수도권 접경 택지개발지구 거주민의 세대별 주거선택 요인분석 : 경기도 남양주시 별내택지개발지구를 중심으로

국문 초록 (Abstract)

수도권 내 인구변화 중에 가장 눈에 띄는 점은 서울시의 인구 유출이라고 할 수
있을 것이다. 특히, 서울에서 인근 택지개발지구로의 주거 이동이 뚜렷하게 나타나
고 있다. 이러한 현상은 최근 몇 년간 계속되어왔고, 이렇게 유출된 인구는 주로
서울과 인접한 경기도로 유입되어 수도권 내 각 지자체의 주거정책 수립에도 큰
영향을 미치고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는, 실제 노원구를 필두로 한 서울 자치구에서
인근 택지개발지구로 인구이동 및 주거이동이 이루어지는 요인을 분석하고 더 나아
가 서울시 인구감소 요인을 간접적으로 도출하는데 목적이 있다.
본 연구는 구체적으로 최근 약 10년간 노원구 인구 감소율이 서울시의 인구 감소율
보다 두배 이상 높아 인구감소 및 주거이동이 심화되고 있는데 “수도권 접경 택지
개발지구 거주민의 주거선택 요인들은 어떠한 것들이 있을까?” 라는 의문에서 시작
되었다. 그렇기에 서울시 자치구 중 인구 감소율이 심각한 노원구와 노원구 인구가
가장 많이 유출된 별내 택지개발지구를 연구의 공간적 범위로 선택하였다.
연구의 방법으로는 질적 연구방법과 양적 연구방법을 병행하여 진행하였고, 그에
따른 별내지구 거주민의 주거선택요인을 실증분석하였다. 변수의 설정을 위하여
선행연구 및 문헌을 고찰하였으며, 별내지구 거주민들에게 방문하여 설문조사를
실시하였다. 선행연구 고찰 과정에서 예비변수를 도출하여 요인분석을 시행하였으며, 통계 패키지 SPSS 18.0을 사용해 분석을 진행하였다. 요인분석 결과 도출된
요인으로 ‘주거환경’, ‘입지환경’. ‘자산 가치성’으로 명명하였고, 신뢰도 및 적합성
검정에 문제가 없는 것으로 판단되었다. 별내지구 거주민들이 생각하는 주거선택
요인의 중요도로는 1순위가 ‘주거환경’ 요인으로 가장 높게 나왔다. 2순위로 ‘자산
가치성’ 요인으로 나타났으며, 3순위로 ‘입지환경’ 요인이 나타났다. 거주민들이 생각
하는 주거선택 요인으로 ‘주거환경’ 요인이 가장 높은 비중을 차지하였고, 세부
변수로는 ‘주택 노후도 등 주택상태’, ‘내장재 등 인테리어 품질’, ‘시공상태 및 외관
디자인’, ‘가격대비 주거면적 만족도’, ‘단지 내 보안체계 등 안전성’, ‘대기, 수질 등
환경’, ‘카페거리 등 핫플레이스’ 등이 있다.
본 연구는 별내택지개발지구 거주민의 주거선택 요인에 대한 탐색적 연구로 요인
분석을 통하여 요인을 도출했다는 것에 의의를 두지만, 세부적으로는 도출하지 못
했다는 한계점이 있다. 따라서 향후 연구로는 세부적인 요인 도출과 연계하여 진행
하고자 하며, t-검정과 회귀분석을 통해 주거선택 요인에 대한 상호관계를 분석하고
자 한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The most noticeable change in the population in the metropolitan area is
probably the outflow of population in Seoul. In particular, even though the
government's public housing policy is expanding, housing movement from
Seoul to neighboring housing development districts is remarkable. This
phenomenon has persisted in recent years, and the outflow of the population
has been influencing the establishment of housing policies of each local
government in the metropolitan area, mainly as it has flowed into local
governments adjacent to Seoul, such as Gyeonggi and Incheon. Therefore, the
purpose of this study is to analyze the factors that cause population movement
and residential movement from the Seoul autonomous districts, led by
Nowon-gu, to neighboring housing development districts, and further indirectly
derive the factors of population reduction in Seoul.
Specifically, this study shows that Nowon-gu's population decline in the last 10
years has more than doubled that of Seoul, leading to intensification of population
decline and residential mobility. It started with the question. Therefore, Nowon-gu,
which has a severe population decline among autonomous districts in Seoul, and
Byeolnae housing site development district, where the population of Nowon-gu is
the most outflow, were selected as the spatial scope of the study.
As a method of study, the study was conducted in parallel with the qualitative and
quantitative research methods, and the housing choice factors of the residents of
Byeolnae district were empirically analyzed. Prior studies and literature were
reviewed to set the variables, and a survey was conducted by visiting residents of
Byeolnae district. In the process of reviewing previous studies, preliminary
variables were derived and factor analysis was conducted, and the study was
conducted using the statistical package SPSS 18.0.
The factors derived from the factor analysis are'residential environment'
and'location environment'. It was named'asset value', and there was no problem
with reliability and suitability test. The factor of housing choice that the residents
of Byeolnae District think is the most important factor, with the first priority
being the “residential environment” factor. In the second place, the factor of'asset
value' appeared, and in the third place, the factor of'location environment'
appeared. The'residential environment' factor occupied the highest proportion as a
housing choice factor considered by residents, and the detailed variables
include'housing condition such as old housing,''interior quality such as interior
materials','construction condition and exterior design', There are'Satisfaction of
residential area for price','Safety such as security system in the
complex','Environment such as air and water quality', and'Hot place such as cafe
street'.
This study is an exploratory study on the housing choice factors of the residents of
the Byeolnae housing site development district, which is significant in deriving
factors through factor analysis, but has a limitation in that it was not able to
derive in detail. Therefore, we intend to proceed with research in connection with
derivation of detailed factors as a future study, and analyze the interrelationships
of housing choice factors through t-test and regression analysis.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 서론 ··································································································································1
• 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적······························································································1
• 1.2 연구의 범위 및 방법······························································································3
• II. 선행연구 검토 및 관련이론 고찰 ········································································5
• 2.1 선행연구 검토 ··········································································································5
• 2.2 관련이론 고찰 ········································································································13
• 2.2.1 주거선택 이론··································································································13
• 2.2.2 주거이동 이론·································································································16
• 2.2.3 교외화 이론 ·····································································································17
• 2.2.4 다양한 세대와 라이프스타일·······································································20
• III. 사례대상지 분석 ·····································································································23
• 3.1 사례대상지 선정 배경··························································································23
• 3.2 사례대상지 현황····································································································26
• IV. 실증분석 ····················································································································28
• 4.1 요인(변수)의 도출 과정·······················································································28
• 4.2 설문조사 개요 ········································································································30
• 4.3 요인분석 ··················································································································39
• V. 결론 ······························································································································52
• [참고문헌] ························································································································54