RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    재산과세 잠재세원탐색에 관한 연구 = Articles of General Interest : A Study on Broadening of Property Tax Base

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19686111

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is conceptualizing the value of property and investgating whether the current property tax base needs to broaden in order to equalize tax burden among the tax bases. Not like Japan and the United States, the property tax base in Korea excludes most of machines and equippments in spite of their property value. It leads unfair tax burden among tax payers. Everything that has the property value should be taxed, but we propose income product machines and equippments as new property tax bases at the initial stage. Because machines and equippments are the second largest(18.0%) entity among the wealth of nation followed by the buildings(33.2%). In addition, those income product machines and equippments are the main tax bases of personal property in Japan and the United States. In order to include machines and equippments as tax bases, we propose the contigency plan for filing them. Broadening the tax base not only generates the tax revenues but also increases the compliance costs. Thus, locating the tax base prior to levy the property tax is the most important tax administration. Finding out the tax base of cooperations may not be difficult since they have to submit their annual financial report to the IRA, however, those of individuals and partners do not so it may be difficult. Also, taxing the income product machine and equippments may discourage the machine intensive industry. It should count on these types of problems in advance.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is conceptualizing the value of property and investgating whether the current property tax base needs to broaden in order to equalize tax burden among the tax bases. Not like Japan and the United States, the property tax base...

    The purpose of this study is conceptualizing the value of property and investgating whether the current property tax base needs to broaden in order to equalize tax burden among the tax bases. Not like Japan and the United States, the property tax base in Korea excludes most of machines and equippments in spite of their property value. It leads unfair tax burden among tax payers. Everything that has the property value should be taxed, but we propose income product machines and equippments as new property tax bases at the initial stage. Because machines and equippments are the second largest(18.0%) entity among the wealth of nation followed by the buildings(33.2%). In addition, those income product machines and equippments are the main tax bases of personal property in Japan and the United States. In order to include machines and equippments as tax bases, we propose the contigency plan for filing them. Broadening the tax base not only generates the tax revenues but also increases the compliance costs. Thus, locating the tax base prior to levy the property tax is the most important tax administration. Finding out the tax base of cooperations may not be difficult since they have to submit their annual financial report to the IRA, however, those of individuals and partners do not so it may be difficult. Also, taxing the income product machine and equippments may discourage the machine intensive industry. It should count on these types of problems in advance.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.69 1.69 1.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.83 1.8 1.759 0.69
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼