RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    형별법규의 구성문제 = A Critical Study for Formation of Penal Code

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101759272

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper analyzes how modern industrial society expands the extent and range of criminal law through a variety of legislative techniques. Modern risk society has a structure which evokes the constant risk. Criminal lawmakers firstly mobilize criminal law that should be activated as ultima ratio, and raise the level of penal sanction to turn risk society into safe society. Previously penal code was made up of the verletzungsdelikts, but nowadays recently tends to perform the protective function by consisting of the gefahrdungdelikts to intensify the protection of criminal law in modern risk society. This tendency is derived from the functionalization and non-formularization of crimal law. This is why criminal lawmakers criminalize the behavior that can be the source of a common risk in order to prevent real danger more effectively. As part of these efforts, they approve the universal legal interests, and introduce the abstract gefahrdungdelikt widely. As well as these, criminal law is going to expand its field through a variety of legislative techniques. The expansion trend of criminal law threatens the principles of rule of law including nulla poena sine lege, and leads to a crisis in criminal law. On the basis of this critical mind, this paper analyzes legislative techniques such as systemicity, regelbeispiel, abstract gefahrdungdelikt, clarity of legal description, limit of delegated legislation etc. that should be considered when criminal lawmakers enact or amend penal code.
    번역하기

    This paper analyzes how modern industrial society expands the extent and range of criminal law through a variety of legislative techniques. Modern risk society has a structure which evokes the constant risk. Criminal lawmakers firstly mobilize crimina...

    This paper analyzes how modern industrial society expands the extent and range of criminal law through a variety of legislative techniques. Modern risk society has a structure which evokes the constant risk. Criminal lawmakers firstly mobilize criminal law that should be activated as ultima ratio, and raise the level of penal sanction to turn risk society into safe society. Previously penal code was made up of the verletzungsdelikts, but nowadays recently tends to perform the protective function by consisting of the gefahrdungdelikts to intensify the protection of criminal law in modern risk society. This tendency is derived from the functionalization and non-formularization of crimal law. This is why criminal lawmakers criminalize the behavior that can be the source of a common risk in order to prevent real danger more effectively. As part of these efforts, they approve the universal legal interests, and introduce the abstract gefahrdungdelikt widely. As well as these, criminal law is going to expand its field through a variety of legislative techniques. The expansion trend of criminal law threatens the principles of rule of law including nulla poena sine lege, and leads to a crisis in criminal law. On the basis of this critical mind, this paper analyzes legislative techniques such as systemicity, regelbeispiel, abstract gefahrdungdelikt, clarity of legal description, limit of delegated legislation etc. that should be considered when criminal lawmakers enact or amend penal code.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼