RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Determinants of Prior Period Error Reporting Types : Focusing on Characteristics of Auditors and Managers

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104750138

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The existing Financial Accounting Standards allow both of error reporting practices: error adjustment to the current period's income statement as non-operating gains and losses and error correction by restating financial statements. In the latter case, fundamental error corrections shall be reported in the beginning balance of unappropriated retained earnings and adjusted to relevant account balances. This study investigates the potential factors that may affect the managements' materiality judgments to report the prior period error corrections, partitioning those factors into qualitative materiality, the managers' and auditors' characteristics. As for auditors’ characteristics, auditor size, audit tenure and initial audit engagements are used to investigate whether these factors affect the reporting types of prior period error corrections and as for managers’ features, income smoothing incentive and conservatism are employed. The contribution of this study lies in the initial attempt to examine interaction effect between magnitude of error and the other factors simultaneously.
    We find that in the case of Big 4 auditors, the larger the magnitude of net error, the more are the auditors inclined to report an error correction in income statements. Moreover, auditors whose audit tenures are greater than 2 years prefer to make restatements when magnitude of net error is large.
    In addition, the higher the magnitude of net error, the more likely it is for the auditors in their initial engagements to report error in the current net income. Our results suggest that auditors consider their reputation on their audit quality and even the possibility of getting supervised by the regulatory bodies as well as the interests of others in their determination process of prior period error correction types.
    As for the results related to managers’ features, we find that if there is income smoothing effect stemming from adjusting errors as profit or loss, managers tend to report prior errors in the income statements, whereas in the case of higher magnitude of net error, managers prefer restatements. In addition, if managers prefer conservative accounting, a high magnitude of net errors is a likely cause for managers to report erroneous accounting in the income statements.
    This study contributes to the literature on reporting types of prior period error corrections by considering the magnitude of net error and influencing factors simultaneously expanding previous studies. Building on the relationship between the material judgments and the qualitative factors, we predict that firms' materiality assessments are associated with the managers' and auditors' characteristics. This setting enables us to test conjectures on the unfolding sequences of materiality judgments and error correction decisions.
    번역하기

    The existing Financial Accounting Standards allow both of error reporting practices: error adjustment to the current period's income statement as non-operating gains and losses and error correction by restating financial statements. In the latter case...

    The existing Financial Accounting Standards allow both of error reporting practices: error adjustment to the current period's income statement as non-operating gains and losses and error correction by restating financial statements. In the latter case, fundamental error corrections shall be reported in the beginning balance of unappropriated retained earnings and adjusted to relevant account balances. This study investigates the potential factors that may affect the managements' materiality judgments to report the prior period error corrections, partitioning those factors into qualitative materiality, the managers' and auditors' characteristics. As for auditors’ characteristics, auditor size, audit tenure and initial audit engagements are used to investigate whether these factors affect the reporting types of prior period error corrections and as for managers’ features, income smoothing incentive and conservatism are employed. The contribution of this study lies in the initial attempt to examine interaction effect between magnitude of error and the other factors simultaneously.
    We find that in the case of Big 4 auditors, the larger the magnitude of net error, the more are the auditors inclined to report an error correction in income statements. Moreover, auditors whose audit tenures are greater than 2 years prefer to make restatements when magnitude of net error is large.
    In addition, the higher the magnitude of net error, the more likely it is for the auditors in their initial engagements to report error in the current net income. Our results suggest that auditors consider their reputation on their audit quality and even the possibility of getting supervised by the regulatory bodies as well as the interests of others in their determination process of prior period error correction types.
    As for the results related to managers’ features, we find that if there is income smoothing effect stemming from adjusting errors as profit or loss, managers tend to report prior errors in the income statements, whereas in the case of higher magnitude of net error, managers prefer restatements. In addition, if managers prefer conservative accounting, a high magnitude of net errors is a likely cause for managers to report erroneous accounting in the income statements.
    This study contributes to the literature on reporting types of prior period error corrections by considering the magnitude of net error and influencing factors simultaneously expanding previous studies. Building on the relationship between the material judgments and the qualitative factors, we predict that firms' materiality assessments are associated with the managers' and auditors' characteristics. This setting enables us to test conjectures on the unfolding sequences of materiality judgments and error correction decisions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 원정연, "회계변경과 오류수정에 관한 연구" 7 (7): 91-121, 1998

    2 손성규, "회계기준서 1호 적용시 중요성 판단의 문제점" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 119-152, 2004

    3 심호석, "전기오류수정에 관한 회계보고 : 기준서 제1호의 적용시기에 경영자의 적자회피 및 이익감소회피 동기" 한국공인회계사회 13 (13): 135-161, 2007

    4 김문철, "전기오류수정손익의 보고방식에 따른 정보효과 차이분석" 한국경영학회 34 (34): 1751-1780, 2005

    5 김문철, "전기손익수정항목을 통한 이익조정행위에 대한 연구: 이익유연화를 중심으로" 21 (21): 123-142, 1996

    6 김문철, "재작성된 재무제표의 정보효과에 관한 연구" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 1-33, 2007

    7 윤승준, "오류수정의 재무보고방법과 주식시장의 반응" 한국공인회계사회 2 (2): 27-58, 2005

    8 김문철, "오류수정 보고실태에 관한 연구" 한국공인회계사회 39 (39): 391-426, 2008

    9 손성규, "비감사서비스 및 계속감사기간이 감사품질에 미치는 영향: 전기오류수정을 활용한 재고찰" 2009

    10 김태완, "보수주의에 따른 회계발생액의 정보효과와 자본시장반응" 대한회계학회 16 (16): 25-52, 2011

    1 원정연, "회계변경과 오류수정에 관한 연구" 7 (7): 91-121, 1998

    2 손성규, "회계기준서 1호 적용시 중요성 판단의 문제점" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 119-152, 2004

    3 심호석, "전기오류수정에 관한 회계보고 : 기준서 제1호의 적용시기에 경영자의 적자회피 및 이익감소회피 동기" 한국공인회계사회 13 (13): 135-161, 2007

    4 김문철, "전기오류수정손익의 보고방식에 따른 정보효과 차이분석" 한국경영학회 34 (34): 1751-1780, 2005

    5 김문철, "전기손익수정항목을 통한 이익조정행위에 대한 연구: 이익유연화를 중심으로" 21 (21): 123-142, 1996

    6 김문철, "재작성된 재무제표의 정보효과에 관한 연구" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 1-33, 2007

    7 윤승준, "오류수정의 재무보고방법과 주식시장의 반응" 한국공인회계사회 2 (2): 27-58, 2005

    8 김문철, "오류수정 보고실태에 관한 연구" 한국공인회계사회 39 (39): 391-426, 2008

    9 손성규, "비감사서비스 및 계속감사기간이 감사품질에 미치는 영향: 전기오류수정을 활용한 재고찰" 2009

    10 김태완, "보수주의에 따른 회계발생액의 정보효과와 자본시장반응" 대한회계학회 16 (16): 25-52, 2011

    11 신호영, "기업특성이 전기오류수정손익에 미치는 영향" 한국공인회계사회 11 (11): 5-136, 2003

    12 황인태, "기업특성이 전기손익수정에 미치는 영향" 21 (21): 177-199, 1996

    13 송혁준, "감사인의 비감사 서비스 제공과 기업의 전기오류수정 사이의 관계" 한국회계학회 33 (33): 77-110, 2008

    14 김문철, "감사의 품질차이가 전기손익수정에 미치는 영향" 23 (23): 1-26, 1998

    15 조현우, "감사시간과 비감사보수가 감사품질에 미치는 영향" 한국회계정보학회 24 (24): 71-97, 2006

    16 Solomon, I., "What Do Industry Specialist Auditors Know" 37 (37): 191-208, 1999

    17 Stice,J.D, "Using Financial and Market Information to Identify Pre-Engagement Factors Associated with Lawsuits against Auditors" 66 (66): 516-553, 1991

    18 Watts, R., "Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards" 53 : 112-134, 1978

    19 Ahmed A, "The Role of Accounting Conservatism in Mitigating Bondholder-Shareholder Conflicts over Dividend Policy and in Reducing Debt Costs" 77 (77): 867-890, 2002

    20 Ball, R., "The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings" 29 (29): 1-51, 2000

    21 Basu,S, "The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings" 24 : 3-37, 1997

    22 Givoly, D, "The Changing Time-Series Properties of Earnings, Cash Flows and Accruals: Has Financial Reporting Become More Conservative" 29 : 287-320, 2000

    23 Ronen J., "Smoothing Income Numbers: Objectives, Means and Implications" Addison-Wesley Paperback Series in Accounting 1981

    24 DeFond, M. L., "Incidence and Circumstances of Accounting Errors" 66 : 643-655, 1991

    25 Myers, J., "Exploring the Term of the Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings:A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation" 78 (78): 779-800, 2003

    26 Kirschengeiter, "Earnings Quality and Smoothing" University of Illinois at Chicago and Columbia University 2007

    27 Chaney P., "Earnings Management and Firm Valuation under Asymmetric Information" 1 : 319-345, 1995

    28 Ryan, S. G., "Commentary. SEC Auditor Independence Requirements: AAA Financial Accounting Standards Committee" 15 : 373-386, 2001

    29 Geiger, M., "Auditor Tenure and Audit Report Failure" 1 : 67-78, 2002

    30 DeAngelo,L, "Auditor Size and Auditor Quality" 1 (1): 183-199, 1981

    31 DeFond, M. L., "Auditor Changes and Discretionary Accruals" 25 : 35-67, 1998

    32 Johnstone, K. M., "Antecedents and Consequences of Independence Risk: Framework for Analysis" 1-18, 2001

    33 Truman, B, "An Explanation for Accounting Income Smoothing" 26 (26): 127-139, 1988

    34 St. Peirre, K., "An Analysis of the Factor Associated with Lawsuits against Public Accountants" 59 : 242-263, 1984

    35 Palmrose.Z, "An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality" 63 : 55-73, 1988

    36 Penman, S, "Accounting Conservatism, the Quality of Earnings, and Stock Returns" 77 : 237-264, 2002

    37 Francis, J. R., "Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism" 16 (16): 135-165, 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-11-12 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한회계학회 -> 한국회계정책학회
    영문명 : KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF ACCOUNTING -> Korean Association for Accounting and Policy
    KCI등재
    2018-11-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 회계연구 -> 회계와 정책연구
    외국어명 : Korean Academic Society of Accounting -> Review of Accounting and Policy Studies
    KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.98 0.98 1.21
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.19 1.13 2.034 0.21
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼