RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      일반계 고등학교 교육과정 평가 방안 = A Study on the Curriculum Evaluation for the Academic High School

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19679258

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study deals with both the theoretical and practical issues of school-level curriculum evaluation. In the former part of the article, the issues of curriculum evaluation in general are being discussed: What should be evaluated in the curriculum evaluation? How should curriculum be evaluated? This study suggests that the R&D mechanism of curriculum, curriculum literature, implementation, and outcomes should be evaluated and that curriculum should be evaluated through evaluators` observation, experts` judgement, and consumers` satisfaction. In the latter part of the article, the issues of how to evaluate the 7th national curriculum for the academic high school are being dealt with. This study proposes for the 7th academic high school curriculum evaluation several selective areas and methods which are expected to bring the most benefits in the present context. In conclusion, this study suggests that the old evaluation paradigm should be replaced with the new one, if curriculum evaluation is to carry any positive influence. The old paradigm of curriculum evaluation is characterized with quantitative methods, outsiders` evaluation, and evaluation for accountability. The new evaluation paradigm carries such characteristics as qualitative methods, insiders` evaluation, and evaluation for curriculum improvement.
      번역하기

      This study deals with both the theoretical and practical issues of school-level curriculum evaluation. In the former part of the article, the issues of curriculum evaluation in general are being discussed: What should be evaluated in the curriculum ev...

      This study deals with both the theoretical and practical issues of school-level curriculum evaluation. In the former part of the article, the issues of curriculum evaluation in general are being discussed: What should be evaluated in the curriculum evaluation? How should curriculum be evaluated? This study suggests that the R&D mechanism of curriculum, curriculum literature, implementation, and outcomes should be evaluated and that curriculum should be evaluated through evaluators` observation, experts` judgement, and consumers` satisfaction. In the latter part of the article, the issues of how to evaluate the 7th national curriculum for the academic high school are being dealt with. This study proposes for the 7th academic high school curriculum evaluation several selective areas and methods which are expected to bring the most benefits in the present context. In conclusion, this study suggests that the old evaluation paradigm should be replaced with the new one, if curriculum evaluation is to carry any positive influence. The old paradigm of curriculum evaluation is characterized with quantitative methods, outsiders` evaluation, and evaluation for accountability. The new evaluation paradigm carries such characteristics as qualitative methods, insiders` evaluation, and evaluation for curriculum improvement.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼