RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    존 로크의 경험론에 있어서 오성의 능력과 교육 = A Capacity of the Understanding and Education in John Locke`s Empiricism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75396674

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The principal aim of this paper is to discuss a capacity of the understanding and education which is relevant to the cultivation of the intellect in John Locke`s empiricism. To sum up: In this paper, first of all, John Locke`s educational thinking has an implication for Korean education even today. He emphasizes the importance of observing children, and of planning their education in the light of the observation, for he realized the starting-point of education is the child and his needs, Secondly, the influence of Locke in his empiricism and realist (gentleman) education was widespread and profound. In philosophy, according to Codarsco, his empiricism influenced Berkeley, Hume, and Kant; in education, his views Rousseau, Basedow, Pestalozzi, and Herbart.. If Locke`s great importance lies in his investigation of the problem of epistemology, his importance in the history of education lies in his analysis of human nature as it is before experience and without innate ideas. Thirdly, no thinker can be properly understand apart from the historical context in which he belongs; for Locke both reflects the mind of his age and also contributes to the renewal and redirection of that mind: in his Essay Concerning Human Understanding, the great revolution towards empiricism begins, and in his Some Thoughts Concerning Education and Of the Conduct of the Understanding, his theories of gentleman education and disciplinarian education can be accomplished.
    번역하기

    The principal aim of this paper is to discuss a capacity of the understanding and education which is relevant to the cultivation of the intellect in John Locke`s empiricism. To sum up: In this paper, first of all, John Locke`s educational thinking ha...

    The principal aim of this paper is to discuss a capacity of the understanding and education which is relevant to the cultivation of the intellect in John Locke`s empiricism. To sum up: In this paper, first of all, John Locke`s educational thinking has an implication for Korean education even today. He emphasizes the importance of observing children, and of planning their education in the light of the observation, for he realized the starting-point of education is the child and his needs, Secondly, the influence of Locke in his empiricism and realist (gentleman) education was widespread and profound. In philosophy, according to Codarsco, his empiricism influenced Berkeley, Hume, and Kant; in education, his views Rousseau, Basedow, Pestalozzi, and Herbart.. If Locke`s great importance lies in his investigation of the problem of epistemology, his importance in the history of education lies in his analysis of human nature as it is before experience and without innate ideas. Thirdly, no thinker can be properly understand apart from the historical context in which he belongs; for Locke both reflects the mind of his age and also contributes to the renewal and redirection of that mind: in his Essay Concerning Human Understanding, the great revolution towards empiricism begins, and in his Some Thoughts Concerning Education and Of the Conduct of the Understanding, his theories of gentleman education and disciplinarian education can be accomplished.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.61 0.998 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼