RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCOPUS KCI등재

      간접문맥조영상 담 , 췌 병변의 간외 문맥침윤 양성 - 수술소견과의 비교 = Indirect Portographic Patterns of Extrahepatic Portal Vein Invasion in Pancreaticobiliary Lesions ; Correlation with Surgical Findings간접문맥조영상 담 , 췌 병변의 간외 문맥침윤 양성 - 수술소견과의 비교

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3380979

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to obtain the findings about resectability and curative surgery including portal vein resection in extrahepatic portal vein invasion of invasive pancreaticobiliary lesions. Methods: We analyzed the portographic findings of 64 patients with invasive pancreaticobiliary lesions. All cases underwent indirect portography for evaluation of portal vein invasion and were surgically confirmed(curative resection;40, palliative surgery;24). Pathology of materials were pancreatic neoplasm(n=27, including eleven benign or borderline malignancies), ampulla of Vater cancer(n=15), gallbladder cancer(n=10), bile duct cancer(n 10), duodenal adenocarcinoma(n=l), and leiomyosarcoma(n=l). We classified indirect portographic findings as following 6 types, I: normal, II: simple shift, I1I: unilateral narrowing, IV: bilateral narrowing, V: bilateral narrowing with collateral vein, VI: intraluminal filling defect, and compared pathology, presence of portal vein invasion and possibility of portal vein resection on surgical findings. Results: Portographic type was I;18, II;19, III;11, IV;13, V;2, Vl;1. Benign 1esions were confined to I and II, but malignant lesions were distributed from I to VI. We couldnt find portal vein invasion in all I and II, but could find portal vein invasion in all cases of IV, V, VI, and 55%(6/11) in III. Among 22 cases of portal vein invasion, curative resection including portal resection was possible in 4 cases of type III, 1 case of type IV, 1 case of type VI(6/22;27%). Conclusions: Portal vein invasion can be excluded in type I and II, should be considered in type IV, V, and VI, but in cases of type III, we must consider the site, extension of pathology visible in other images. However, portal vein invasion was not always absolute contraindication of curative resection including portal resection. (Korean 3 Gastroenterol 1995;27:711-718)
      번역하기

      Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to obtain the findings about resectability and curative surgery including portal vein resection in extrahepatic portal vein invasion of invasive pancreaticobiliary lesions. Methods: We analyzed the portograph...

      Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to obtain the findings about resectability and curative surgery including portal vein resection in extrahepatic portal vein invasion of invasive pancreaticobiliary lesions. Methods: We analyzed the portographic findings of 64 patients with invasive pancreaticobiliary lesions. All cases underwent indirect portography for evaluation of portal vein invasion and were surgically confirmed(curative resection;40, palliative surgery;24). Pathology of materials were pancreatic neoplasm(n=27, including eleven benign or borderline malignancies), ampulla of Vater cancer(n=15), gallbladder cancer(n=10), bile duct cancer(n 10), duodenal adenocarcinoma(n=l), and leiomyosarcoma(n=l). We classified indirect portographic findings as following 6 types, I: normal, II: simple shift, I1I: unilateral narrowing, IV: bilateral narrowing, V: bilateral narrowing with collateral vein, VI: intraluminal filling defect, and compared pathology, presence of portal vein invasion and possibility of portal vein resection on surgical findings. Results: Portographic type was I;18, II;19, III;11, IV;13, V;2, Vl;1. Benign 1esions were confined to I and II, but malignant lesions were distributed from I to VI. We couldnt find portal vein invasion in all I and II, but could find portal vein invasion in all cases of IV, V, VI, and 55%(6/11) in III. Among 22 cases of portal vein invasion, curative resection including portal resection was possible in 4 cases of type III, 1 case of type IV, 1 case of type VI(6/22;27%). Conclusions: Portal vein invasion can be excluded in type I and II, should be considered in type IV, V, and VI, but in cases of type III, we must consider the site, extension of pathology visible in other images. However, portal vein invasion was not always absolute contraindication of curative resection including portal resection. (Korean 3 Gastroenterol 1995;27:711-718)

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼