RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      A Failed Romance: Literary-to-Cinematographic Adaptation of Gunga Din

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104196119

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      While the film theories enrich the scope and depth of film analysis and interpretation, the theories borrowed from disciplines exterior to the cinema have also tended to slight the fact that filmmaking process inevitably involves materially and discursively diverse mediums—story, script and screen. Or if acknowledged, the details of the material distinctions have been given short shrift. While capable of offering an insightful explanatory grip on a film’s underlying structures, implications and values, these extraneous theories often ignore this inter-medial transformation which filmmaking goes through.
      Gunga Din instantiates the ways in which an imperialist master narrative propagates as the medium of representation changes. By examining the methods of operating at the shooting and observing imperialist discourse prevalent in the film industry, we can posit two, if related, possibilities: first, Stevens’ decision to have an “on location” film, where the visual overrides the textual and enlivens the historical-mythical memories long inscribed in the landscape text; second, genre conflict, where romance becomes unviable to grow on the larger genre template of masculine adventure. The top-down theories, though powerful and efficient in interpretation, may pre-empt what might otherwise become crucial to the understanding of a filmmaking. The transaction of ideology can be grasped not only through the analysis of film narratives, but also through the feasibility of inter-medial transformations. Gunga Din is construed interactively and inter- medially among genres and media, and the analysis of its filmmaking gives us some empirical purchase on just how imperialist discourse materializes in the making.
      번역하기

      While the film theories enrich the scope and depth of film analysis and interpretation, the theories borrowed from disciplines exterior to the cinema have also tended to slight the fact that filmmaking process inevitably involves materially and discur...

      While the film theories enrich the scope and depth of film analysis and interpretation, the theories borrowed from disciplines exterior to the cinema have also tended to slight the fact that filmmaking process inevitably involves materially and discursively diverse mediums—story, script and screen. Or if acknowledged, the details of the material distinctions have been given short shrift. While capable of offering an insightful explanatory grip on a film’s underlying structures, implications and values, these extraneous theories often ignore this inter-medial transformation which filmmaking goes through.
      Gunga Din instantiates the ways in which an imperialist master narrative propagates as the medium of representation changes. By examining the methods of operating at the shooting and observing imperialist discourse prevalent in the film industry, we can posit two, if related, possibilities: first, Stevens’ decision to have an “on location” film, where the visual overrides the textual and enlivens the historical-mythical memories long inscribed in the landscape text; second, genre conflict, where romance becomes unviable to grow on the larger genre template of masculine adventure. The top-down theories, though powerful and efficient in interpretation, may pre-empt what might otherwise become crucial to the understanding of a filmmaking. The transaction of ideology can be grasped not only through the analysis of film narratives, but also through the feasibility of inter-medial transformations. Gunga Din is construed interactively and inter- medially among genres and media, and the analysis of its filmmaking gives us some empirical purchase on just how imperialist discourse materializes in the making.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Richards, Jeffrey, "Visions of Yesterday" Routledge and Kegan Paul 1973

      2 Hecht, Ben, "The Front Page" Covici-Friege 1928

      3 Chatman, Seymour, "Story and Discourse" Cornell UP 1980

      4 Singh, Shailendra, "Novels on the Indian Mutiny" Arnold-Heinemann 1980

      5 Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith, "Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics" Routledge 1983

      6 Rochelle, Reed, "George Stevens" Dialogue on Film 4.8 1-13, 1975

      7 Metz, Christian, "Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema" Oxford UP 1974

      8 Behlmer, Rudy, "America’s Favorite Movies" Frederick Ungar 1982

      1 Richards, Jeffrey, "Visions of Yesterday" Routledge and Kegan Paul 1973

      2 Hecht, Ben, "The Front Page" Covici-Friege 1928

      3 Chatman, Seymour, "Story and Discourse" Cornell UP 1980

      4 Singh, Shailendra, "Novels on the Indian Mutiny" Arnold-Heinemann 1980

      5 Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith, "Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics" Routledge 1983

      6 Rochelle, Reed, "George Stevens" Dialogue on Film 4.8 1-13, 1975

      7 Metz, Christian, "Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema" Oxford UP 1974

      8 Behlmer, Rudy, "America’s Favorite Movies" Frederick Ungar 1982

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-08-06 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Association Of Literature And Film -> The Korean Association Of Literature and Film KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.17 0.17 0.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.26 0.491 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼