RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    퍼지 관계를 활용한 사례기반추론 예측 정확성 향상에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82496021

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In terms of business, forecasting is a work of what is expected to happen in the future to make managerial decisions and plans. Therefore, the accurate forecasting is very important for major managerial decision making and is the basis for making various strategies of business. But it is very difficult to make an unbiased and consistent estimate because of uncertainty and complexity in the future business environment. That is why we should use scientific forecasting model to support business decision making, and make an effort to minimize the model's forecasting error which is difference between observation and estimator. Nevertheless, minimizing the error is not an easy task.
    Case-based reasoning is a problem solving method that utilizes the past similar case to solve the current problem. To build the successful case-based reasoning models, retrieving the case not only the most similar case but also the most relevant case is very important. To retrieve the similar and relevant case from past cases, the measurement of similarities between cases is an important key factor. Especially, if the cases contain symbolic data, it is more difficult to measure the distances.
    The purpose of this study is to improve the forecasting accuracy of case-based reasoning approach using fuzzy relation and composition. Especially, two methods are adopted to measure the similarity between cases containing symbolic data. One is to deduct the similarity matrix following binary logic(the judgment of sameness between two symbolic data), the other is to deduct the similarity matrix following fuzzy relation and composition.
    This study is conducted in the following order; data gathering and preprocessing, model building and analysis, validation analysis, conclusion. First, in the progress of data gathering and preprocessing we collect data set including categorical dependent variables. Also, the data set gathered is cross-section data and independent variables of the data set include several qualitative variables expressed symbolic data. The research data consists of many financial ratios and the corresponding bond ratings of Korean companies. The ratings we employ in this study cover all bonds rated by one of the bond rating agencies in Korea. Our total sample includes 1,816 companies whose commercial papers have been rated in the period 1997~2000. Credit grades are defined as outputs and classified into 5 rating categories(A1, A2, A3, B, C) according to credit levels. Second, in the progress of model building and analysis we deduct the similarity matrix following binary logic and fuzzy composition to measure the similarity between cases containing symbolic data. In this process, the used types of fuzzy composition are max-min, max-product, max-average. And then, the analysis is carried out by case-based reasoning approach with the deducted similarity matrix. Third, in the progress of validation analysis we verify the validation of model through McNemar test based on hit ratio. Finally, we draw a conclusion from the study.
    As a result, the similarity measuring method using fuzzy relation and composition shows good forecasting performance compared to the similarity measuring method using binary logic for similarity measurement between two symbolic data. But the results of the analysis are not statistically significant in forecasting performance among the types of fuzzy composition. The contributions of this study are as follows. We propose another methodology that fuzzy relation and fuzzy composition could be applied for the similarity measurement between two symbolic data. That is the most important factor to build case-based reasoning model.
    번역하기

    In terms of business, forecasting is a work of what is expected to happen in the future to make managerial decisions and plans. Therefore, the accurate forecasting is very important for major managerial decision making and is the basis for making vari...

    In terms of business, forecasting is a work of what is expected to happen in the future to make managerial decisions and plans. Therefore, the accurate forecasting is very important for major managerial decision making and is the basis for making various strategies of business. But it is very difficult to make an unbiased and consistent estimate because of uncertainty and complexity in the future business environment. That is why we should use scientific forecasting model to support business decision making, and make an effort to minimize the model's forecasting error which is difference between observation and estimator. Nevertheless, minimizing the error is not an easy task.
    Case-based reasoning is a problem solving method that utilizes the past similar case to solve the current problem. To build the successful case-based reasoning models, retrieving the case not only the most similar case but also the most relevant case is very important. To retrieve the similar and relevant case from past cases, the measurement of similarities between cases is an important key factor. Especially, if the cases contain symbolic data, it is more difficult to measure the distances.
    The purpose of this study is to improve the forecasting accuracy of case-based reasoning approach using fuzzy relation and composition. Especially, two methods are adopted to measure the similarity between cases containing symbolic data. One is to deduct the similarity matrix following binary logic(the judgment of sameness between two symbolic data), the other is to deduct the similarity matrix following fuzzy relation and composition.
    This study is conducted in the following order; data gathering and preprocessing, model building and analysis, validation analysis, conclusion. First, in the progress of data gathering and preprocessing we collect data set including categorical dependent variables. Also, the data set gathered is cross-section data and independent variables of the data set include several qualitative variables expressed symbolic data. The research data consists of many financial ratios and the corresponding bond ratings of Korean companies. The ratings we employ in this study cover all bonds rated by one of the bond rating agencies in Korea. Our total sample includes 1,816 companies whose commercial papers have been rated in the period 1997~2000. Credit grades are defined as outputs and classified into 5 rating categories(A1, A2, A3, B, C) according to credit levels. Second, in the progress of model building and analysis we deduct the similarity matrix following binary logic and fuzzy composition to measure the similarity between cases containing symbolic data. In this process, the used types of fuzzy composition are max-min, max-product, max-average. And then, the analysis is carried out by case-based reasoning approach with the deducted similarity matrix. Third, in the progress of validation analysis we verify the validation of model through McNemar test based on hit ratio. Finally, we draw a conclusion from the study.
    As a result, the similarity measuring method using fuzzy relation and composition shows good forecasting performance compared to the similarity measuring method using binary logic for similarity measurement between two symbolic data. But the results of the analysis are not statistically significant in forecasting performance among the types of fuzzy composition. The contributions of this study are as follows. We propose another methodology that fuzzy relation and fuzzy composition could be applied for the similarity measurement between two symbolic data. That is the most important factor to build case-based reasoning model.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Li, J., "new algorithm for minimizing a linear objective function subject to a system of fuzzy relation equations with max-product composition" 2 : 249-267, 2010

    2 Zadeh, L. A., "The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning-III" 9 : 43-80, 1975

    3 Zadeh, L. A., "The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning-II" 8 : 301-357, 1975

    4 Zadeh, L. A., "The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning-I" 8 : 199-249, 1975

    5 Khorram, E., "Solving nonlinear optimization problems subjected to fuzzy relation equation constraints with max–average composition using a modified genetic algorithm" 55 : 1-14, 2008

    6 Fang, S. C., "Solving Fuzzy Relations Equation with a Linear Objective Function" 7 : 89-101, 1999

    7 Burkhard, H. D., "Similarity and Distance in Casebased Reasoning" 47 : 201-215, 2001

    8 Hsu, C., "Predicting Information Systems Outsourcing Success Using a Hierarchical Design of Case-based Reasoning" 26 : 435-441, 2004

    9 Shin, K. S., "Optimization of Symbolic Similarity by Genetic Algorithm for Case Based Approach to Corporate Bond Rating" 2004

    10 Loetamonphong, J., "Optimization of Fuzzy Relation Equation with Maxproduct Composition" 118 : 509-517, 2001

    1 Li, J., "new algorithm for minimizing a linear objective function subject to a system of fuzzy relation equations with max-product composition" 2 : 249-267, 2010

    2 Zadeh, L. A., "The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning-III" 9 : 43-80, 1975

    3 Zadeh, L. A., "The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning-II" 8 : 301-357, 1975

    4 Zadeh, L. A., "The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning-I" 8 : 199-249, 1975

    5 Khorram, E., "Solving nonlinear optimization problems subjected to fuzzy relation equation constraints with max–average composition using a modified genetic algorithm" 55 : 1-14, 2008

    6 Fang, S. C., "Solving Fuzzy Relations Equation with a Linear Objective Function" 7 : 89-101, 1999

    7 Burkhard, H. D., "Similarity and Distance in Casebased Reasoning" 47 : 201-215, 2001

    8 Hsu, C., "Predicting Information Systems Outsourcing Success Using a Hierarchical Design of Case-based Reasoning" 26 : 435-441, 2004

    9 Shin, K. S., "Optimization of Symbolic Similarity by Genetic Algorithm for Case Based Approach to Corporate Bond Rating" 2004

    10 Loetamonphong, J., "Optimization of Fuzzy Relation Equation with Maxproduct Composition" 118 : 509-517, 2001

    11 Wu, Y., "One Simple Procedure to Finding the Best Approximate Solution for a Particular Fuzzy Relational Equation with Max-min Composition" 141-144, 2010

    12 Lin. J., "On the relation between fuzzy max-Archimedean t-norm relational equations and the covering problem" 160 : 2328-2344, 2009

    13 Markowskii, A. V., "On the Relation between Equations with Max-product Composition and the Covering Problem" 153 : 261-273, 2005

    14 Kosko, B., "Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems" Prentice-Hall 1991

    15 Khorram, E., "Multi-objective optimization problems with Fuzzy relation equation constraints regarding max-average composition" 49 : 856-867, 2009

    16 Dorsey, D. W., "Mathematical Modeling of Decision Making : A Soft and Fuzzy Approach to Capturing Hard Decision" 45 (45): 117-135, 2003

    17 Li, L. L. X., "Knowledge-based Problem Solving : An Approach to Heath Assessment" 16 : 33-42, 1999

    18 Riesbeck, C. K., "Inside Case-Based Reasoning" Lawrence Eribaum Associates 1989

    19 Ghodousian, A., "Fuzzy linear optimization in the presence of the fuzzy relation inequality constraints with max–min composition" 178 : 501-519, 2008

    20 Zadeh, L. A., "Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility" 1 : 3-28, 1978

    21 Alliger, G. M., "Fuzzy Sets and Personnel Selection : Discussion and an Application" 66 (66): 163-169, 1993

    22 Ross, T. J., "Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications" John Wiley 2004

    23 McLachlan, G., "Discriminant Analysis And Statistical Pattern Recognition" John Wiley and Sons Inc 2004

    24 Amen, R., "Case-based Reasoning As a Tool for Materials Selection" 22 : 353-358, 2001

    25 Kolodner, J. L., "Case-based Reasoning" 7 (7): 5-6, 1992

    26 Wang, Z., "Case Representation and Similarity in High-speed Machining" 43 : 1347-1353, 2003

    27 Brown, C. E., "Applying Casebased Reasoning to the Accounting Domain" 3 : 205-221, 1994

    28 Watson, I., "Applying Case-Based Reasoning : Techniques for Enterprise Systems" Morgan Kaufman Publishers 1997

    29 Barletta, R., "An Introduction to Case-based Reasoning" 6 (6): 42-49, 1991

    30 Pires, G., "A Wheelchair Steered through Voice Commands and Assisted by a Reactive Fuzzy Logic Controller" 34 (34): 301-314, 2002

    31 Gardingen, D., "A Web Based CBR System for Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems Sales Support" 12 : 207-214, 1999

    32 Wang, H. F., "A Multiple-objectives Mathematical Programming Problem with Fuzzy Relation Constraints" 4 : 23-35, 1995

    33 Suh, M. S., "A Case-based Expert System Approach for Quality Design" 15 : 181-190, 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-03-25 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Intelligent Information Systems Society KCI등재
    2015-03-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-02-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국지능정보시스템학회 논문지 -> 지능정보연구 KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.51 1.51 1.99
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.78 1.54 2.674 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼