RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      1970년대 유교 전통 인식과 충효 정책 = Loyalty-Filial Piety(chunghyo;忠孝) Policy and Conception on Confucian Tradition in the 1970s

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108137828

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In 1977, when Park Jeong-hee emphasized loyalty-filial piety in the new year inspection tour to Ministry of Education, the principle of loyalty-filial piety spread not only in the educational world but also in society as a whole. Loyalty-filial piety was promoted as our own ideological tradition. However, the study of the history of Korean thought at that time was at a rudimentary level, and the emphasis on loyalty and filial piety was based on the Japanese Empire organized ideology of Korean Confucianism and Hwangdo Confucianism(皇道儒敎). Park Jong-Hong tried to reconstruct the history of Korean thought, but he was still unable to escape the logic of Japanese colonial ideology. Park Jong-hong's argument was generally accepted and became the academic background for emphasizing loyalty and filial piety as a policy revival.
      Loyalty-filial piety was generally recognized as a revival of the Confucian tradition, but as a modernized society, the Confucian tradition alone could not spread socially in Korea. Kim Hyung-hyo reinterpreted loyalty-filial piety as an ideology that emphasizes social authority and hierarchy by grafting it with Western thought. His argument spread to social ethics with the background of the Saemaeum movement(새마음운동) led by Park Geun-hye and the policy support for loyalty-filial piety. This was a political response to the spread of the people's movement in the 1970s, and through this, it was intended to create a vertical ruling order of rank and subordination contrary to social equality. Loyalty was emphasized in school education until the 1990s, and the traces still remain today.
      번역하기

      In 1977, when Park Jeong-hee emphasized loyalty-filial piety in the new year inspection tour to Ministry of Education, the principle of loyalty-filial piety spread not only in the educational world but also in society as a whole. Loyalty-filial�...

      In 1977, when Park Jeong-hee emphasized loyalty-filial piety in the new year inspection tour to Ministry of Education, the principle of loyalty-filial piety spread not only in the educational world but also in society as a whole. Loyalty-filial piety was promoted as our own ideological tradition. However, the study of the history of Korean thought at that time was at a rudimentary level, and the emphasis on loyalty and filial piety was based on the Japanese Empire organized ideology of Korean Confucianism and Hwangdo Confucianism(皇道儒敎). Park Jong-Hong tried to reconstruct the history of Korean thought, but he was still unable to escape the logic of Japanese colonial ideology. Park Jong-hong's argument was generally accepted and became the academic background for emphasizing loyalty and filial piety as a policy revival.
      Loyalty-filial piety was generally recognized as a revival of the Confucian tradition, but as a modernized society, the Confucian tradition alone could not spread socially in Korea. Kim Hyung-hyo reinterpreted loyalty-filial piety as an ideology that emphasizes social authority and hierarchy by grafting it with Western thought. His argument spread to social ethics with the background of the Saemaeum movement(새마음운동) led by Park Geun-hye and the policy support for loyalty-filial piety. This was a political response to the spread of the people's movement in the 1970s, and through this, it was intended to create a vertical ruling order of rank and subordination contrary to social equality. Loyalty was emphasized in school education until the 1990s, and the traces still remain today.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-12-06 학술지명변경 한글명 : 호서사학 -> 역사와 담론
      외국어명 : HO-SUH SAHAK -> HISTORY AND DISCOURSE(Journal of Historycal Review)
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-09-29 학술지등록 한글명 : 호서사학
      외국어명 : HO-SUH SAHAK
      KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.56 0.56 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.46 0.46 0.953 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼