RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      포스트헤게모니 시대의 문화정치: 쾌락, 권력관계 그리고 대중문화 = Cultural Politics in the Age of Post-Hegemony: Pleasure, Power and Popular Culture

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104196113

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this article, I attempt to theorize the role of pleasure in popular culture. To do so, I first offer some of the pitfalls in Gramscian and Althusserian pleasures in ideology as arguments which suggest that the dominant ideology is adequate for making sense of the world, and therefore of our subjectivities. It is the pleasure of familiarity that confirms and validates dominant practice and produces the willing consent of the subject to the system of domination. However, a Foucaudian approach has revealed many problems with this ideological notion of pleasure. The most obvious is that it disempowers people. The theory of ideology assumes that the more enthusiastically people embrace the subjectivities constructed for them by the dominant ideology, the greater their pleasure is. Although there may be a pleasure in conforming to ideology, I suggest that it cannot explain popular resistances as in the case of some of the audience who have refused to align themselves with dominant meanings after watching, for example, Yu-na Kim's performance at the Olympics. To theorize pleasure properly I, then, propose to focus on popular pleasures as opposed to hegemonic ones, which are socially located and are found either in evasion or in resistance, but cannot exist outside the forces of power and social discipline. The pleasures of popular culture, then, are the pleasures in the production of knowledge and ones that involve opposing lines of forces.
      번역하기

      In this article, I attempt to theorize the role of pleasure in popular culture. To do so, I first offer some of the pitfalls in Gramscian and Althusserian pleasures in ideology as arguments which suggest that the dominant ideology is adequate for maki...

      In this article, I attempt to theorize the role of pleasure in popular culture. To do so, I first offer some of the pitfalls in Gramscian and Althusserian pleasures in ideology as arguments which suggest that the dominant ideology is adequate for making sense of the world, and therefore of our subjectivities. It is the pleasure of familiarity that confirms and validates dominant practice and produces the willing consent of the subject to the system of domination. However, a Foucaudian approach has revealed many problems with this ideological notion of pleasure. The most obvious is that it disempowers people. The theory of ideology assumes that the more enthusiastically people embrace the subjectivities constructed for them by the dominant ideology, the greater their pleasure is. Although there may be a pleasure in conforming to ideology, I suggest that it cannot explain popular resistances as in the case of some of the audience who have refused to align themselves with dominant meanings after watching, for example, Yu-na Kim's performance at the Olympics. To theorize pleasure properly I, then, propose to focus on popular pleasures as opposed to hegemonic ones, which are socially located and are found either in evasion or in resistance, but cannot exist outside the forces of power and social discipline. The pleasures of popular culture, then, are the pleasures in the production of knowledge and ones that involve opposing lines of forces.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Foucault, Michel, "The Subject and Power. in: Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics" Harvester P 1982

      2 Hall, Stuart, "The Rediscovery of ‘Ideology’: Return of the Repressed in Media Studies. in: Culture, Society, and the Media" Methuen 56-90, 1982

      3 Hall, Stuart, "The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees. in: Marx: A Hundred Years On" Lawrence & Wishart 57-85, 1983

      4 de Certeau, Michel, "The Practice of Everyday Life" U of California P 1984

      5 Barthes, Roland, "The Pleasure of the Text" Hill and Wang 1975

      6 Foucault, Michel, "The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction" Vintage Books 1980

      7 Barthes, Roland, "The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies" Hill and Wang 1979

      8 Fiske, John, "Television Culture" Methuen 1987

      9 MacCabe, Colin, "Realism and Cinema: Notes on Brechtian Thesis.” in: Popular Television and Film" BFI 1981

      10 Bakhtin, Mikhail, "Rablais and His World" MIT P 1968

      1 Foucault, Michel, "The Subject and Power. in: Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics" Harvester P 1982

      2 Hall, Stuart, "The Rediscovery of ‘Ideology’: Return of the Repressed in Media Studies. in: Culture, Society, and the Media" Methuen 56-90, 1982

      3 Hall, Stuart, "The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees. in: Marx: A Hundred Years On" Lawrence & Wishart 57-85, 1983

      4 de Certeau, Michel, "The Practice of Everyday Life" U of California P 1984

      5 Barthes, Roland, "The Pleasure of the Text" Hill and Wang 1975

      6 Foucault, Michel, "The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction" Vintage Books 1980

      7 Barthes, Roland, "The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies" Hill and Wang 1979

      8 Fiske, John, "Television Culture" Methuen 1987

      9 MacCabe, Colin, "Realism and Cinema: Notes on Brechtian Thesis.” in: Popular Television and Film" BFI 1981

      10 Bakhtin, Mikhail, "Rablais and His World" MIT P 1968

      11 Foucault, Michel, "Power/Knowledge" Pantheon 1972

      12 Fiske, John, "Power Plays Power Works" Verso 1993

      13 Chang, Chin-Hwa Flora, "Post-Marxism or Beyon: Hall and Foucault" 10 (10): 1986

      14 Hall, Stuart, "Notes on Deconstructing ‘the Popular.’. in: People’s History and Socialist Theory" Routledge and kegan Paul 227-240, 1981

      15 Barthes, Roland, "Mythologies" Paladin 1973

      16 Laclau, Ernesto, "Hegemony & Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics" Verso 1985

      17 Hall, Stuart, "Encoding/Decoding. in: Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79" Hutchinson 128-138, 1980

      18 Bourdieu, Pierre, "Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste" Harvard UP 1984

      19 Foucault, Michel, "Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison" Vintage Books 1979

      20 Hall, Stuart, "Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms" Media, Culture & Society 2 57-72, 1980

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-08-06 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Association Of Literature And Film -> The Korean Association Of Literature and Film KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.17 0.17 0.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.26 0.491 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼