전통춤 기술(記述)의 논리와 체계적 범주 = The Descriptive Logic and Systemic Categorization of The Korean Traditional Dance

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The discussion revolves around how to eliminate the confusion between the category and the system, which one would encounter in an attempt to elucidate the form of traditional dance and to clearly understand it. The category and system of the form of dance should be primarily set by determining what perspective should be taken in viewing forms: in other words, it should start by determining whether to focus on general ideas of dance based on the scientific analysis, or to focus on uniqueness by accentuating the phenomenon and the perception. Furthermore, it is necessary to establish the concept of form in accordance with the endorsed perspective. For instance, whether form should be viewed in relation with the arrangement of elements or viewed in terms of the delivery of information. The logic to be secured in a different dimension relates to the structure, principles of the form of traditional dance form and its efforts (effort, emotional curve of tension and relaxation) and principles. It is the system and category of traditional dance that could be placed in the right position in this very process. The discussion groups and arranges the above three items in different descriptive logics 1, 2 and 3 and the key direction can be summarized as three ideas. Firstly, the starting point of the discourse around the form of dance lies not in the concept but in the phenomenon of dancing itself, and the subject matter produced by it turns into the center of the discussion. In this vein, by critically embracing the phenomenology of art, it sees the form of traditional dance not as an isolated phenomenon devoid of the life and the history but one that bears history while suggesting the concept of form, contents, and linguistic characteristics and thematic sentiments. Secondly, by understanding the form of traditional dance as the emotional matters organized by successive form principles, the discussion largely categorizes it into the principles of the structure system, principle and the efforts principle. It also clarifies the concepts of cross-stitched seam structure, Maru structure and tying and untying structure, and elucidates the principle of it by examining effort. Thirdly, it is to represent by establishing category and system in a concrete manner by summing up the aforementioned two and it is also linked with the previous discussion that searched for the category and system in the context of linguistics. In the end, describing traditional dance is an interpretation inquiring the meaning and an aesthetic approach to asking for values. However, if the logic underpinning the description fails to have a firm basis, the meaning and value would be rendered meaningless.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최태현, "해금산조연구Ⅱ" 민속원 2008

2 최태현, "해금산조연구" 세광음악출판사 1987

3 김지원, "한국춤의 코드와 해석" 한양대학교출판부 2006

4 임학선, "한국춤 동작의 기본구조와 원리" 국립국악원 273-290, 1998

5 전유오, "한국전통춤의 특질 이해와 움직임의 기록 및 분석방법제안" 2 : 22-41, 2002

6 송성아, "한국전통춤 연구를 위한 언어학적 접근은 어떻게 가능한가" 한국무용기록학회 18 : 41-58, 2010

7 채희완, "한국전통무용의 성격" 151-160, 1986

8 허순선, "한국의 춤사위와 무보틀" 형설출판사 2005

9 김지원, "한국무용기록에 있어서 호흡 표기에 관한 의미론과 전개방향 모색" 한국무용기록학회 18 : 1-21, 2010

10 조동일, "탈춤의 구조와 원리" 기린원 1988

11 채희완, "탈춤" 대원사 1992

12 채희완, "제천의식과 한국 춤의 원류" 2 : 117-151, 2003

13 채희완, "전통춤동작의 동작언어학적 접근" 8 : 135-166, 2009

14 이보형, "전통음악의 리듬 분석 방법론" 77-120, 1997

15 이보형, "전통기보론에서 박의 집합론과 분할론의 합리성과 효용성" 17 : 19-40, 1995

16 이익환, "의미론개론" 한신문화사 2003

17 Aldrich, V. C, "예술철학" 서광사 2004

18 이애주, "승무의 구조와 춤사위연구" 27 : 259-313, 1995

19 Sachs,C, "세계무용사" 풀빛 1983

20 김열규, "맺힘과 풀림으로 이루어지는 우리 춤" 16-29, 1982

21 Stodelle,E, "도리스 험프리의 테크닉과 창의적 가능성" 한미서관 1995

22 이승헌, "단전호흡" 대원사 1992

23 채희완, "가면극의 민중적 미의식 연구를 위한 예비적 고찰" 서울대학교 1977

24 Humphrey,D, "The Art of Making Dances" Princeton Book Company 1959

25 Hofmann,R, "Realms of Meaning" Longman 1995

26 송성아, "Laban의 Effort분석을 통한 처용무의 움직임 연구" 2 : 182-223, 2005