확정 전 보전압류에 관한 소고 = On preliminary seizure in tax law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this article, author examined Korea`s preliminary seizure in tax law thoroughly. Based on the examination, author suggested the improvement as follows: First, the preliminary seizure can be imposed unilaterally by tax authorities as a administrative measure even when there is a dispute on the existence of secured tax claims between the tax authorities and the tax payers. Therefore, although it has a temporary character like a civil preservative action, it can be imposed without the judicial control. In this respect it can infringe the tax payer`s property. In historical respect the authority to impose the preliminary seizure has not been exclusively belonged to tax authorities. The relocation of the issue authority of preliminary seizure to judicial authorities may be considered as a long-range policy change. Second, the appeal to the preliminary seizure itself or to the refusal to the application of release of the preliminary seizure has to go through the compulsory preliminary administrative procedure. Therefore, once the tax authorities impose the preliminary seizure, the tax payer can not exclude the legal effect of the preliminary seizure easily. This kind of irrationality is maximized when there is a dispute between the tax authorities and the tax payers. The author suggests that the appeal procedure shall be exempted from the compulsory preliminary administrative procedure. Third, when preliminary seizure is released or canceled, the damaged caused by it shall be compensated irrespective of the negligence of the officials. In this regard, the legislative improvement is needed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김동희, "행정법 제14판" 박영사 2008

2 임승순, "조세법 2012년도판" 박영사 2012

3 황남석, "법인세법의 성립과정 연구 서설" (가을) : 2012

4 권창영, "민사집행법(제2판)" 유로 2012

5 김홍엽, "민사집행법" 박영사 2011

6 견종철, "미국 연방세의 징수절차 개관-Federal Tax Lien과 납세의무자의 절차적 보호에 관한 법률문제를 중심으로-" 법원도서관 111 : 2006

7 곽용진, "국세징수실무해설" 법률서원 2002

8 김동건, "국세징수법의 특색: 강제집행법과 비교하여, In 상사법학에의 초대:무애 서돈각 박사 팔질송수기념논총" 박영사 2000

9 강인애, "국세징수법상의 압류, In 추보 조세법 V" 한일조세연구소 2005

10 金子宏, "租税法 (第17版)" 2012

11 浅田久治郎, "租税徴収実務講座 3, In 第二次改訂版" ぎょうせい 2010

12 小柳春一郎, "明治期の国税滞納処分制度について" (14) : 2010

13 志場喜徳郎, "国税通則法精解" 大蔵財務協会 2010

14 武田昌輔, "コンメンタール　国税通則法" 第一法規 1982

15 Watson, Camilla E, "Tax Procedure and Tax Fraud, 3.ed" 2006

16 Lederman, Leandra, "Tax Controversies: Practice and Procedure, 2.ed" 2002

17 Rauscher, Thomas, "Münchener Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung, 3. Aufl" 2007

18 Elliott, William D, "Federal Tax Collections" Liens and Levies 2012

19 Bruschke, Gerhard, "Dinglicher Arrest im Steuerrecht" DStR 54-, 2003

20 Hübschmann, Walter, "Abganbenordnung/Finan zgerichtsordnung Kommentar" 2011

21 Klein, Franz, "Abgabenordnung, 11.Aufl" 2012

22 Tipke, Klaus, "Abgabenordnung – Finanzgerichtsor dnung Kommentar" 2012