RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      생성형 AI의 근대한어 번역 성능 분석 — ≪老乞大≫와 ≪朴通事≫를 대상으로 = Analysis of Generative AI Performance in Translating Early Modern Chinese:Focusing on Nogeoldae(老乞大) and Baktongsa(朴通事)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110100043

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study evaluated the performance of three generative AI models—OpenAI’s ChatGPT-5, Google’s Gemini 2.5, and China’s DeepSeek-V3—in translating sentences from Early Modern Chinese(EMC) conversation textbooks (Nogeoldae and Baktongsa). Evaluation focused on speaker identification and chunking, grammar/vocabulary explanation, idiom/quotation interpretation, and cultural background understanding. Quantified out of 40 points, DeepSeek-V3 scored highest (31), followed by Gemini 2.5 (28), and ChatGPT-5 (24.5). DeepSeek excelled in chunking and translation, possibly due to better access to rich Chinese EMC data. Gemini 2.5 showed strength in grammar and logical cultural inference, whereas ChatGPT-5 exhibited the most hallucinations. The findings confirm AI’s benefit in reducing translation time and effort. However, the study identifies critical limitations: potential errors from limited EMC training data and the risk of subtle, hard-to-find errors caused by hallucination. Utilizing multiple AIs for cross-validation, while acknowledging these limitations, is recommended for high-quality EMC research. This is the first study to review generative AI EMC translation across these diverse items.
      번역하기

      This study evaluated the performance of three generative AI models—OpenAI’s ChatGPT-5, Google’s Gemini 2.5, and China’s DeepSeek-V3—in translating sentences from Early Modern Chinese(EMC) conversation textbooks (Nogeoldae and Baktongsa). Eva...

      This study evaluated the performance of three generative AI models—OpenAI’s ChatGPT-5, Google’s Gemini 2.5, and China’s DeepSeek-V3—in translating sentences from Early Modern Chinese(EMC) conversation textbooks (Nogeoldae and Baktongsa). Evaluation focused on speaker identification and chunking, grammar/vocabulary explanation, idiom/quotation interpretation, and cultural background understanding. Quantified out of 40 points, DeepSeek-V3 scored highest (31), followed by Gemini 2.5 (28), and ChatGPT-5 (24.5). DeepSeek excelled in chunking and translation, possibly due to better access to rich Chinese EMC data. Gemini 2.5 showed strength in grammar and logical cultural inference, whereas ChatGPT-5 exhibited the most hallucinations. The findings confirm AI’s benefit in reducing translation time and effort. However, the study identifies critical limitations: potential errors from limited EMC training data and the risk of subtle, hard-to-find errors caused by hallucination. Utilizing multiple AIs for cross-validation, while acknowledging these limitations, is recommended for high-quality EMC research. This is the first study to review generative AI EMC translation across these diverse items.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼