본 논문은 영국의 국민건강서비스(National Health Services)제도가 20세기 후반 보수당과 노동당의 집권을 거치면서 왜 그리고 어떻게 변화했는지를 분석하는 데 목적이 있다. 우리는 공식적으로 ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99531227
2012
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
347-382(36쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드본 논문은 영국의 국민건강서비스(National Health Services)제도가 20세기 후반 보수당과 노동당의 집권을 거치면서 왜 그리고 어떻게 변화했는지를 분석하는 데 목적이 있다. 우리는 공식적으로 ...
본 논문은 영국의 국민건강서비스(National Health Services)제도가 20세기 후반 보수당과 노동당의 집권을 거치면서 왜 그리고 어떻게 변화했는지를 분석하는 데 목적이 있다. 우리는 공식적으로 구별되는 제도 변화에도 불구하고, 보수당과 노동당의 집권 시기의 NHS제도 변화를 관통하는 핵심적 규칙-성취도 향상을 위해 공급자의 경쟁 유인을 창출하는 방법, 즉 ‘경쟁’규칙-이 존재한다는 점에 주목한다. 우리는 노동당 정부의 정책입안자들이 자신의 목적과 의도에 맞게 보수당 정권의 정책 유산을 다르게 해석함으로써 이전 정권과 구별되는 새로운 형태의 NHS운영방식을 산출했다는 점을 밝히고자 한다. 이는 점진적 제도 변화의 유형 중 ‘개조’에 해당한다.<br/>
노동당 정부는 보수당의 내부시장을 폐지함으로써 공식적으로는 전임 정부의 정책을 거부한 것처럼 보였다. 하지만 이들은 내부시장 제도의 골자인 경쟁 규칙은 보존함으로써 근본적으로는 보수당의 유산을 수용했다. 이들은 이전 보수당 정부에서 비판의 대상이 된 서비스의 형평성과 질 저하의 문제를 해소해야 한다는 점을 인식하면서도, 그에 못지않게 효율성 향상에 대한 대중의 요구 역시 고려하지 않을 수 없었기 때문이다. 말하자면, 노동당 정부는 NHS의 의료 서비스의 성취도를 향상시킬 수 있는 강력한 자원으로서 경쟁 규칙을 재활용했던 것이다. 흥미로운 대목은 이들의 수용이 단지 유산을 수동적으로 받아들여 모방한 데 그친 것이 아니라, 동시에 일차의료 트러스트와 규제체계를 신설하는 한편 민간부문과 보다 능동적으로 협력함으로써, NHS운영방식에 있어 새로운 패러다임(“강제된 자기-규제”)을 창출했다는 점이다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This article aims to analyze why and how the British National Health Services (hereafter NHS) has evolved during the Conservative and the Labour government in the second half of the 20th century. We focus on the fact that despite official and distinct...
This article aims to analyze why and how the British National Health Services (hereafter NHS) has evolved during the Conservative and the Labour government in the second half of the 20th century. We focus on the fact that despite official and distinct institutional changes, there is a common rule that continued within these two political regimes: a way for policymakers to create incentives for providers to compete for improving their performance, that is, a rule of competition. We clarify that policymakers in the Labour government interpreted the Conservative legacy differently in terms of their own goal and intention. As as a result, the Labour gorvernment generated a new type of management for the NHS, distinct from their predecessor. This type of management comes under the conversion among four modes of gradual institutional change.<br/>
Given the abolition of the internal market which the Conservative government made, the Labour government seemed to reject its predecessor’s policy. By preserving the rule of competition, which was the core of internal market system, however, it accepted the Conservative legacy. This is because the government not only acknowledged the fact that it had to solve the problem of exacerbating equity and quality of the service, but also considered the public’s need for its efficiency. Accordingly, the Labour government redeployed the rule of competition as a resource for enhancing the performance of providers in the NHS system. It is interesting that the government did not just imitate its prior legacy passively. Instead the government created a new paradigm, that is, enforced self-regulation concerning the NHS management, by making Primary Care Trusts and regulatory systems and by cooperating with private sectors actively.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 윤태호, "잉글랜드의 최근 NHS 개혁" 2011
2 박순우, "이데올로기와 개별 복지정책의 관계에 관한 연구- 영국 NHS의 구조개혁을 중심으로 -" 한국사회복지정책학회 (25) : 363-391, 2006
3 김명희, "의료 사유화의 불편한 진실" 후마니타스 2010
4 박승민, "영국의 National Health Service 개혁과 집권당과의 선택적 친화성, 1948-1978" 정부학연구소 17 (17): 187-223, 2011
5 한동운, "영국 일차보건의료부문 개혁의 경험과 과제:Primary Care Groups/Trusts를 중심으로" 한국보건경제정책학회 12 (12): 55-71, 2006
6 정영호, "미국과 영국의 보건의료개혁 동향 비교분석" 77-87, 2005
7 Bambra, Clare., "Worlds of Welfare and the Health Care Discrepancy" 4 (4): 31-41, 2005
8 Klein, Rudolf., "Why Britain Is Reorganizing Its National Health Service - Yet Again" 17 (17): 111-125, 1998
9 Giaimo, Susan, "Who Pays for Health Care Reform?, In The New Politics of the Welfare State" Oxford University Press 334-367, 2001
10 Economic Team, "UK Healthcare: Sector Outlook, Third Quarter 2012"
1 윤태호, "잉글랜드의 최근 NHS 개혁" 2011
2 박순우, "이데올로기와 개별 복지정책의 관계에 관한 연구- 영국 NHS의 구조개혁을 중심으로 -" 한국사회복지정책학회 (25) : 363-391, 2006
3 김명희, "의료 사유화의 불편한 진실" 후마니타스 2010
4 박승민, "영국의 National Health Service 개혁과 집권당과의 선택적 친화성, 1948-1978" 정부학연구소 17 (17): 187-223, 2011
5 한동운, "영국 일차보건의료부문 개혁의 경험과 과제:Primary Care Groups/Trusts를 중심으로" 한국보건경제정책학회 12 (12): 55-71, 2006
6 정영호, "미국과 영국의 보건의료개혁 동향 비교분석" 77-87, 2005
7 Bambra, Clare., "Worlds of Welfare and the Health Care Discrepancy" 4 (4): 31-41, 2005
8 Klein, Rudolf., "Why Britain Is Reorganizing Its National Health Service - Yet Again" 17 (17): 111-125, 1998
9 Giaimo, Susan, "Who Pays for Health Care Reform?, In The New Politics of the Welfare State" Oxford University Press 334-367, 2001
10 Economic Team, "UK Healthcare: Sector Outlook, Third Quarter 2012"
11 Harrison, Stephen, "The politics of healthcare in Britain" SAGE 2008
12 Mohan. John., "The past and future of the NHS: New Labour and foundation hospitals"
13 Crawford, Rowena, "The changing composition of public spending" Institute for Fiscal Studies 2011
14 Exworthy, Mark, "The United Kingdom Health Policy Learning in the National Health Service, In Comparative Studies and the Politics of Modern Medical Care" Yale University Press 153-179, 2009
15 Terry, Francis., "The Private Finance Initiate- Overdue Reform or Policy Breakthrough?" 16 (16): 9-16, 1996
16 Klein, Rudolf, "The New Politics of the NHS" Pierson Education Ltd 2001
17 Department of Health, "The New NHS: Modern, Dependable" Stationary Office 1997
18 Exworthy, Mark, "The NHS: Quasi-market, Quasi-hierarchy and Quasi-network?" 19 (19): 15-22, 1999
19 Department of Health, "The NHS Plan: A plan for investment, A plan for reform" Stationary Office 2000
20 Bevan, Gwyn, "The Interplay between Economic and Political Logics with Dependency in Health Care in England" 30 (30): 53-78, 2005
21 Hacker, Jacob S., "The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development of British, Canadian, and U.S. Medical Policy" 12 : 57-130, 1998
22 Hacker, Jacob S., "The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States" Cambridge University Press 2002
23 McIness, Roderik, "Social Indicators: Research Paper"
24 Hacker, Jacob S., "Review Article: Dismantling the Health Care State? Political Institutions, Public Policies and the Comparative Politics of Health Reform" 34 : 693-724, 2004
25 Mays, Nicolas, "Return to the Market: objectives and evolution of New Labour's market reforms, In Understanding New Labour's market reforms of the English NHS" King's Fund 2011
26 Hood, Christopher, "Regulation of Government: Has it Increased, Is it Increasing, Should it be Diminished?" 78 (78): 283-304, 2000
27 Le Grand, Julien, "Quasi-Markets and Social Policy" 101 : 1256-1267, 1991
28 Hacker, Jacob S., "Privatizing Risk Without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States" 98 (98): 243-260, 2004
29 Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, "Private Finance Initiative - Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals"
30 Farrar, Shelley, "Payment by Results, In Understanding New Labour's market reforms of the English NHS" King's Fund 2011
31 Dixon, Anna, "Patient choice of hospital, In Understanding New Labour's market reforms of the English NHS" King's Fund 2011
32 Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes, "Paths of Progress in Healthcare Refrom: the scale and pace of change in four advanced nations" 1-52, 2010
33 Rivett, Geoffrey, "National Health Service History"
34 Pollock, Allyson M., "NHS, plc" Verso 2004
35 Harker, Rachael, "NHS funding and expenditure: Standard Note (September 14, 2011)"
36 United Kingdom Government, "Modernizing Government" Stationary Office 1999
37 Giaimo, Susan, "Markets and Medicine: The Politics of Health Care Reform in Britain, Germany, and the United States" University of Michigan Press 2002
38 Streeck, Wolfgang, "Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economics, In Beyond Continuity" Oxford University Press 1-39, 2005
39 Dr. Foster Intelligence, "Inside your hospital: Dr. Foster Hospital Guide, 2001-2011" Dr. Foster Ltd 2011
40 Thelen, Kathleen, "How Institutions Evolve: The Political economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan" Cambridge University Press 2004
41 Okma, Kieke G. H., "Hospital Care in the United States, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, In Comparative Studies and the Politics of Modern Medical Care" Yale University Press 203-243, 2009
42 Butler, Patrick, "History of NHS reforms: A state of permanent revolution"
43 Immergut, Ellen M., "Health politics: interests and institutions in Western Europe" Cambridge University Press 1992
44 Sheaff, Rod, "Governmentality by Network in English Primary Healthcare" 38 (38): 89-103, 2004
45 Le Grand, Julien., "Further Tales From The British National Health Service" 21 (21): 116-128, 2002
46 Walker, Alison, "First NHS trusts announced" 301 : 1347-1348, 1990
47 Lowe, Rodney, "Financing health care in Britain since 1939"
48 Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes, "Dynamics of A Changing Health Sphere: The United States, Britain, And Canada" 18 (18): 114-134, 1999
49 Department of Health, "Delivering the NHS Plan: next steps on investment, next steps on reform" Stationary Office 2002
50 Le Grand, Julien., "Competition, Cooperation, Or Control? Tales From The British National Health Service" 18 (18): 27-39, 1999
51 Propper, Carol, "Competition between hospitals, In Understanding New Labour's market reforms of the English NHS" King's Fund 2011
52 Smith, Judith, "Commissioning, In Understanding New Labour's market reforms of the English NHS" King's Fund 2011
53 Mays, Nicolas, "Assessing and explaining the impact of New Labour's market reforms, In Understanding New Labour's market reforms of the English NHS" King's Fund 2011
54 Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes, "Accidental Logics: The Dynamics of Change in the Health Care Arena in the United States, Britain, and Canada" Oxford University Press 1999
55 Timmins, Nicholas, "A Time For Change In The British NHS: An Interview With Alan Milburn" 21 (21): 129-135, 2002
56 Mahoney, James, "A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change, In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power" Cambridge University Press 1-37, 2010
57 "2010 good hospital guide"
58 문성웅, "2008년도 외국의 보건의료체계와 의료보장제도 연구" 국민건강보험공단 건강보험연구원 2008
59 University Hospital of Leicester, "2008-2012. UHL Health Report. Leicester" 2008
성장기폭력 경험과 성태도가 대학생의 성폭력 가해행동에 미치는 영향 연구
소득계층간 주거지 분리의 거주지역 특성이 저소득빈곤층의 정신건강에 미치는 영향
임금근로 장애인에 대한 차별과 직무만족도 간 장애수용과 고용안정성의 매개효과 검증
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2016-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2012-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.56 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.52 | 1.52 | 2.001 | 0.29 |