RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    노사(蘆沙)의 기정진(奇正鎭)의 성리설(性理說)을 둘러싼 기호학계의 논쟁 -「외필(猥筆)」을 중심으로- = A research on the Kiho school`s disputes on Ki, Jung-jin`s neo-confucianism -Focus on the Eopil(猥筆)written by Ki Jungjin-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99554590

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    At the end of the 19th century, Kiho畿湖 school notably started to differentiate into sub-schools. After mid-nineteenth century, the specification of Kiho school was accelerated and each sub-schools not only inherited the neo-confucian tradition, but also concretely differentiated their viewpoints on neo-confucianism . Furthermore, the difference frequently induced disputes which were raised by other sub-school members. The dispute in Eopil猥筆 which intensively reveals Ki, Jung-jin奇正鎭`s view on neo-confucianism in Rigiron 理氣論 standpoint, was also raised questions by Yeonjae sub-school scholars initially, and the dispute was spreaded to the whole Kiho school. It was a initial dispute that the sub-schools started to differentiated and this difference was risen to the surface by this dispute after 19th century. Moreover, it had considerably shaped the topography of the Kiho school of 20th century that the confrontations and solidarities among sub-schools on this dispute. Accordingly, the dispute on Ki Jung-Jin`s neo-confucianism, which was one of the main disputes in the 20th century, will be examined in terms of changes and developments of the dispute and main disputing points. By examining the origin and development of dispute, the aspect of expansion of subjects in the dispute will be revealed and the composition of the sub-schools in Kiho school will be confirmed as a result. Moreover, the viewpoint differences in the dispute among main scholars, for example Ki Jung-jin, and sub-schools will be identified. In addition, because the dispute was started and developed as basically Ki Jung-jin`s Igiron was recognized as a criticism on Yul Kok`s Rigiron, the difference in inheritance of Yul Kok`s doctrine among sub-schools in Kiho school can be revealed. As a result, this article will contribute to identify the differentiated aspect of inheritance of Yul Kok`s doctrine among the sub-schools of Kiho school.
    번역하기

    At the end of the 19th century, Kiho畿湖 school notably started to differentiate into sub-schools. After mid-nineteenth century, the specification of Kiho school was accelerated and each sub-schools not only inherited the neo-confucian tradition, bu...

    At the end of the 19th century, Kiho畿湖 school notably started to differentiate into sub-schools. After mid-nineteenth century, the specification of Kiho school was accelerated and each sub-schools not only inherited the neo-confucian tradition, but also concretely differentiated their viewpoints on neo-confucianism . Furthermore, the difference frequently induced disputes which were raised by other sub-school members. The dispute in Eopil猥筆 which intensively reveals Ki, Jung-jin奇正鎭`s view on neo-confucianism in Rigiron 理氣論 standpoint, was also raised questions by Yeonjae sub-school scholars initially, and the dispute was spreaded to the whole Kiho school. It was a initial dispute that the sub-schools started to differentiated and this difference was risen to the surface by this dispute after 19th century. Moreover, it had considerably shaped the topography of the Kiho school of 20th century that the confrontations and solidarities among sub-schools on this dispute. Accordingly, the dispute on Ki Jung-Jin`s neo-confucianism, which was one of the main disputes in the 20th century, will be examined in terms of changes and developments of the dispute and main disputing points. By examining the origin and development of dispute, the aspect of expansion of subjects in the dispute will be revealed and the composition of the sub-schools in Kiho school will be confirmed as a result. Moreover, the viewpoint differences in the dispute among main scholars, for example Ki Jung-jin, and sub-schools will be identified. In addition, because the dispute was started and developed as basically Ki Jung-jin`s Igiron was recognized as a criticism on Yul Kok`s Rigiron, the difference in inheritance of Yul Kok`s doctrine among sub-schools in Kiho school can be revealed. As a result, this article will contribute to identify the differentiated aspect of inheritance of Yul Kok`s doctrine among the sub-schools of Kiho school.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼