RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    企業構造調整과 WTO 補助金協定 = Structural Adjustment and the WTO Subsidies Agreement

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60201559

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The financial crisis in late 1990's has forced many Korean businesses to undergo structural adjustment, and the government responded by implementing various measures in promotion of such efforts. In August of 2001, the Act on Promotion of Structural Adjustment (hereinafter referred to as the "Structural Adjustment Act") was enacted to provide for comprehensive rules on structural adjustment programs. There have been claims from outside that a number of government initiatives aimed at facilitating structural adjustment are in violation of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (hereinafter referred to as the "Subsidies Agreement").
    In light of such claims, the present article applies a legal analysis on whether certain structural adjustment measures constitute violations under the Subsidies Agreement It singles out the Hynix Semiconductor Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Hynix") case, while attempting to maintain the framework that allows a more general assessment of various like measures.
    First, the present article examines whether financial support for the Hynix before the enactment of the Structural Adjustment Act falls under the definition of "subsidies"; whether it could be deemed "specific"; and whether it could be categorized under "export subsidies" or other types of "actionable subsidies". It concludes that, within the factual information available to the author, financial support for the Hynix before the enactment of the Structural Adjustment Act could be argued to have violated the Subsidies Agreement, and might warrant an institution of a WTO dispute or an imposition of countervailing duties.
    The present article then examines whether the Restructuring Adjustment Act in itself and financial support based thereon violate the Subsidies Agreement. It concludes that the Restructuring Act itself does not violate the Subsidies Agreement, and that though debatable, financial support based on the Act does not fall under either export subsidies or other types of actionable subsidies.
    With regard to the upcoming Doha Development Agenda negotiations, the present article recommends to make a proposal to explicitly classify restructuring adjustment subsidies as non-actionable subsidies.
    번역하기

    The financial crisis in late 1990's has forced many Korean businesses to undergo structural adjustment, and the government responded by implementing various measures in promotion of such efforts. In August of 2001, the Act on Promotion of Structural A...

    The financial crisis in late 1990's has forced many Korean businesses to undergo structural adjustment, and the government responded by implementing various measures in promotion of such efforts. In August of 2001, the Act on Promotion of Structural Adjustment (hereinafter referred to as the "Structural Adjustment Act") was enacted to provide for comprehensive rules on structural adjustment programs. There have been claims from outside that a number of government initiatives aimed at facilitating structural adjustment are in violation of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (hereinafter referred to as the "Subsidies Agreement").
    In light of such claims, the present article applies a legal analysis on whether certain structural adjustment measures constitute violations under the Subsidies Agreement It singles out the Hynix Semiconductor Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Hynix") case, while attempting to maintain the framework that allows a more general assessment of various like measures.
    First, the present article examines whether financial support for the Hynix before the enactment of the Structural Adjustment Act falls under the definition of "subsidies"; whether it could be deemed "specific"; and whether it could be categorized under "export subsidies" or other types of "actionable subsidies". It concludes that, within the factual information available to the author, financial support for the Hynix before the enactment of the Structural Adjustment Act could be argued to have violated the Subsidies Agreement, and might warrant an institution of a WTO dispute or an imposition of countervailing duties.
    The present article then examines whether the Restructuring Adjustment Act in itself and financial support based thereon violate the Subsidies Agreement. It concludes that the Restructuring Act itself does not violate the Subsidies Agreement, and that though debatable, financial support based on the Act does not fall under either export subsidies or other types of actionable subsidies.
    With regard to the upcoming Doha Development Agenda negotiations, the present article recommends to make a proposal to explicitly classify restructuring adjustment subsidies as non-actionable subsidies.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 도입말
    • Ⅱ. WTO 보조금협정 개관
    • Ⅲ. 구조조정법 시행 이전의 기업구조조정 사례 - 하이닉스 회사채 신속인수제도
    • 1. 보조금협정상 "보조금"에 해당하는지 여부
    • 2. "특정성"
    • Ⅰ. 도입말
    • Ⅱ. WTO 보조금협정 개관
    • Ⅲ. 구조조정법 시행 이전의 기업구조조정 사례 - 하이닉스 회사채 신속인수제도
    • 1. 보조금협정상 "보조금"에 해당하는지 여부
    • 2. "특정성"
    • 3. 보조금 협정상의 WTO분쟁해결
    • 4. 상계조치
    • 5. 소결
    • Ⅳ. 기업구조조정촉진법과 보조금협정
    • 1. 구조조정법 자체
    • 2. 구조조정법에 기한 하이닉스 지원
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2017-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-06-08 학술지등록 한글명 : 통상법률
    외국어명 : International Trade Law
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.41 0.41 0.25
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.26 0.26 0.508 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼