RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    기금관리 산하기관에 대한 평가제도 분석 = 정보통신진흥기금을 중심으로

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Government Business Evaluation Framework Act enacted in April, 2006 is aimed at integrating multiple evaluation systems, enhancing self-evaluation of agencies, orienting to performance, and raising availability of evaluation results. This paper looks at evaluation system for Institute of Information Technology Assessment(ⅡTA) which is commissioned to manage Information and Communication Promotion Fund raised for research and development in information and communication technology. As one of non-departmental public bodies, ⅡTA has been under serious pressure by multiple evaluation systems performed by agencies including the Prime Minister Office(overall meta-evaluation), Ministry of Information and Communication(self-evaluation of fund-assisted R&D programs), Ministry of Science and Technology(meta-evaluation of R&D programs), and Ministry of Planning and Budget(management performance evaluation of public bodies). According to the analysis, ⅡTAs load of being evaluated is not still mitigated by the enactment of the Government Business Evaluation Framework Act. This problem will be able to be solved by mutual cooperation among agencies using information sharing system.
    번역하기

      Government Business Evaluation Framework Act enacted in April, 2006 is aimed at integrating multiple evaluation systems, enhancing self-evaluation of agencies, orienting to performance, and raising availability of evaluation results. This paper lo...

      Government Business Evaluation Framework Act enacted in April, 2006 is aimed at integrating multiple evaluation systems, enhancing self-evaluation of agencies, orienting to performance, and raising availability of evaluation results. This paper looks at evaluation system for Institute of Information Technology Assessment(ⅡTA) which is commissioned to manage Information and Communication Promotion Fund raised for research and development in information and communication technology. As one of non-departmental public bodies, ⅡTA has been under serious pressure by multiple evaluation systems performed by agencies including the Prime Minister Office(overall meta-evaluation), Ministry of Information and Communication(self-evaluation of fund-assisted R&D programs), Ministry of Science and Technology(meta-evaluation of R&D programs), and Ministry of Planning and Budget(management performance evaluation of public bodies). According to the analysis, ⅡTAs load of being evaluated is not still mitigated by the enactment of the Government Business Evaluation Framework Act. This problem will be able to be solved by mutual cooperation among agencies using information sharing system.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼