RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      변혁적 및 거래적 리더십의 효과: 다수준 접근법을 적용한 재조명 = Transformational/Transactional Leadership: Revisit Using a Multilevel Approach

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104094977

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Tak & Jang (2003) studied effects of transformation/transactional leadership using a sample of soldiers in the army, and found that charisma, one of the factors of transformational leadership, and management by exception, one of the factors of transactional leadership, were significantly related with criteria. Since their study had no considerations of the levels issues regarding theory and analysis associated with the examined variables, the incomplete conclusions had room for reanalysis. This study revisited Tak and Jang's research using a series of multilevel analyses such as multilevel agreement, WABA, HLM, to find out which level (i.e., platoon or individual level) is appropriate to discuss the leadership effects in the original research. Results indicated that though individual level effects were similar to the original study, more level-specific phenomena were found from the original research. Based on these findings, implications that overcome misspecification errors were discussed.
      번역하기

      Tak & Jang (2003) studied effects of transformation/transactional leadership using a sample of soldiers in the army, and found that charisma, one of the factors of transformational leadership, and management by exception, one of the factors of transac...

      Tak & Jang (2003) studied effects of transformation/transactional leadership using a sample of soldiers in the army, and found that charisma, one of the factors of transformational leadership, and management by exception, one of the factors of transactional leadership, were significantly related with criteria. Since their study had no considerations of the levels issues regarding theory and analysis associated with the examined variables, the incomplete conclusions had room for reanalysis. This study revisited Tak and Jang's research using a series of multilevel analyses such as multilevel agreement, WABA, HLM, to find out which level (i.e., platoon or individual level) is appropriate to discuss the leadership effects in the original research. Results indicated that though individual level effects were similar to the original study, more level-specific phenomena were found from the original research. Based on these findings, implications that overcome misspecification errors were discussed.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      탁진국과 장종순 (2003)은 군부대 소대장들의 거래적/변혁적 리더십의 효과를 분석하여 변혁적 리더십의 하위요인 중 하나인 카리스마와 거래적 리더십의 하위요인인 예외 관리가 소대지각 요인과 유의미하게 관련됨을 보였다. 또한 소대수준 변인인 전투준비태세에 대한 리더십 효과를 분석하였다. 그러나, 그들의 연구는 관심변인의 이론 및 분석의 수준과 관련된 측면을 고려하지 않아서 연구가 도출한 결론이 조직의 어느 수준에서 보다 적합한지에 대한 재조명이 필요하였다. 본 연구는 탁진국과 장종순의 연구를 다수준 동의도, WABA, HLM 등의 다수준 분석법으로 재분석하여 리더십의 효과를 적절한 수준 (즉, 팀 및 개인 수준)에서 다시 논의하였다. 개인수준에서 카리스마가 유의미한 효과가 있는 점은 원연구와 유사하였으나, 개인 및 소대 수준에서 원 연구에서 발견할 수 없었던 결과들이 나타났으며 이를 통하여 수준명세화의 오류 (misspecification error)를 극복하는 논의를 도출할 수 있다.
      번역하기

      탁진국과 장종순 (2003)은 군부대 소대장들의 거래적/변혁적 리더십의 효과를 분석하여 변혁적 리더십의 하위요인 중 하나인 카리스마와 거래적 리더십의 하위요인인 예외 관리가 소대지각 ...

      탁진국과 장종순 (2003)은 군부대 소대장들의 거래적/변혁적 리더십의 효과를 분석하여 변혁적 리더십의 하위요인 중 하나인 카리스마와 거래적 리더십의 하위요인인 예외 관리가 소대지각 요인과 유의미하게 관련됨을 보였다. 또한 소대수준 변인인 전투준비태세에 대한 리더십 효과를 분석하였다. 그러나, 그들의 연구는 관심변인의 이론 및 분석의 수준과 관련된 측면을 고려하지 않아서 연구가 도출한 결론이 조직의 어느 수준에서 보다 적합한지에 대한 재조명이 필요하였다. 본 연구는 탁진국과 장종순의 연구를 다수준 동의도, WABA, HLM 등의 다수준 분석법으로 재분석하여 리더십의 효과를 적절한 수준 (즉, 팀 및 개인 수준)에서 다시 논의하였다. 개인수준에서 카리스마가 유의미한 효과가 있는 점은 원연구와 유사하였으나, 개인 및 소대 수준에서 원 연구에서 발견할 수 없었던 결과들이 나타났으며 이를 통하여 수준명세화의 오류 (misspecification error)를 극복하는 논의를 도출할 수 있다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 탁진국, "거래적 및 변혁적 리더십의 효과 일선 소대장을 중심으로 산업 및 조직" 47-60, 2003

      2 Klein, "and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass yammari : 512-555, 2000

      3 Schneider, "and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass 91-120, 2000

      4 "and expectations for career success in mentor?prote´ge´ relationships A multiple levels of analysis perspective" yammari : 241-261, 2004

      5 George, "and behavior in groups Journal of Applied Psychology" 107-116, 1990

      6 Bliese, P. D., "Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis." Jossey-Bass (n-independence) : 349-381, 2000

      7 Markham,S.E.,, "Within- and between-entity analyses in multi-level research:A leadership example using single level analyses and boundary condition" 13 : 35-52, 2002

      8 Dansereau, "Within and between analysis The varient paradigm as an underlying approachto theory building and testing and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass & yammari : 425-466, 2000

      9 Chen, "Validating frogs and ponds in multi-level contexts Multilevel issues in organizational behavior and processes" JAI Press Inc yammari (yammari): 335-343, 2004

      10 & Dubinsky, "Using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions" yammari : 787-811, 1994

      1 탁진국, "거래적 및 변혁적 리더십의 효과 일선 소대장을 중심으로 산업 및 조직" 47-60, 2003

      2 Klein, "and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass yammari : 512-555, 2000

      3 Schneider, "and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass 91-120, 2000

      4 "and expectations for career success in mentor?prote´ge´ relationships A multiple levels of analysis perspective" yammari : 241-261, 2004

      5 George, "and behavior in groups Journal of Applied Psychology" 107-116, 1990

      6 Bliese, P. D., "Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis." Jossey-Bass (n-independence) : 349-381, 2000

      7 Markham,S.E.,, "Within- and between-entity analyses in multi-level research:A leadership example using single level analyses and boundary condition" 13 : 35-52, 2002

      8 Dansereau, "Within and between analysis The varient paradigm as an underlying approachto theory building and testing and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass & yammari : 425-466, 2000

      9 Chen, "Validating frogs and ponds in multi-level contexts Multilevel issues in organizational behavior and processes" JAI Press Inc yammari (yammari): 335-343, 2004

      10 & Dubinsky, "Using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions" yammari : 787-811, 1994

      11 Tannenbaum, "Training team leaders to facilitate team learning and performance Making Decisions under Stress" can (can): 247-270, 1998

      12 Dubin, "Theory building in applied area Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology" 17-39, 1976

      13 Locke, "The role of individual consideration and egoism in effective leadership Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations" JAI Press Inc yammari : 85-92, 1998

      14 A, "The folly of theorizing A selective level-of analysis review of the field and a detailed leader-member exchange illustration" & yammari : 515-551, 2001

      15 Conger, "The folly of knowing an elephant by its tail Why the leadership field needs multiple levels of analysis Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations" JAI Press Inc yammari : 77-84, 1998

      16 Latane, "The causes and consequences of social loafing Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 822-832, 1979

      17 Hofmann, "The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass 467-511, 2000

      18 Kozlowski, "Symposium presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology" 2002

      19 Mok, "Sample size requirements for 2-level designs in educational research" 11-15, 1995

      20 Maas, C. J. M., "Robustness of multilevel parameter estimates against small sample sizes" Utrecht University 2003

      21 Bartko,J.J, "On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients" 83 : 762-765, 1976

      22 & Markham, "On the application of within and between analysis Are absence and affect really group-based phenomena? Journal of Applied Psychology" yammari : 168-176, 1992

      23 Zohar,D, "Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety:A leadership-based intervention model" 87 : 156-163, 2002

      24 House, "Measures and assessments for the charismatic leadership approach Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations" JAI Press Inc yammari : 23-30, 1998

      25 Schmidt,F.L.,, "Measurement error in psychological research:Lessons from 26 research scenarios" 1 : 199-223, 1996

      26 Yukl,G, "Leadership in organizations" Prentice Hall 2001

      27 Calder, "Leadership as an outcome of social structure and process" Kent State University Press 81-101, 1985

      28 Bass,B.M, "Leadership and performance beyond expectations" Free Press 1985

      29 Avolio B, "Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations" JAI Press Inc yammari : 53-76, 1998

      30 Raudenbush, S. W., "Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods 2nd Ed" Sage Publications 2002

      31 Raudenbush, "Hierarchical Linear Modeling with the HLM/sL and HLM/3L Programs" 2004

      32 Cook, "Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology" CPP Inc 491-576, 1990

      33 Bliese, "Group size and measures of group-level properties An examination of eta-squared and ICC values Journal of Management" 157-172, 1998

      34 Glover, "Four principles for being adaptive" 2002

      35 James, "Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias Journal of Applied Psychology" 85-98, 1984

      36 Lowe, "Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature" 385-425, 1996

      37 Bass, B. M., "Does the transactional- transformation leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?" 130-139, 1997

      38 Kuhnert, "Developing people through delegation Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership" 10-25, 1994

      39 Ryan,A.M, "Defining ourselves:I-O psychology's identity quest" 41 : 21-33, 2003

      40 Dansereau, "DETECT for Windows User's Manual The Institute for Theory Testing" 2000

      41 Klein, "Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations" JAI Press Inc yammari : 3-22, 1998

      42 Diez-Roux,A.V, "Bringing context back into epidemiology:Variables and fallacies in multilevel analyses" 88 : 216-222, 1998

      43 Bass, "Biography and the assessment of transformational leadership at the world class level Journal of Management" 7-19, 1987

      44 Lindell, "Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test a comparison of the CVI Journal of Applied Psychology" 640-647, 1999

      45 Kim, "And additional view of conducting multi-level construct validation Multilevel issues in organizational behavior and processes" JAI Press Inc yammari (yammari): 317-333, 2004

      46 Kozlowski, "An organizational systems approach for the implementation and transfer of training Improving training effectiveness in work organizations" 247-287, 1997

      47 & Dubinsky, "Academy of Management Journal" yammari : 205-222, 1997

      48 Ployhart, R. E.,, "A multilevel perspective on personnel selection When will practice catch up? In Dansereau & F The Many Faces of Multi-level Issues Research in Multilevel Issues" JAI Press yamari : 165-178, 2002

      49 Kozlowski, "A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass 3-90, 2000

      50 Kozlowski, "A disagreement about within-group agreement Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus Journal of Applied Psychology" 161-167, 1992

      51 Hofmann,D.A.,, "A cross level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behavior and accidents" 49 : 307-339, 1996

      52 A, "? A Multiple- levels-of-analysis reexamination of an Ohio State Leadership study with implications for future research" 111-146, 1995

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-04-17 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology -> Korean Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology KCI등재
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2018-02-15 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology -> Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology KCI등재
      2017-02-27 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.75 1.75 1.81
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.93 2.09 3.578 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼