RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 수용자의 소득과 미디어 지출 추세에 관한 실증적 분석(1966-1997)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76339697

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this article is to examine how Korean consumers have paid media expenditure and to test empirically whether consumer income explains media expenditure through Relative Constancy Hypothesis.
    As a research method, we used Dupagne(1996)’ s Model which log of media expenditure is regressed on log of disposal income. The log-log functional fore is superior to the linear functional form to alleviate problems of heteroskedasticity and to calculate estimates of income elasticities. In addition, we tried to avoid spurious regression by first differencing each variable and reconstructed relative constancy testing model. We analyzed the data collected from 1966 until 1997. Disposable income as explanatory variable was taken from Nation Account(Bank of Berea). We used Kwon(1998.10)’ s media expenditure data as dependent variable.
    Followings are the results of analysis. First, relative constancy hypotheses about broadcasting, software, print media and film were rejected. Second, hardware and electronic media(broadcasting, software and hardware) expenditure was not to be explained by income. In other words, expenditure on hard ware and electronic media can not be explained by relative constancy hypothesis. Third, for gross media expenditure, relative constancy hypothesis was rejected in log transformed model and not rejected in first-differenced model. The share of hardware expenditure in gross media expenditure could not be estimated by only income and it took average 52.4% for 32 years, so we can say that gross media expenditure can not be explained by income.
    According to existing studies, relative constancy hypothesis was supported until 1970s, but it didn’t work since 1980s. For Korea, relative constancy was not supported even by data of 1970s. While gross media expenditure change except hardware can be explained by income, it was not increased at a same rate with income. After 1980, hardware expenditure was increased and at the same time, newspaper, broadcasting and software expenditure was increased, so relative constancy hypothesis could not work. So, when new mass media is to be introduced, its diffusion may not constrained by the income in Korea.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this article is to examine how Korean consumers have paid media expenditure and to test empirically whether consumer income explains media expenditure through Relative Constancy Hypothesis. As a research method, we used Dupagne(1996)...

    The purpose of this article is to examine how Korean consumers have paid media expenditure and to test empirically whether consumer income explains media expenditure through Relative Constancy Hypothesis.
    As a research method, we used Dupagne(1996)’ s Model which log of media expenditure is regressed on log of disposal income. The log-log functional fore is superior to the linear functional form to alleviate problems of heteroskedasticity and to calculate estimates of income elasticities. In addition, we tried to avoid spurious regression by first differencing each variable and reconstructed relative constancy testing model. We analyzed the data collected from 1966 until 1997. Disposable income as explanatory variable was taken from Nation Account(Bank of Berea). We used Kwon(1998.10)’ s media expenditure data as dependent variable.
    Followings are the results of analysis. First, relative constancy hypotheses about broadcasting, software, print media and film were rejected. Second, hardware and electronic media(broadcasting, software and hardware) expenditure was not to be explained by income. In other words, expenditure on hard ware and electronic media can not be explained by relative constancy hypothesis. Third, for gross media expenditure, relative constancy hypothesis was rejected in log transformed model and not rejected in first-differenced model. The share of hardware expenditure in gross media expenditure could not be estimated by only income and it took average 52.4% for 32 years, so we can say that gross media expenditure can not be explained by income.
    According to existing studies, relative constancy hypothesis was supported until 1970s, but it didn’t work since 1980s. For Korea, relative constancy was not supported even by data of 1970s. While gross media expenditure change except hardware can be explained by income, it was not increased at a same rate with income. After 1980, hardware expenditure was increased and at the same time, newspaper, broadcasting and software expenditure was increased, so relative constancy hypothesis could not work. So, when new mass media is to be introduced, its diffusion may not constrained by the income in Korea.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 연구방법
    • 3. 분석결과 및 논의
    • 참고 문헌
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 연구방법
    • 3. 분석결과 및 논의
    • 참고 문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼