About 65 years has passed since Korea and China were divided in 1948 and 1949 respectively. After the division, nations remain apart on the ideological stances as South Korea and Taiwan chose capitalism, while North Korean and China chose communizatio...
About 65 years has passed since Korea and China were divided in 1948 and 1949 respectively. After the division, nations remain apart on the ideological stances as South Korea and Taiwan chose capitalism, while North Korean and China chose communization. However, in current stand point, there is a clear difference in the mutual relationships between Cross-straits and South-North Korea and political/economical configurations. Unlike the South and North relationships, Cross-strait relationship has made substantial achievement, yet the relationship between South and North Korea is in continued cooling-off period after the sinking of Cheon-An in 2010 and political measure of 5.24 after shelling of Yeonpyeong Island. Therefore, this report researched the implication to unification of Korean Peninsula through analyzing distinct characteristics on how Cross-strait nations gave efforts to close a gap between their standpoints and political differences. For the implications in policy, it was justified that equivalent negotiation conditions are necessary, Korean residents in overseas have to be utilized for vitalization of exchanges, national sense of unity should be established, and separation policy in politico-economics overly emphasizing unified theory in functionalism without any political exchanges has to be conquered in order for the unification.