RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국의 의료비 부정청구 방지법제에 관한 고찰

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99743065

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since its inception in 1863, the federal False Claims Act(the “Act”) has included provisions whereby citizens can assist in the detection and enforcement of frauds against the government. To increase fraud recoveries, the Act authorizes private citizens(“relators”) to sue on behalf of the government(“qui tam” lawsuits) when they detect a fraud that is not already the subject of a federal enforcement action.
    Periodically, Congress has adjusted the Act’s qui tam provisions in order to balance its dual goals of creating, on the one hand, sufficient incentives for private parties to detect and pursue frauds, but to discourage, on the other hand, qui tam actions where the federal government already has the ability to discover and prosecute the fraud on its own. Over the years, Congress aimed to attain the “golden mean”--an equitable balance between encouraging private fraud detection that increases federal fraud recoveries but discouraging “parasitic” qui tam actions where the relator merely asserts fraud claims that have already been made public.
    The most recent adjustments to the qui tam provisions of the Act occurred with the enactment of health reform, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Amidst a national recession that ballooned the ranks of the uninsured and reports of rampant health care frauds that were robbing millions of dollars from federal health care programs, Congress sought to expand incentives for private citizens to detect and report health care frauds.
    And for two of its almost three decades, the Medicare antikickback law(now applicable to nearly all federal health care programs) served as an allegory concerning the punishment of truly corrupt behavior, such as naked bribes or kickbacks in exchange for patient referrals. Other part saw the Department of Health and Human Services’s(DHHS’s) Office of Inspector General(OIG) boldly staking out new territory in a series of “safe harbor” regulations, special fraud alerts, indictments, and enforcement proceedings.
    This Article will examine the purposes and history of the antikickback law and describes its evolution into a potent weapon against the corruption of medical decision making in the procurement of prescription drugs and medical devices. The article also details these recent amendments to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, focusing on the enormous expansion of relators’ ability to commence qui tam actions, and changes to the qui tam bar that are likely to result. While the purposes of the law are laudable, its current broad interpretation may impede not only corruption, but also benign forms of customer relations and innovative approaches to cost-effective medical care.
    번역하기

    Since its inception in 1863, the federal False Claims Act(the “Act”) has included provisions whereby citizens can assist in the detection and enforcement of frauds against the government. To increase fraud recoveries, the Act authorizes private ci...

    Since its inception in 1863, the federal False Claims Act(the “Act”) has included provisions whereby citizens can assist in the detection and enforcement of frauds against the government. To increase fraud recoveries, the Act authorizes private citizens(“relators”) to sue on behalf of the government(“qui tam” lawsuits) when they detect a fraud that is not already the subject of a federal enforcement action.
    Periodically, Congress has adjusted the Act’s qui tam provisions in order to balance its dual goals of creating, on the one hand, sufficient incentives for private parties to detect and pursue frauds, but to discourage, on the other hand, qui tam actions where the federal government already has the ability to discover and prosecute the fraud on its own. Over the years, Congress aimed to attain the “golden mean”--an equitable balance between encouraging private fraud detection that increases federal fraud recoveries but discouraging “parasitic” qui tam actions where the relator merely asserts fraud claims that have already been made public.
    The most recent adjustments to the qui tam provisions of the Act occurred with the enactment of health reform, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Amidst a national recession that ballooned the ranks of the uninsured and reports of rampant health care frauds that were robbing millions of dollars from federal health care programs, Congress sought to expand incentives for private citizens to detect and report health care frauds.
    And for two of its almost three decades, the Medicare antikickback law(now applicable to nearly all federal health care programs) served as an allegory concerning the punishment of truly corrupt behavior, such as naked bribes or kickbacks in exchange for patient referrals. Other part saw the Department of Health and Human Services’s(DHHS’s) Office of Inspector General(OIG) boldly staking out new territory in a series of “safe harbor” regulations, special fraud alerts, indictments, and enforcement proceedings.
    This Article will examine the purposes and history of the antikickback law and describes its evolution into a potent weapon against the corruption of medical decision making in the procurement of prescription drugs and medical devices. The article also details these recent amendments to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, focusing on the enormous expansion of relators’ ability to commence qui tam actions, and changes to the qui tam bar that are likely to result. While the purposes of the law are laudable, its current broad interpretation may impede not only corruption, but also benign forms of customer relations and innovative approaches to cost-effective medical care.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김운묵, "미국 공적보험에서의 진료비 부정청구와 법적대응" 한국사법행정학회 3 (3): 2002

    2 황만성, "공보험범죄의 실태와 대책" 한국형사정책연구원 2003

    3 박민영, "醫療費虛僞請求에 대한 私人의 代行(qui tam) 訴訟에 관한 硏究― 특히, 美國의 聯邦虛僞請求法을 中心으로 ―" 한국공법학회 35 (35): 319-343, 2007

    4 "http://www.taf.org/whistle253.htm"

    5 "http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/January/11-asg-094.html"

    6 "http://www.factsforhealthcare.com/whitepaper/HealthcareWaste.pdf"

    7 "http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ActuarialStudies/downloads/Last_Year_of_Life.pdf"

    8 Robert Kelly, "White Paper: Where Can $700 Billion in Waste Be Cut Annually From the U.S. Healthcare System?, at 21"

    9 Joan H. Krause, "Twenty-Five Years Of Health LawThrough The Lens Of The Civil False Claims Act" 19 : 13-, 2010

    10 Richard Doan, "The False Claims Act & The Eroding Scienter In Healthcare Fraud Litigation" 20 (20): 49-224, 2011

    1 김운묵, "미국 공적보험에서의 진료비 부정청구와 법적대응" 한국사법행정학회 3 (3): 2002

    2 황만성, "공보험범죄의 실태와 대책" 한국형사정책연구원 2003

    3 박민영, "醫療費虛僞請求에 대한 私人의 代行(qui tam) 訴訟에 관한 硏究― 특히, 美國의 聯邦虛僞請求法을 中心으로 ―" 한국공법학회 35 (35): 319-343, 2007

    4 "http://www.taf.org/whistle253.htm"

    5 "http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/January/11-asg-094.html"

    6 "http://www.factsforhealthcare.com/whitepaper/HealthcareWaste.pdf"

    7 "http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ActuarialStudies/downloads/Last_Year_of_Life.pdf"

    8 Robert Kelly, "White Paper: Where Can $700 Billion in Waste Be Cut Annually From the U.S. Healthcare System?, at 21"

    9 Joan H. Krause, "Twenty-Five Years Of Health LawThrough The Lens Of The Civil False Claims Act" 19 : 13-, 2010

    10 Richard Doan, "The False Claims Act & The Eroding Scienter In Healthcare Fraud Litigation" 20 (20): 49-224, 2011

    11 Stephanie L. Trunk, "Sounding the Death Toll for Health Care Providers: How the Civil False Claims Act Has a Punitive Effect and Why the Act Warrants Reform of Its Damages and Penalties Provision" 71 : 159-, 2003

    12 Michelle M. Mello, "Shifting Terrain in the Regulation of Off-Label Promotion of harmaceuticals" 360 : 1557-, 2009

    13 Vicki W. Girard, "Punishing Pharmaceutical Companies for Unlawful Promotion of Approved Drugs: Why the False Claims Act is the Wrong Rx" 12 : 119-, 2009

    14 Am. Med. Ass'n, "New Clarification by the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of Guideline 1"

    15 Maxwell J. Mehlman, "Medical Practice Guidelins As Malpractice Safe Harbors: Illusion Or Deceit?" 40 (40): 286-, 2012

    16 Steve Calfo, "Last Year of Life Study, Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid Servs"

    17 Pfizer Settles, "Largest False Claims Act Case Ever"

    18 Thomas N. Bulleit, Jr, "Kickbacks, Courtesies Or Cost-Effectiveness?: Application of The Medicare Antikickback Law To The Marketig & Promotional Practices Of Drug And Medical Device Manufacturers" 54 : 279-, 1999

    19 Cigna Healthcare, "Jurisdiction C Supplier Manual: Chapter 14- Fraud and Abuse 2-3"

    20 Robert Fabrikant, "Health Care Fraud: Enforcement and Compliance 1-10"

    21 Hoyt W. Torras, "Health Care Fraud and Abuse: A Physician's Guide to Compliance 22"

    22 U.S. Dep't of Health, "Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2011 10-11" 2012

    23 Kristin McCreary Eichel, "Focusing On Fraud: The Fedral Government Expands Its Use Of The False Claims Act To Police Off-Label Pharmaceutical Promotion" 8 : 399-, 2010

    24 Hampton, "Experts Weigh in on Promotion, Prescription of Off-Label Drugs" 297 : 683-, 2007

    25 Arthur Nussbaum, "Comment: Can Congress Make You Buy Health Insurance?: The Affordable Care Act, National Health Care Reform, And The Constitutionality Of The Individual Mandate" 50 : 411-, 2012

    26 John T. Boese, "Civil False Claims and Qui Tam Actions 1-40 vol. 1" Aspen Publishers 2008

    27 Tauny L. Histed, "Casenote, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens: The Decreased Effectiveness of the Qui Tam Action" 2001 : 161-, 2001

    28 The American Medical Association's Physician's Current Procedural Terminology(CPT), "CMS, Medicare Claims Processing Manual: Chapter 23- Fee Schedule Administration and Coding Requirements 26"

    29 Earl D. Hoffman, Jr., "Brief Summaries of Medicare & Medicaid: Title XVIII and Title XIX of the Social Security Act 5"

    30 Michael J. Andersen, "Bound Guidance: FDA Rulemaking for Off-Label Pharmaceutical Drug Marketing" 60 : 531-, 2010

    31 John M. Degnan, "Avoiding Health Care Qui Tam Actions" 74 : 385-, 2007

    32 Michael A. Igel, "A Perfect 10: The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 Provides Incentive for Florida to Amend Its Own False Claims Act Legislation" 81 : 23-, 2007

    33 Daniel R. Levinson, "A New Era Of Medicare Oversight" 15 : 249-, 2012

    34 최찬호, "1960년대 이후, 미국 의료사의 변천과 개혁" 역사문화연구소 42 (42): 213-248, 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-05-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 미국헌법연구
    외국어명 : Study on The American Constitution
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.68 0.68 0.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.73 0.72 0.798 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼