RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      미군정기 中央經濟委員會(1946~1948)의 조직과 활동 = The Organization and Activities of the National Economic Board(1946∼1948) under the U.S. Army Military Government in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104574250

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The National Economic Board(NEB) was the top legislative organ which supervised an economic policy and a national budget of the South Korea under the U.S. Army Military Government in Korea (USAMGIK). The NEB had a highest authority over an economic policy of the South Korea. It deliberated various national issues and suggested advices about the issues to the Governor of USAMGIK. The organization of the NEB and the changes of its system can be a specific case of a typical reorganization process of an administrative organization in USAMGIK and ‘the Koreanization policy’ of USAMGIK. Therefore, the analysis of the NEB will provide us a clue that will help us to understand an economic policy of USAMGIK and to examine conditions of national administration of USAMGIK.
      This study aims to elucidate a nature of the NEB and its economic policies by analyzing circumstances surrounding the establishment and organization of the NEB as well as its activities. The NEB replaced the Planning Section of the Secretariat of the Japanese colonial government in Korea and the ministry of secretariat of USAMGIK. The NEB supervised an economic policy of USAMGIK as the ‘supreme agency’ in the government. The NEB had a great influence on various economic issues of the South Korea.
      The fact that the NEB deliberated a national budget and budgets of departments in the government proves that the NEB had the highest authority on economic issues in USAMGIK. It had a bigger influence on deliberation of a national budget than the South Korea Interim Legislation Assembly(SKILA) did. SKILA was the legislature at the time.
      The goal of an economic policy of the NEB was to help USAMGIK administration and to stabilize the South Korean society. For example, the NEB made and conducted an inflation control policy to accomplish the goal above. All economic policies which were made and conducted by the NEB were based on the same goal. A trade policy was conducted to make up for a shortage of materials. A wage policy was focused on ‘hold the line policy’ which was conducted to control the amount of currency in circulation. When the wage policy caused a public conflict, the NEB conducted a wage control policy to resolve a conflict. A mining policy which was closely related to a domestic production didn’t aim to increase and actual production. The NEB collected and arranged statistical data about economic issues of the South Korea in consideration of an economic relation between the South Korea and the United States after USAMGIK hand over the power to the South Korean government. Conduct of said works was also related to an establishment of economic policies of USAMGIK but it was mainly to help the South Korean government establish its own economic policies after USAMGIK hand over the power.
      번역하기

      The National Economic Board(NEB) was the top legislative organ which supervised an economic policy and a national budget of the South Korea under the U.S. Army Military Government in Korea (USAMGIK). The NEB had a highest authority over an economic po...

      The National Economic Board(NEB) was the top legislative organ which supervised an economic policy and a national budget of the South Korea under the U.S. Army Military Government in Korea (USAMGIK). The NEB had a highest authority over an economic policy of the South Korea. It deliberated various national issues and suggested advices about the issues to the Governor of USAMGIK. The organization of the NEB and the changes of its system can be a specific case of a typical reorganization process of an administrative organization in USAMGIK and ‘the Koreanization policy’ of USAMGIK. Therefore, the analysis of the NEB will provide us a clue that will help us to understand an economic policy of USAMGIK and to examine conditions of national administration of USAMGIK.
      This study aims to elucidate a nature of the NEB and its economic policies by analyzing circumstances surrounding the establishment and organization of the NEB as well as its activities. The NEB replaced the Planning Section of the Secretariat of the Japanese colonial government in Korea and the ministry of secretariat of USAMGIK. The NEB supervised an economic policy of USAMGIK as the ‘supreme agency’ in the government. The NEB had a great influence on various economic issues of the South Korea.
      The fact that the NEB deliberated a national budget and budgets of departments in the government proves that the NEB had the highest authority on economic issues in USAMGIK. It had a bigger influence on deliberation of a national budget than the South Korea Interim Legislation Assembly(SKILA) did. SKILA was the legislature at the time.
      The goal of an economic policy of the NEB was to help USAMGIK administration and to stabilize the South Korean society. For example, the NEB made and conducted an inflation control policy to accomplish the goal above. All economic policies which were made and conducted by the NEB were based on the same goal. A trade policy was conducted to make up for a shortage of materials. A wage policy was focused on ‘hold the line policy’ which was conducted to control the amount of currency in circulation. When the wage policy caused a public conflict, the NEB conducted a wage control policy to resolve a conflict. A mining policy which was closely related to a domestic production didn’t aim to increase and actual production. The NEB collected and arranged statistical data about economic issues of the South Korea in consideration of an economic relation between the South Korea and the United States after USAMGIK hand over the power to the South Korean government. Conduct of said works was also related to an establishment of economic policies of USAMGIK but it was mainly to help the South Korean government establish its own economic policies after USAMGIK hand over the power.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김국태, "해방3년과 미국" 돌베개 1984

      2 송병권, "해방 직후 한일 석탄무역의 구조와 성격" 고려사학회 (17) : 105-141, 2004

      3 "서울신문"

      4 김점숙, "미군정의 식량정책과 소비실태" (61) : 2000

      5 최영묵, "미군정의 식량생산과 수급정책" 22 : 1996

      6 이혜숙, "미군정기 지배구조와 한국사회" 선인 2008

      7 李大根, "解放後1950年代의 經濟" 삼성경제연구소 2002

      8 許殷, "美軍政의 食糧增産政策과 農村統制-비료 수급 문제를 중심으로" 2 : 1997

      9 金雲泰, "美軍政의 韓國統治" 博英社 1992

      10 鄭英一, "美軍政의 農業政策 in 美軍政時代의 經濟政策" 한국정신문화연구원 1992

      1 김국태, "해방3년과 미국" 돌베개 1984

      2 송병권, "해방 직후 한일 석탄무역의 구조와 성격" 고려사학회 (17) : 105-141, 2004

      3 "서울신문"

      4 김점숙, "미군정의 식량정책과 소비실태" (61) : 2000

      5 최영묵, "미군정의 식량생산과 수급정책" 22 : 1996

      6 이혜숙, "미군정기 지배구조와 한국사회" 선인 2008

      7 李大根, "解放後1950年代의 經濟" 삼성경제연구소 2002

      8 許殷, "美軍政의 食糧增産政策과 農村統制-비료 수급 문제를 중심으로" 2 : 1997

      9 金雲泰, "美軍政의 韓國統治" 博英社 1992

      10 鄭英一, "美軍政의 農業政策 in 美軍政時代의 經濟政策" 한국정신문화연구원 1992

      11 崔洸, "美軍政의 財政政策 in 美軍政時代의 經濟政策" 한국정신문화연구원 1992

      12 李鍾勳,美軍政의 工業政策, "美軍政時代의 經濟政策" 한국정신문화연구원 1992

      13 鄭眞阿, "第1共和國初期(1948∼1950)의 經濟政策硏究" (106) : 1999

      14 "東亞日報"

      15 "朝鮮經濟年鑑"

      16 "朝鮮經濟年報"

      17 "朝鮮日報"

      18 "平和日報"

      19 "官報" 원주문화사 1991

      20 "南朝鮮過渡立法議院速記錄"

      21 "制憲國會速記錄"

      22 "RG 59, Records of the Pauley Reparations Missions"

      23 Operations Branch, "RG 407, Administration Services Division, Operations Branch, Foreign Occupied Area Report" Administration Services Division 1945-1954,

      24 Historical Section, "Historical Section, Records Regarding the Okinawa Campaign"

      25 許洙, "1945∼46년 美軍政의 生必品統制政策" (34) : 1995

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.66 0.66 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.62 1.675 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼