RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      영국의 인권법과 인권기관

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82711511

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      When the Europeans discuss democracy, they start from the history and thoughts of Greece and Rome, and when we talk about modern democracy and especially about human rights, we cannot ignore Great Britain. However, the legal system of Britain has so much complexity that it is not easy to introduce it in a simple way. Generally we call the country the United Kingdom, which includes England, Wales and Scotland, but they do not share the same legal system, and therefore it is not easy to describe the legal system of the UK. The UK we are familiar with would mostly be about England. And this thesis would not go beyond that limitation.
      This thesis is written in order to introduce the human rights act and today's situation of human rights organizations of the UK. By investigating the human rights organizations in the UK that are different in their history and legal traditions from Korea, it is the intention of this thesis to examine the situation of our own human rights organizations from a more objective point of view. Even if the research process was difficult, a fair amount of implication on human rights through the English system could be obtained. This study unfolds in the sequence of content of British Human Rights Act (II), the structure of English human rights organizations (III), and the characteristics and evaluation of English human rights organizations (IV).
      Britain has an unwritten constitution and did not establish special human rights organization that is comparatively familiar to us. That means the common law courts of Britain have operated as the protection organization of human rights. Besides law courts, various committees operate as complementing organizations that guarantee the parliamentary ombudsman.
      The enactment of the human rights act of 1998 was a turning point in the protection of human rights and the development of the constitution, and especially in 2006, the equality act was enacted which meets the standard required by international society. This shows a part of process for Britain to become part of an international society that is healthy from the image of the Great Britain that ruled the world in the past. As not much time has passed since the establishment of the British human rights committee, it is too early to evaluate the outcome, however it is clear that the British human rights organizations are established being faithful to the Paris Convention.

      번역하기

      When the Europeans discuss democracy, they start from the history and thoughts of Greece and Rome, and when we talk about modern democracy and especially about human rights, we cannot ignore Great Britain. However, the legal system of Britain has so m...

      When the Europeans discuss democracy, they start from the history and thoughts of Greece and Rome, and when we talk about modern democracy and especially about human rights, we cannot ignore Great Britain. However, the legal system of Britain has so much complexity that it is not easy to introduce it in a simple way. Generally we call the country the United Kingdom, which includes England, Wales and Scotland, but they do not share the same legal system, and therefore it is not easy to describe the legal system of the UK. The UK we are familiar with would mostly be about England. And this thesis would not go beyond that limitation.
      This thesis is written in order to introduce the human rights act and today's situation of human rights organizations of the UK. By investigating the human rights organizations in the UK that are different in their history and legal traditions from Korea, it is the intention of this thesis to examine the situation of our own human rights organizations from a more objective point of view. Even if the research process was difficult, a fair amount of implication on human rights through the English system could be obtained. This study unfolds in the sequence of content of British Human Rights Act (II), the structure of English human rights organizations (III), and the characteristics and evaluation of English human rights organizations (IV).
      Britain has an unwritten constitution and did not establish special human rights organization that is comparatively familiar to us. That means the common law courts of Britain have operated as the protection organization of human rights. Besides law courts, various committees operate as complementing organizations that guarantee the parliamentary ombudsman.
      The enactment of the human rights act of 1998 was a turning point in the protection of human rights and the development of the constitution, and especially in 2006, the equality act was enacted which meets the standard required by international society. This shows a part of process for Britain to become part of an international society that is healthy from the image of the Great Britain that ruled the world in the past. As not much time has passed since the establishment of the British human rights committee, it is too early to evaluate the outcome, however it is clear that the British human rights organizations are established being faithful to the Paris Convention.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 영국의 인권법 개관
      • 1. 보통법과 인권법의 연혁
      • 2. 영국 인권법의 의의
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 영국의 인권법 개관
      • 1. 보통법과 인권법의 연혁
      • 2. 영국 인권법의 의의
      • 3. 영국 인권법의 내용
      • 4. 영국 인권법과 법제도의 변화
      • Ⅲ. 영국의 인권보호기관
      • 1. 개요
      • 2. 영국의 의회 옴부즈만
      • 3. 영국 인권보호기관의 구조와 현황
      • Ⅳ. 파리원칙과 영국 인권보호기관의 평가
      • 1. 파리원칙의 내용
      • 2. 파리원칙에 비추어 본 영국의 인권보호기관
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • <참고문헌>
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2011

      2 김종철, "전환기의 영국 헌법과 민주주의" 28 (28):

      3 김현수, "이야기 영국사(개정판)" 청아출판사 2006

      4 차동욱, "유럽통합과 영국에서의 헌법 변화 -유럽인권협약의 국내적 실효성 확보 노력을 중심으로" 영국사학회 (24) : 25-50, 2010

      5 국민고충처리위원회, "옴부즈만 제도 연구자료집" 2004

      6 김대순, "영국헌법의 변화: 웨스터민스터 의회는 여전히 주권자인가" 법학연구원 13 (13): 1-25, 2003

      7 임종훈, "영국에서의 인권법 시행과 의회주권원칙의 변화" 세계헌법학회한국학회 11 (11): 119-136, 2005

      8 김선화, "영국 헌법개혁의 추이와 내용: 의원내각제의 현대적 전개" 세계헌법학회한국학회 16 (16): 221-250, 2010

      9 김광수, "영국 행정심판제도의 운영현황" 한국공법학회 38 (38): 159-181, 2010

      10 Vernon Bogdanor, "The New British Constitution"

      1 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2011

      2 김종철, "전환기의 영국 헌법과 민주주의" 28 (28):

      3 김현수, "이야기 영국사(개정판)" 청아출판사 2006

      4 차동욱, "유럽통합과 영국에서의 헌법 변화 -유럽인권협약의 국내적 실효성 확보 노력을 중심으로" 영국사학회 (24) : 25-50, 2010

      5 국민고충처리위원회, "옴부즈만 제도 연구자료집" 2004

      6 김대순, "영국헌법의 변화: 웨스터민스터 의회는 여전히 주권자인가" 법학연구원 13 (13): 1-25, 2003

      7 임종훈, "영국에서의 인권법 시행과 의회주권원칙의 변화" 세계헌법학회한국학회 11 (11): 119-136, 2005

      8 김선화, "영국 헌법개혁의 추이와 내용: 의원내각제의 현대적 전개" 세계헌법학회한국학회 16 (16): 221-250, 2010

      9 김광수, "영국 행정심판제도의 운영현황" 한국공법학회 38 (38): 159-181, 2010

      10 Vernon Bogdanor, "The New British Constitution"

      11 Jeremy Paxman, "The English"

      12 Andrew W.F. Wong, "The Birth of an Ombudsman: A Study of the British Parliamentary Commissioner"

      13 Jack Beatson, "Singh with Stephanie Palmer" Judicial Protection in the United Kingdom 2008

      14 A.V. Dicey, "Law of the Constitution"

      15 David Hoffman, "Human Rights in the UK"

      16 Geoffrey Marshall, "Geoffrey Marshall, The British Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration" 377 : 1968

      17 Joint Committee on Human Rights, "Equality and Human Rights Commission Thirteenth Report of Session 2009-10" 2010

      18 Aileen Kavanagh, "Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act"

      19 Rodney Brazier, "Constitutional Reform"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.48 0.48 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.57 0.57 0.693 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼