집합건물의 소유 및 관리 효율성을 위한 법적 쟁점 = An Exploration of Legal Issues in Ownership and Management of Multi-unit Buildings for Efficient Management

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

1. CONTENTS
(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The purposes of this research are to examine the ownership and management of multi-unit buildings in the legal context, to address practical issues for effective and efficient management, and to propose corrective legal measures.
(2) RESEARCH METHOD
This study utilized content analysis to meet the research goals. With the literature review on relevant laws, regulations, rules in such advanced economic countries as Japan, USA, and Germany, this qualitetive research analyzed the structural features of legislations on multi-unit buildings, and also it compared the contextual aspects of their ownership and management in order to draw UP proactive approaches to the efficient management.
(3) RESEARCH FINDINGS
The research indicated two legal issues confronting multi-unit buildings ownership and management. In fact, the current laws, “Law on Ownership and Management of Multi-unit Buildings” and “Civil Law,” specify the leasehold right of multi-unit buildings inconsistent with the land use right, so that the flaw limits the property rights of owners. Also, it’s found that the legal requirement for the management of multi-unit buildings is based on the number of units instead of gross Door area. Training programs for on-site housing managers and homeowners’ association that are arbitrary under the current legislation should be mandatory to foster adequate and sufficient management. It’s necessary to enable tenants to participate in management. Besides, management modes in multi-unit buildings will not be selected until half of the entire households move in. To resolve this concern, the law heightens the continuity of management agents (from move-in to occupancy phases).
2. RESULTS
This research implies that the management of multi-unit buildings requires more professionalization to provide the efficiency and effectiveness of the management. The current legislations need to be revised in order to clarify legal requirements of professional management, long range maintenance plans and long term reserve funds.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 선행연구 고찰
• Ⅲ. 집합건물의 구분소유와 관리
• Ⅳ. 집합건물의 소유 및 관리상의 문제점
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 參考文獻

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강혜경, "한국과 미국의 공동주택 관리제도 비교" 한국생활과학회 15 (15): 867-878, 2006

2 김정현, "집합주택(아파트)의 소유, 관리에 관한 고찰" 법원행정처 1 : 1974

3 최종길, "집합주택(아파트)의 구분소유에 관한 비교법적 실체적 연구" 서울대학교 법학연구소 11 (11): 1970

4 이상무, "집합건물의 소방안전관리 개선방안" 대구대학교 행정대학원 2008

5 김일, "집합건물의 구분소유권에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 정경대학원 2004

6 이영희, "집합건물의 구분소유권과 대지권에 관한 연구" 창원대학교 대학원 2004

7 박태신, "집합건물의 관리에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 대학원 2008

8 안갑준, "집합건물 구분소유권의 등기에 관한 연구" 건국대학교 대학원 2005

9 배순석, "주택보전활성화정책연구" 국토개발연구원 1993

10 대법원, "자 2009마1449 결정"

11 대법원, "선고 98다35020 판결"

12 대법원, "선고 98다32540 판결"

13 대법원, "선고 2007다90241 판결"

14 대법원, "선고 2006다56565 판결"

15 대법원, "선고 2003다17774 판결"

16 대법원, "선고 2002다43851 판결"

17 서울고법, "선고 2002누14876 판결"

18 이창석, "부동산관리론" 신광문화사 2010

19 박경량, "독일의 주거소유권법상의 집합건물관리" 한국부동산법학회 4 : 1997

20 "국가법령정보센터"

21 최용환, "구분소유의 기본문제" 법조협회 21 : 1972

22 전병익, "구분소유범의 비교법적 고찰, 조두호교수회갑기념논문집" 부산대학교 법학연구소 1983

23 脇田武光, "都市土地經濟論" 大明堂 2005

24 広田美久, "米国のマンション維持管理制度の特徴と我が国との比較" 2002

25 法務省, "所管法會"

26 法務省, "所管法會"

27 笛木謙, "マンションにおける適切な管理への取組みの現状とその課題" 文化構想学部社会構築論系4年 2010