RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인공지능을 이용한 발명의 진보성 기준과 명세서 기재의 문제 = A Study on the Issues of the Patent Law's Inventive Step Standards and Specifications Disclosure for Inventions Using Artificial Intelligence

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110036661

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper examines the patent law issues of inventions utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) in the invention process, focusing on the criteria for inventive step and the disclosure requirements in the patent specification. Under current law, only humans are recognized as inventors. Therefore, if a human uses AI to complete an invention, the AI ​​is not recognized as the inventor. However, if there is significant creative contribution from the human, the human is recognized as the inventor. If a human's creative contribution is recognized, the determination of inventive step should be based on whether a person skilled in the art could easily create the invention using AI. While maintaining the conventional “person having ordinary skill in the art” standard, the human's creative contribution should be considered. Furthermore, if the use of AI is omitted from the specification and the invention is presented as a human invention, this could constitute an unauthorized application. Therefore, the use of AI and the human's creative contribution should be specifically described. Furthermore, considering the “black box” nature of AI and the reproducibility issues, the specification should specifically disclose training data, algorithms, environments, and input values ​​to meet the requirements of reproducibility and enablement.
    번역하기

    This paper examines the patent law issues of inventions utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) in the invention process, focusing on the criteria for inventive step and the disclosure requirements in the patent specification. Under current law, only h...

    This paper examines the patent law issues of inventions utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) in the invention process, focusing on the criteria for inventive step and the disclosure requirements in the patent specification. Under current law, only humans are recognized as inventors. Therefore, if a human uses AI to complete an invention, the AI ​​is not recognized as the inventor. However, if there is significant creative contribution from the human, the human is recognized as the inventor. If a human's creative contribution is recognized, the determination of inventive step should be based on whether a person skilled in the art could easily create the invention using AI. While maintaining the conventional “person having ordinary skill in the art” standard, the human's creative contribution should be considered. Furthermore, if the use of AI is omitted from the specification and the invention is presented as a human invention, this could constitute an unauthorized application. Therefore, the use of AI and the human's creative contribution should be specifically described. Furthermore, considering the “black box” nature of AI and the reproducibility issues, the specification should specifically disclose training data, algorithms, environments, and input values ​​to meet the requirements of reproducibility and enablement.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼