RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    읽기와 쓰기의 통합적 교수 학습 방안 탐색 = Exploring the Instruction Methods for Integrating Reading and Writing

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102063240

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The aim of this study was to explore the reading and writing integration models for secondary students and to suggest specific instruction methods by the model. The integration model was determined by goal and direction of reading and writing integration. Reading and writing are closely related, mutually reinforce each other. But when one skill was determined as priority domain, the other skill was determined as complement domain. The reading and writing instruction was classified according to the integration models. Integration models are below. (1) reading to write model: this model explain the reading is helpful for enhancing wiring achievement. In the model, student can generate fluency the content using reading source texts and revise through critical reading. (2)writing to read model: this model explain that writing is very useful tool for improving reading. In the model, student can read exactly and deeply using summary and analytic essay writing. (3) reading and writing model: this model explain that when student learn specific topic or meaning, genre or text type, reading and writing were cooperative integrated.
    번역하기

    The aim of this study was to explore the reading and writing integration models for secondary students and to suggest specific instruction methods by the model. The integration model was determined by goal and direction of reading and writing integrat...

    The aim of this study was to explore the reading and writing integration models for secondary students and to suggest specific instruction methods by the model. The integration model was determined by goal and direction of reading and writing integration. Reading and writing are closely related, mutually reinforce each other. But when one skill was determined as priority domain, the other skill was determined as complement domain. The reading and writing instruction was classified according to the integration models. Integration models are below. (1) reading to write model: this model explain the reading is helpful for enhancing wiring achievement. In the model, student can generate fluency the content using reading source texts and revise through critical reading. (2)writing to read model: this model explain that writing is very useful tool for improving reading. In the model, student can read exactly and deeply using summary and analytic essay writing. (3) reading and writing model: this model explain that when student learn specific topic or meaning, genre or text type, reading and writing were cooperative integrated.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Van Dijk, T. A., "텍스트학" 아르케 1995

    2 이재승, "읽기와 쓰기 통합 지도의 방법과 유의점" 한국독서학회 (11) : 275-300, 2004

    3 김정자, "읽기와 쓰기 통합 지도를 위한 국어과 교육과정과 교과서" 한국작문학회 (6) : 251-280, 2008

    4 김혜정, "읽기 쓰기 통합 활동에서 의미 구성의 내용과 이행 과정 연구" 한국독서학회 (11) : 141-180, 2004

    5 박영민, "쓰기 지도 및 쓰기 평가의 방법" 시그마프레스 2012

    6 Irwin, J. W., "독서지도론" 박이정 2003

    7 김봉순, "독서와 작문 통합 지도의 전망 : 비문학 담화를 중심으로" 한국독서학회 (11) : 83-112, 2004

    8 김명순, "독서 작문 통합 지도의 전제와 기본 방향" 한국독서학회 (11) : 61-82, 2004

    9 Graham, S., "Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading" A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act. Report 2010

    10 Kintsch, W., "Toward a model of text comprehension and production" 85 : 363-394, 1978

    1 Van Dijk, T. A., "텍스트학" 아르케 1995

    2 이재승, "읽기와 쓰기 통합 지도의 방법과 유의점" 한국독서학회 (11) : 275-300, 2004

    3 김정자, "읽기와 쓰기 통합 지도를 위한 국어과 교육과정과 교과서" 한국작문학회 (6) : 251-280, 2008

    4 김혜정, "읽기 쓰기 통합 활동에서 의미 구성의 내용과 이행 과정 연구" 한국독서학회 (11) : 141-180, 2004

    5 박영민, "쓰기 지도 및 쓰기 평가의 방법" 시그마프레스 2012

    6 Irwin, J. W., "독서지도론" 박이정 2003

    7 김봉순, "독서와 작문 통합 지도의 전망 : 비문학 담화를 중심으로" 한국독서학회 (11) : 83-112, 2004

    8 김명순, "독서 작문 통합 지도의 전제와 기본 방향" 한국독서학회 (11) : 61-82, 2004

    9 Graham, S., "Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading" A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act. Report 2010

    10 Kintsch, W., "Toward a model of text comprehension and production" 85 : 363-394, 1978

    11 Kintsch, W., "Toward a model of text comprehension and production" 85 : 363-394, 1978

    12 Kellogg, R. T., "The psychology of writing" Oxford University Press 1994

    13 Scardamalia, M., "The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children's composing, In The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives" John Wiley & Sons 67-95, 1983

    14 Grabe, W., "Teaching and researching reading" Longman 2002

    15 Enright, M.K., "TOEFL 2000 Reading Framework: A Working Paper" Educational Testing Service 2000

    16 Abbott, R., "Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers" 85 : 478-508, 1993

    17 Tierney, R.J., "Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes, In Handbook of reading research" Longman 246-280, 1996

    18 Biancarosa, G., "Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy—A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York" Alliance for Excellent Education Carr 2002

    19 Fitzgerald, J., "Reading and writing relations and their development" 35 : 39-51, 2000

    20 최숙기, "Rasch 모형을 활용한 요약문 평가 준거 개발 및 타당도 분석 -고등학생 설명문 텍스트 요약하기를 중심으로-" 한국독서학회 (25) : 415-451, 2011

    21 Holmqvist, K., "Perceiving and producing the frog story, In Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman" Kluwer 293-306, 2004

    22 Brown, A., "Macrorules for summarizing text: The development of expertise" 22 : 1-14, 1983

    23 Swanson, H.L., "Individual differences in children's working memory and writing skill" 63 : 358-385, 1996

    24 Flower, L., "Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision" 37 (37): 16-55, 1986

    25 Kintsch, W., "Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition" Cambridge University Press 1998

    26 Wengelin, A., "Combined eye-tracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production" 41 (41): 337-351, 2009

    27 Hayes, J. R., "A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing, In The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1-27, 1996

    28 Graham, S., "A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students" 99 (99): 445-476, 2007

    29 주민재, "7차 중학교 국어과 교육과정을 기반으로 한 읽기⋅쓰기 통합 지도 수업 모형 연구 - 8학년 자서전 읽기와 쓰기를 중심으로-" 교육문제연구소 45 : 89-115, 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.99 0.99 1.11
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.18 1.18 1.509 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼