RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    니까야에 나타나는 무아(anattan)의 용례와 의미 = On the Usages and the Meaning of Anattan in Nikāyas

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106671974

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is based on the result of the search about the usages of selflessness or anattan appearing in Nikāyas with the program Digital Pali Reader. Through this work, I want to clarify what Buddha's original intention was in teaching selflessness or anattan. The common use of Selflessness or anattan is the singular nominative form or the first case which is anattā. In this case, anattā is characterized grammatically as the subject in a sentence, but it is actually being used as the descriptive noun. “Material phenomenon (色) is anattā.” and “Eye (眼) is anattā.” are examples of sentences which use anattā as descriptive nouns in Nikāyas. Anattā, which is used as a descriptive noun, has only a passive meaning or passive voice construction because it is used to deny self-identity.
    The primary object negated by the expression of anattā or selflessness is usually regarded as attā or self. In fact, however, the focus of anattā is not on selflessness, but on denial of identity with ‘I’ or ahaṃ from the five khandas or empirical elements like body (色), feelings(受), perceptions(想), etc. For example, there are many passages that describe khandhas or empirical elements as not mine or mama, not ‘I’ or ahaṃ, not myself or me attā. This study has its own significance in that it identifies that the actual meaning of anattā is the denial of the identity with ‘I’ from the empirical elements in Nikāyas instead of selflessness.
    번역하기

    This study is based on the result of the search about the usages of selflessness or anattan appearing in Nikāyas with the program Digital Pali Reader. Through this work, I want to clarify what Buddha's original intention was in teaching selflessness ...

    This study is based on the result of the search about the usages of selflessness or anattan appearing in Nikāyas with the program Digital Pali Reader. Through this work, I want to clarify what Buddha's original intention was in teaching selflessness or anattan. The common use of Selflessness or anattan is the singular nominative form or the first case which is anattā. In this case, anattā is characterized grammatically as the subject in a sentence, but it is actually being used as the descriptive noun. “Material phenomenon (色) is anattā.” and “Eye (眼) is anattā.” are examples of sentences which use anattā as descriptive nouns in Nikāyas. Anattā, which is used as a descriptive noun, has only a passive meaning or passive voice construction because it is used to deny self-identity.
    The primary object negated by the expression of anattā or selflessness is usually regarded as attā or self. In fact, however, the focus of anattā is not on selflessness, but on denial of identity with ‘I’ or ahaṃ from the five khandas or empirical elements like body (色), feelings(受), perceptions(想), etc. For example, there are many passages that describe khandhas or empirical elements as not mine or mama, not ‘I’ or ahaṃ, not myself or me attā. This study has its own significance in that it identifies that the actual meaning of anattā is the denial of the identity with ‘I’ from the empirical elements in Nikāyas instead of selflessness.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한상희, "초기불교의 중도와 무아, 그리고 공-의미와 관계에 관한 일고찰" 불교학연구회 60 : 1-29, 2019

    2 정승석, "윤회의 자아와 무아" 장경각 1999

    3 김한상, "상좌부의 삼상(三相, ti-lakkhaṇa)과 대승의 법인(法印, dharma-uddāna)에 대한 비교연구" 보조사상연구원 (41) : 287-325, 2014

    4 한자경, "불교의 무아론" 이화여자대학교출판부 2010

    5 임승택, "무아에 대한 형이상학적 해석의 양상들__니까야(Nikāya)에 나타나는 ‘실천적 무아’와 비교를 위한 시론__" 인도철학회 (51) : 101-138, 2017

    6 임승택, "무아·윤회 논쟁에 대한 비판적 검토-초기불교를 중심으로-" 불교학연구회 45 : 1-31, 2015

    7 정준영, "나, 버릴 것인가 찾을 것인가" 운주사 2008

    8 "chrome://digitalpalireader/content/index.xul(https://palemoon.start.me/start"

    9 Rahula, Walpola, "What the Buddha Taught, First paperback edition" Gordon Fraser Gallery Ltd 1978

    10 Radhakrishnan, S, "The Principal Upaniṣads" George & Unwin Ltd 1968

    1 한상희, "초기불교의 중도와 무아, 그리고 공-의미와 관계에 관한 일고찰" 불교학연구회 60 : 1-29, 2019

    2 정승석, "윤회의 자아와 무아" 장경각 1999

    3 김한상, "상좌부의 삼상(三相, ti-lakkhaṇa)과 대승의 법인(法印, dharma-uddāna)에 대한 비교연구" 보조사상연구원 (41) : 287-325, 2014

    4 한자경, "불교의 무아론" 이화여자대학교출판부 2010

    5 임승택, "무아에 대한 형이상학적 해석의 양상들__니까야(Nikāya)에 나타나는 ‘실천적 무아’와 비교를 위한 시론__" 인도철학회 (51) : 101-138, 2017

    6 임승택, "무아·윤회 논쟁에 대한 비판적 검토-초기불교를 중심으로-" 불교학연구회 45 : 1-31, 2015

    7 정준영, "나, 버릴 것인가 찾을 것인가" 운주사 2008

    8 "chrome://digitalpalireader/content/index.xul(https://palemoon.start.me/start"

    9 Rahula, Walpola, "What the Buddha Taught, First paperback edition" Gordon Fraser Gallery Ltd 1978

    10 Radhakrishnan, S, "The Principal Upaniṣads" George & Unwin Ltd 1968

    11 Gethin, Rupert, "The Foundations of Buddhism" OUP Oxford 1998

    12 Williams, Monier, "Sanskrit English Dictionary" Clarendon Press 1899

    13 "SN : Saṁyuttanikāya, PTS"

    14 "Paṭis : Paṭisambhidāmagga, PTS"

    15 "MN : Majjhimanikāya, PTS"

    16 "MN : Majjhimanikāya, PTS"

    17 "MA : Papañcasūdanī(Majjhimanikāyaṭthakathā), PTS"

    18 Radhakrishan, "Indian Philosophy vol.1" George Allen & Unwin Ltd 1977

    19 Shulman, Eviater, "Early Meanings of Dependent-Origination" Kluwer academic pub 36 : 297-317, 2008

    20 "Dhp : Dhammapada, PTS"

    21 "DN : Dīghānikāya, PTS"

    22 Bronkhorst, Johannes, "Buddhist Teaching in India" Wisdom Publications 2009

    23 "AN. Aṅguttaranikāya, PTS"

    24 Hinüber, Oskar. V, "A Handbook of Pāli Literature" de Gruyter 1996

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.49
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.5 0.51 0.714 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼