RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      韓國의 經濟學 敎育 = On Economics Education in Korean Universities

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3196502

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Economics curriculum in the Korean colleges puts the major emphasis on microeconomics and macroeconomics at both undergraduate and graduate levels. Microeconomics deals with the efficient allocation of scarce resources, and macroeconomics deals with t...

      Economics curriculum in the Korean colleges puts the major emphasis on microeconomics and macroeconomics at both undergraduate and graduate levels. Microeconomics deals with the efficient allocation of scarce resources, and macroeconomics deals with the short-run macroeconomic problems. This feature of the Korean curriculum simply reflects the economics curriculum in Western developed nations.
      It is true that microeconomics and macroeconomics have some degree of relevance to the Korean economic reality. However, the major point is whether microeconomics and macroeconomics have such a large importance as the curriculum indicates.
      In order to answer the above question we must know that is "the most" important practical economic problems with which the Korean economy is now facing.
      It is reasonable to assume it as the developmental problems simply because the Korean economy is a developing one. If it is correct to argue that economic theory should be closely related with economic reality, economics curriculum should give heavy importance on development economics.
      The major reason why theory and reality is far apart from each other in Korean curriculum is that we halve transplanted Western economic theory without much revision and extension with reference to the Korean economic reality.
      The appropriate future direction is that we should give more emphasis on development economics, and increase realism of economic theory with special reference to our economic situations.
      Meanwhile, we may give greater importance on such course as the Korean Economy, and transform the traditional way of teaching into the "issues" approach which deals with the major practical problems with which the Korean economy is being faced.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼