RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소득세법상 과세단위에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Tax Unit of Income Tax

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104123077

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The definition of the taxable unit in the personal income tax code and the method of imposing the tax have historically been popular subjects of scholarly and political debate. Both issues have been the subject of renewed debate and changing understanding in light of new scholarship that has introduced theories of family economics and feminism to the tax scholarship. This article provides a comprehensive consideration of an alternative method of taxing personal income in the family that has been implemented in U.S.A. and France. The alternative method studied incorporates two critical differences from the U.S. method of taxation. Under the French method, the tax is imposed by applying a single rate schedule to each family member's portion of the total family income. This article revisits the viability of using the family unit as the basic taxable unit for the personal income tax and comprehensively examines one particular scheme that recognizes the family as the taxable unit. This article investigates the French and U.S.A. method of income taxation as a possible reform model for the Korean personal income tax law. The proposed model would replace personal exemptions, and dependency deductions with a unified method of taxation for all individuals by family or household. The analysis concludes that the French model presents an attractive alternative with significant opportunities for simplification and for accommodation of nontraditional, family-like economic and living arrangements.
    번역하기

    The definition of the taxable unit in the personal income tax code and the method of imposing the tax have historically been popular subjects of scholarly and political debate. Both issues have been the subject of renewed debate and changing understan...

    The definition of the taxable unit in the personal income tax code and the method of imposing the tax have historically been popular subjects of scholarly and political debate. Both issues have been the subject of renewed debate and changing understanding in light of new scholarship that has introduced theories of family economics and feminism to the tax scholarship. This article provides a comprehensive consideration of an alternative method of taxing personal income in the family that has been implemented in U.S.A. and France. The alternative method studied incorporates two critical differences from the U.S. method of taxation. Under the French method, the tax is imposed by applying a single rate schedule to each family member's portion of the total family income. This article revisits the viability of using the family unit as the basic taxable unit for the personal income tax and comprehensively examines one particular scheme that recognizes the family as the taxable unit. This article investigates the French and U.S.A. method of income taxation as a possible reform model for the Korean personal income tax law. The proposed model would replace personal exemptions, and dependency deductions with a unified method of taxation for all individuals by family or household. The analysis concludes that the French model presents an attractive alternative with significant opportunities for simplification and for accommodation of nontraditional, family-like economic and living arrangements.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안창남, "주요국의 조세제도 - 프랑스 편" 한국조세연구원 20046

    2 민태욱, "부부합산과세의 헌법적 문제점" 연세대학교 법학연구소 7 (7): 2001

    3 노영훈, "부부자산합산과세의 위헌결정과 미국의 혼인세 논쟁" 재정포럼 통권 제29호 (29) : 2002

    4 이창희, "부부 자산소득 합산과세는 위헌인가? 헌법실무연구회 제34회 발표회" 2002

    5 Frederick R, "WHICH TAX UNIT FOR THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX? University of Dayton Law Review vol" 1994

    6 Michael J, "Taxation of the Family in a Comprehensive and Simplified Income Tax" 1977

    7 Anne Alstott, "Tax Policy and Feminism: Competing Goals and Institutional Choices" 1996

    8 James J, "Fundamentals of Federal Income Taxation" The Foundation Press Inc 1997

    9 Ayla A, "FRENCH FAMILY TAXATION AS A MODEL FOR REFORM" 37 : 1999

    1 안창남, "주요국의 조세제도 - 프랑스 편" 한국조세연구원 20046

    2 민태욱, "부부합산과세의 헌법적 문제점" 연세대학교 법학연구소 7 (7): 2001

    3 노영훈, "부부자산합산과세의 위헌결정과 미국의 혼인세 논쟁" 재정포럼 통권 제29호 (29) : 2002

    4 이창희, "부부 자산소득 합산과세는 위헌인가? 헌법실무연구회 제34회 발표회" 2002

    5 Frederick R, "WHICH TAX UNIT FOR THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX? University of Dayton Law Review vol" 1994

    6 Michael J, "Taxation of the Family in a Comprehensive and Simplified Income Tax" 1977

    7 Anne Alstott, "Tax Policy and Feminism: Competing Goals and Institutional Choices" 1996

    8 James J, "Fundamentals of Federal Income Taxation" The Foundation Press Inc 1997

    9 Ayla A, "FRENCH FAMILY TAXATION AS A MODEL FOR REFORM" 37 : 1999

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.84 0.84 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.69 0.687 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼