RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      16세기 양반사회의 “膳物經濟” = Gift Economy in Yangban's Society in 16C

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76535940

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Relating to this academic conference, author tried to revealthe corruption situations in Chosun dynasty through Yangban(Aristocratic Class in Chosun Dynasty) official's way operating economy. From current view, there are many illegal, unreasonable aspects in Yangban officials' economic lives in 16C. Request for a official position through presenting gifts were common in their lives at that time. And taking advantage of their own position as governmental official, they cultivated some garrison farmor participated in the process of paying tribute to king(it was called as Bangnap in Korean). Although the latter has strong negative image, gift economy is understood as economy-operating way of premodern society.
      Characteristics of economic system in premodern society lie in unstable and unclear ones. Modern national economy, finance has been developed toward clear distinction of public and private affairs, and in collection taxes, the only public collect secures legitimacy. Private collection or private spending taxes is the problem directly linking to bribe or embezzlement. National economy of premodern society, however is characterized that the distinction between public and private affairs is vague. Therefore, we are hard to absolutely think all considered not being public as corruptions.
      So, we need to examine the operation process of financial source from local finance operating system in Chosun society. Chosun, of course, as rare case, had suggested the ideas to clarify the distinction of public and private affairs from its establishment. The nation founders terminated the hereditary estate law andeliminated the grant of individual's privilege receiving tax from cultivating farmers. They had ideological frame which nation collects all financial resources and appropriately distribute them to people, and we can find the course realizing the goal. But, the idea eventually failed to make format with its original meaning.The gift economy examined until now is commonly considered as private section. But it is the sign that public affairs and private ones were not divided in Chosun's national finance. Unique operation principle of gift economy needs to be understood in Chosun times. At that time, local finance was mainly based on non-regular finance section, and gift is directly related to this problem.
      It can be said that Yangban(aristocratic) officials' behaviors presenting and receiving gifts in 16C was very universal economic system. The gift type by medium of official position has characteristics that local official unilaterally presents to Yangban officials and draws necessary financial resource out of the local office he governs. As nation takes some parts in gift presentation, gift can be said to be a part of national redistribution system. These Yangban(aristocratic) officials used gifts in exclusively enjoying them with their governmental authorities and in solidifying their unity. However, these behaviors of gift presentation eventually run out their lives along with the loss of an individual's influence. But the gift type presenting among relatives or friends still remain with us,
      Then how this gift-presenting behavior was appeared in the latter term of Chosun dynasty? Author is continually interested in that part, but have not found any related data. Author think it is dangerous to hastily conclude some periodic changes through only a few cases. But I hope the appearance of important data equalable to 'Mookjae's Diary or 'Miam's Diary' in 16C.
      번역하기

      Relating to this academic conference, author tried to revealthe corruption situations in Chosun dynasty through Yangban(Aristocratic Class in Chosun Dynasty) official's way operating economy. From current view, there are many illegal, unreasonable asp...

      Relating to this academic conference, author tried to revealthe corruption situations in Chosun dynasty through Yangban(Aristocratic Class in Chosun Dynasty) official's way operating economy. From current view, there are many illegal, unreasonable aspects in Yangban officials' economic lives in 16C. Request for a official position through presenting gifts were common in their lives at that time. And taking advantage of their own position as governmental official, they cultivated some garrison farmor participated in the process of paying tribute to king(it was called as Bangnap in Korean). Although the latter has strong negative image, gift economy is understood as economy-operating way of premodern society.
      Characteristics of economic system in premodern society lie in unstable and unclear ones. Modern national economy, finance has been developed toward clear distinction of public and private affairs, and in collection taxes, the only public collect secures legitimacy. Private collection or private spending taxes is the problem directly linking to bribe or embezzlement. National economy of premodern society, however is characterized that the distinction between public and private affairs is vague. Therefore, we are hard to absolutely think all considered not being public as corruptions.
      So, we need to examine the operation process of financial source from local finance operating system in Chosun society. Chosun, of course, as rare case, had suggested the ideas to clarify the distinction of public and private affairs from its establishment. The nation founders terminated the hereditary estate law andeliminated the grant of individual's privilege receiving tax from cultivating farmers. They had ideological frame which nation collects all financial resources and appropriately distribute them to people, and we can find the course realizing the goal. But, the idea eventually failed to make format with its original meaning.The gift economy examined until now is commonly considered as private section. But it is the sign that public affairs and private ones were not divided in Chosun's national finance. Unique operation principle of gift economy needs to be understood in Chosun times. At that time, local finance was mainly based on non-regular finance section, and gift is directly related to this problem.
      It can be said that Yangban(aristocratic) officials' behaviors presenting and receiving gifts in 16C was very universal economic system. The gift type by medium of official position has characteristics that local official unilaterally presents to Yangban officials and draws necessary financial resource out of the local office he governs. As nation takes some parts in gift presentation, gift can be said to be a part of national redistribution system. These Yangban(aristocratic) officials used gifts in exclusively enjoying them with their governmental authorities and in solidifying their unity. However, these behaviors of gift presentation eventually run out their lives along with the loss of an individual's influence. But the gift type presenting among relatives or friends still remain with us,
      Then how this gift-presenting behavior was appeared in the latter term of Chosun dynasty? Author is continually interested in that part, but have not found any related data. Author think it is dangerous to hastily conclude some periodic changes through only a few cases. But I hope the appearance of important data equalable to 'Mookjae's Diary or 'Miam's Diary' in 16C.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 자료와 가계
      • Ⅲ. 선물의 분류방식과 종류
      • Ⅳ. 선물의 실태와 규모
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말에 대신하여?선물의 사회경제적 성격
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 자료와 가계
      • Ⅲ. 선물의 분류방식과 종류
      • Ⅳ. 선물의 실태와 규모
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말에 대신하여?선물의 사회경제적 성격
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (재인증)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.15 1.15 1.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.21 1.16 2.615 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼