Century America is classifying its friend and enemy based on “The Political and also welcoming a rebirth in becoming a Classical State.
    번역하기

    International Politics is born with a classification of friend and enemy. This is an undeniable historic fact. This study is reconstructing the division between friend and enemy, which is a reality of International Politics, in a point of view of Inte...

    International Politics is born with a classification of friend and enemy. This is an undeniable historic fact. This study is reconstructing the division between friend and enemy, which is a reality of International Politics, in a point of view of International Political ideas. The object of reconstruction wil be 「The concept of the Political」 a work written by Carl Schmitt. Schmitt’s work, 「The concept of the Political」 will be reorganized wholly and based on those constituted details the reality of International Politics in the early 21 st Century will be reconsidered.
    Schmitt explains war, nation, the right of belligerency (jus belli) and International organization on the reason of “the Political. “The Political is a two-faced concept. One is ‘Collectivization’ of mankind and the other is that collectivization is divided into an idea of “friend and enemy by the existential standard. By nature human cannot run away from these Political facts. Enemy has a meaning of ‘Publicity’ - hostis - and it is an unfamiliar group which giv? an extreme denial to the way how other groups exist.
    ‘Statehood’ (Staatlichkeit) clearly shows its character when a war breaks out. However, a ‘Total State' (totaler Staat) in the situation of a midway is not a state that can externally prescribe an enemy, use the right of belligerency and start a war. To Schmitt this kind of Total State should renovate itself to a Classical State and the most fruitful means will be clarifying the identity of an external enemy. From the early 21st Century America is classifying its friend and enemy based on “The Political and also welcoming a rebirth in becoming a Classical State.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 벤자민 바버, "지하드 대 맥월드" 문화디자인 2003

    2 김효전 역, "정치적인 것의 개념" 범문사 1992.

    3 울리히 벡, "정치의 재발견" 거름아카데미 1998

    4 김용구, "장 자크 루소의 국제정치" 도서출판 원 2004

    5 오귀스트 콩트, "실증주의 서설" 한길사 2001

    6 오스발트 슈펭글러, "서구의 몰락" 범우사 1 : 1995.

    7 어원 스텔처, "미국의 힘 네오콘 NEOCON" 네모북스 2005

    8 Aristoteles, "Politik" 1996

    9 Meier, Heinrich, "Leo Strauss und Der Begriff des Politischen" Verlag J. B. Metzler 1998

    10 Norton,Anne, "Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire" Yale University Press 2004

    1 벤자민 바버, "지하드 대 맥월드" 문화디자인 2003

    2 김효전 역, "정치적인 것의 개념" 범문사 1992.

    3 울리히 벡, "정치의 재발견" 거름아카데미 1998

    4 김용구, "장 자크 루소의 국제정치" 도서출판 원 2004

    5 오귀스트 콩트, "실증주의 서설" 한길사 2001

    6 오스발트 슈펭글러, "서구의 몰락" 범우사 1 : 1995.

    7 어원 스텔처, "미국의 힘 네오콘 NEOCON" 네모북스 2005

    8 Aristoteles, "Politik" 1996

    9 Meier, Heinrich, "Leo Strauss und Der Begriff des Politischen" Verlag J. B. Metzler 1998

    10 Norton,Anne, "Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire" Yale University Press 2004

    11 Drury,Shadia B, "Leo Strauss and the American Right" Palgrave Macmillan 1996

    12 Bobio, Norbert, "Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction" University of Chicago Pr ess 1996

    13 Machiavelli, "Il Principe" Reclam 1995.

    14 Hegel,Georg Wilhelm Friedlich, "Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse" Felix Meier Verlag 1995.

    15 M¨unkler,Herfried, "Gewalt und Ordnung" Suhrkamp 1992.

    16 Ottmann,Henning, "Geschichte des politischen Denkens Band 1/1" Verlag J. B. Metzler 2001

    17 Schmitt,Carl, "Der Begriff des Politischen Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien" Dunker & Humbolt 1963.

    18 Mehring, Re inhard, "Carl Schmitt Der Begriff des Politischen Ein kooperativer kommentar" Akademie Verlag 2004

    19 Kristol,Irving, ",Neo-conservatism:the Autobiography of an Idea" Ivan R. Dec, Publisher 1995.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Studies -> Korean Journal of International Relations KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-12-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Relations -> The Korean Journal of International Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 1.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.07 1.09 1.415 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼