RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정보환경의 변천에 따른 개인정보 보호 정책의 헌법합치적 본질성 반추 = Essential Qualities ruminated over Personal Data Protection Policy upon Constitutional Consistency attendant on Information Environment Shifts

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recent information environment shifts are caused by common usage of utilization and convergence upon hyper-intelligent technologies, such as AI(Artificial Intelligence) Robotics estimated on GPT(General Purpose Technology) of so-called ‘The 4th Industrial Revolution’, IoT(Internet of Things) linking all everything to internet networks, Cloud Computing as effectual information processing system, Big Data as enormous volumetric information material massively and effectively analyzed, Mobile as information frame like smart device within the realm of possibility in receipt of information and alternating current constantly.
    While the present progressive ICT(Information Communication Technologies) to intelligent information society evaluating ingenuity and flexibility of human being as the point of the nucleus, legislative system of conducting social consensus on the legal issue of the scope of ICT’s decision or the concerned of liability and regulation on controlling the infringement of the human rights and interests by ICT in the era of hyper-connected intelligent information society confronted with feasibleness of substituting for human mentality. In this viewpoint, this article inquires jurisprudential review of the status quo debate on internet self-regulation with regulatory patterns which contain contents regulation but almost exclude structural regulation in coherence of the context as the legal concept of ‘the right to information’, for instance, data protection including information privacy and information security nowadays.
    On that ground, this study investigates the limits of restriction on the right to self-determination of information, in other words, information privacy, and the equivalent law scheme from the standpoint and inquiry of constitutional consistency accompanied by the principle theories and judicial precedents of democratism and legalism on condition that this thesis focuses upon Personal Data Protection Act as the general statues and Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. as on-line law with intent to qualification of looking out over legal thesis on personal data protection policy to deal with this themes. Therefore, the pending problem such as potentialities of identification and of cohesion-ease related to the ‘personal data’ notion, rational legislative prescription on the consent of data subjects associated with personal data process, reorganizing personal data protection regulation structure, and so on.
    Synthetically and consequently speaking, this treatise reaches the conclusion indicating some law-making tasks that the personal data protection policy should head toward re-systematizing substantially appropriate relationship between 『Personal Data Protection Act』 and 『Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.』, concretizing the legal norms constitutional consistently within consideration of guaranteeing human rights to information, and so forth, from the angle of vision of for the sake of harmonizing public interest and human rights.
    번역하기

    Recent information environment shifts are caused by common usage of utilization and convergence upon hyper-intelligent technologies, such as AI(Artificial Intelligence) Robotics estimated on GPT(General Purpose Technology) of so-called ‘The 4th Indu...

    Recent information environment shifts are caused by common usage of utilization and convergence upon hyper-intelligent technologies, such as AI(Artificial Intelligence) Robotics estimated on GPT(General Purpose Technology) of so-called ‘The 4th Industrial Revolution’, IoT(Internet of Things) linking all everything to internet networks, Cloud Computing as effectual information processing system, Big Data as enormous volumetric information material massively and effectively analyzed, Mobile as information frame like smart device within the realm of possibility in receipt of information and alternating current constantly.
    While the present progressive ICT(Information Communication Technologies) to intelligent information society evaluating ingenuity and flexibility of human being as the point of the nucleus, legislative system of conducting social consensus on the legal issue of the scope of ICT’s decision or the concerned of liability and regulation on controlling the infringement of the human rights and interests by ICT in the era of hyper-connected intelligent information society confronted with feasibleness of substituting for human mentality. In this viewpoint, this article inquires jurisprudential review of the status quo debate on internet self-regulation with regulatory patterns which contain contents regulation but almost exclude structural regulation in coherence of the context as the legal concept of ‘the right to information’, for instance, data protection including information privacy and information security nowadays.
    On that ground, this study investigates the limits of restriction on the right to self-determination of information, in other words, information privacy, and the equivalent law scheme from the standpoint and inquiry of constitutional consistency accompanied by the principle theories and judicial precedents of democratism and legalism on condition that this thesis focuses upon Personal Data Protection Act as the general statues and Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. as on-line law with intent to qualification of looking out over legal thesis on personal data protection policy to deal with this themes. Therefore, the pending problem such as potentialities of identification and of cohesion-ease related to the ‘personal data’ notion, rational legislative prescription on the consent of data subjects associated with personal data process, reorganizing personal data protection regulation structure, and so on.
    Synthetically and consequently speaking, this treatise reaches the conclusion indicating some law-making tasks that the personal data protection policy should head toward re-systematizing substantially appropriate relationship between 『Personal Data Protection Act』 and 『Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.』, concretizing the legal norms constitutional consistently within consideration of guaranteeing human rights to information, and so forth, from the angle of vision of for the sake of harmonizing public interest and human rights.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김일환, "현행 개인정보보호법체계상 감독기구 법제정비방안에 관한 연구" 미국헌법학회 28 (28): 219-273, 2017

    2 중앙대학교 산학협력단, "한국의 개인정보보호 수행체계 발전방안 연구" 개인정보 보호위원회 2017

    3 정충식, "지능정보시대의 전자감시사회론" 서울경제경영 2017

    4 한국정보화진흥원, "지능정보사회 : 새로운 기술, 새로운 세상" 한국정보화진흥원 2016

    5 원동규, "인공지능과 제4차 산업혁명의 함의" 대한산업공학회 23 (23): 2016

    6 배영임, "이슈분석 : 인공지능시대의 도래와 대응방안, 정책분석·경제이슈"

    7 성욱준, "스마트위험사회의 정보정책론" 한국학술정보 2017

    8 이재삼, "산업발전을 위한 정보통신기술의 융합 활성화를 위한 제도적 개선방안" 한국토지공법학회 71 : 445-471, 2015

    9 한국정보화진흥원, "빅데이터 활용을 위한 개인정보 비식별화 기술 활용안내서"

    10 채향석, "빅데이터 시대의 개인정보보호 자율규제 활성화 방안" 법학연구원 (85) : 41-80, 2017

    1 김일환, "현행 개인정보보호법체계상 감독기구 법제정비방안에 관한 연구" 미국헌법학회 28 (28): 219-273, 2017

    2 중앙대학교 산학협력단, "한국의 개인정보보호 수행체계 발전방안 연구" 개인정보 보호위원회 2017

    3 정충식, "지능정보시대의 전자감시사회론" 서울경제경영 2017

    4 한국정보화진흥원, "지능정보사회 : 새로운 기술, 새로운 세상" 한국정보화진흥원 2016

    5 원동규, "인공지능과 제4차 산업혁명의 함의" 대한산업공학회 23 (23): 2016

    6 배영임, "이슈분석 : 인공지능시대의 도래와 대응방안, 정책분석·경제이슈"

    7 성욱준, "스마트위험사회의 정보정책론" 한국학술정보 2017

    8 이재삼, "산업발전을 위한 정보통신기술의 융합 활성화를 위한 제도적 개선방안" 한국토지공법학회 71 : 445-471, 2015

    9 한국정보화진흥원, "빅데이터 활용을 위한 개인정보 비식별화 기술 활용안내서"

    10 채향석, "빅데이터 시대의 개인정보보호 자율규제 활성화 방안" 법학연구원 (85) : 41-80, 2017

    11 조택, "민주주의와 규제" 이화여자대학교출판부 2004

    12 고려대학교 산학협력단, "국제적 상호운용성 강화 및 지능정보화 시대에부응한 개인정보보호 발전 방안 연구" 개인정보 보호위원회 2016

    13 김유환, "과학기술규제의 특성과 규제거버넌스(Governance)의 재구성" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) (47) : 239-267, 2016

    14 권건보, "개인정보자기결정권의 보호범위에 대한 분석 - 개인정보의 개념을 중심으로 -" 한국비교공법학회 18 (18): 199-224, 2017

    15 채성희, "개인정보자기결정권과 잊혀진 헌법재판소 결정들을 위한 변명" 한국정보법학회 20 (20): 291-328, 2016

    16 이민영, "개인정보에 관한 권리보호의 입법정책적 연구" 법학연구소 23 (23): 45-93, 2012

    17 권건보, "개인정보보호의 입법체계와 감독기구 정비 방안" 한국헌법학회 20 (20): 37-71, 2014

    18 김일환, "개인정보보호위원회의 역할과 기능에 대한 법제정비방안" 법학연구원 24 (24): 233-257, 2012

    19 이민영, "개인정보보호 전담기구의 법적 쟁점" 법조협회 60 (60): 76-118, 2011

    20 정보통신정책연구원, "개인정보보호 이슈의 지형변화와 국제규범의 형성연구" 방송통신위원회 2015

    21 개인정보보호법학회, "개인정보보호 규제 합리화 방안" 개인정보보호위원회 2013

    22 이인호, "「개인정보 보호법」상의 ‘개인정보’ 개념에 대한 해석론– 익명화한 처방전 정보를 중심으로 -" 한국정보법학회 19 (19): 59-87, 2015

    23 "Working Party on Information Security and Privacy, Inventory of Privacy-Enhancing Technologies(PETs), DSTI/ICCP/REG(2001)1/FINAL, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy"

    24 Jóef Oleńki, "The Citizens' Right to Information and the Duties of a Democratic State in Modern IT Environment" International Statistical Institute 71 (71): 2003

    25 Tuhin Borgohain, "Survey of Security and Privacy Issues of Internet of Things"

    26 Juhi Gupta, "Security and Privacy Is sues in Internet of Things" A Unit of White Globe Publications 2 (2): 2015

    27 "Science and Technology Park of Crete, Privacy Enhancing Technologies : Evolution and State of the Art - A Community Approach to PETs Maturity Assessment"

    28 The National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence, "Privacy-Enhanced Identity Federation, Building Block White Paper"

    29 Manik Lal Das, "Privacy and Security Challenges in Internet of Things" Springer 2015

    30 Brendan Van Alsenoya, "Privacy Notices versus Informational Self-Determination : Minding the Gap" Routledge 28 (28): 2014

    31 Martine Herzog-Evans, "Law as an extrinsic responsivity factor : What’s just is what works!" SAGE Publications 8 (8): 2016

    32 Marie-Helen Maras, "Internet of Things : Security and Privacy Implications" Oxford University Press 5 (5): 2015

    33 Federal Trade Commission, "Internet of Things : Privacy and Security in a Connected World" FTC 2015

    34 Rolf H. Weber, "Internet of Things : New Security and Privacy Challenges" Elsevier 26 : 2010

    35 Dieter Grimm, "Die Verwaltung Beiheft 4" Duncker & Humblot GmbH 2001

    36 Ronald Leenes, "Constitutional Ri ghts and New Technologies : A Comparative Study" TMC Asser Press 2008

    37 Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, "Beyond Privacy, beyond Rights : Toward a Systems Theory of Information Governance" Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository 98 (98): 2010

    38 "Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 8/2014 on the on Recent Developments on the Internet of Things"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2007-05-09 학회명변경 한글명 : 과학기술법연구소 -> 과학기술법연구원
    영문명 : Institute for Law of science & Technology -> Institute for Law of Science & Technology
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.51 0.51 0.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.48 0.42 0.66 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼