RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      장자의 「양생주(養生主)」와 셰익스피어의 인물 = 리어 왕과 프로스페로를 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60223313

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This essay is a comparative analysis of the two heroes of King Lear and The Tempest on the basis of Chuang Tzu’s ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life.’ Of the precious lessons of ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life,’ in particular, the main theme of a life in accordance with nature is chosen as a method to analyze both the heroes. This essay focuses upon the two heroes’ attitudes toward nature in order to induce an answer to the question, “Why do they have different endings?”
      In the first place, Lear is argued as a hero against nature though he seems. betrayed by his two unnatural daughters. The reason is that he dares to divide his kingship which has no meaning when it is broken into two as an egg and deserts his own daughter Cordelia for his own good. This essay claims that these two decisions are improper because they are against nature.
      On the other hand, this essay estimates Prospero as a hero in accordance with nature even though he uses a magic to recover his lost dukeship. To support this argument, the fact that he ultimately chooses forgiveness instead of revenge and gives up his magic staff and book is mentioned. In addition, his final attitude toward Caliban who plots to take his life functions as an essential point to prove his life conforming to nature because he accepts Caliban’ s dark side as a part of his.
      In conclusion, this essay argues that the two plays deal with a life conforming to nature in the spite of the fact that they have different endings and Lear and Prospero can be analogized by a different perspective with the help of Chuang Tzu’s thought.
      번역하기

      This essay is a comparative analysis of the two heroes of King Lear and The Tempest on the basis of Chuang Tzu’s ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life.’ Of the precious lessons of ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life,’ in particular, the main theme of a ...

      This essay is a comparative analysis of the two heroes of King Lear and The Tempest on the basis of Chuang Tzu’s ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life.’ Of the precious lessons of ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life,’ in particular, the main theme of a life in accordance with nature is chosen as a method to analyze both the heroes. This essay focuses upon the two heroes’ attitudes toward nature in order to induce an answer to the question, “Why do they have different endings?”
      In the first place, Lear is argued as a hero against nature though he seems. betrayed by his two unnatural daughters. The reason is that he dares to divide his kingship which has no meaning when it is broken into two as an egg and deserts his own daughter Cordelia for his own good. This essay claims that these two decisions are improper because they are against nature.
      On the other hand, this essay estimates Prospero as a hero in accordance with nature even though he uses a magic to recover his lost dukeship. To support this argument, the fact that he ultimately chooses forgiveness instead of revenge and gives up his magic staff and book is mentioned. In addition, his final attitude toward Caliban who plots to take his life functions as an essential point to prove his life conforming to nature because he accepts Caliban’ s dark side as a part of his.
      In conclusion, this essay argues that the two plays deal with a life conforming to nature in the spite of the fact that they have different endings and Lear and Prospero can be analogized by a different perspective with the help of Chuang Tzu’s thought.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 리어 왕과 「양생주」
      • Ⅲ. 프로스페로의 양생의 도
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 인용문헌
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 리어 왕과 「양생주」
      • Ⅲ. 프로스페로의 양생의 도
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 인용문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이경식, "템페스트" (주)문학동네 2010

      2 오강남, "우주와 인생의 깊은 뜻:장자" 현암사 1999

      3 이덕수, "앤토니와 클레오파트라" 형설출판사 1990

      4 이영준, "셰익스피어 4대 비극" 교육문화연구회 1999

      5 김태원, "리어 왕" 펭귄클래식코리아 2010

      6 김재남, "로미오와 줄리엣/ 리어왕/ 베니스의 상인" 중앙미디어 1996

      7 Goldsmith,Robert Hillis, "Wise Fools in Shakespeare" Liverpool UP 1974

      8 Shakespeare,WilliamT, "The Tempest" Arden 1999

      9 Farnham,Willard, "The Shakespearean Grotesque" Oxford UP 1971

      10 Honderich,Ted, "The Oxford Companion to Philosophy" Oxford UP 1995

      1 이경식, "템페스트" (주)문학동네 2010

      2 오강남, "우주와 인생의 깊은 뜻:장자" 현암사 1999

      3 이덕수, "앤토니와 클레오파트라" 형설출판사 1990

      4 이영준, "셰익스피어 4대 비극" 교육문화연구회 1999

      5 김태원, "리어 왕" 펭귄클래식코리아 2010

      6 김재남, "로미오와 줄리엣/ 리어왕/ 베니스의 상인" 중앙미디어 1996

      7 Goldsmith,Robert Hillis, "Wise Fools in Shakespeare" Liverpool UP 1974

      8 Shakespeare,WilliamT, "The Tempest" Arden 1999

      9 Farnham,Willard, "The Shakespearean Grotesque" Oxford UP 1971

      10 Honderich,Ted, "The Oxford Companion to Philosophy" Oxford UP 1995

      11 Welsford,Enid, "The Fool" Faber and Faber 1935

      12 Charney,Maurice, "Shakespeare’s Roman Plays" Harvard UP 1961

      13 Shakespeare,William, "Macbeth" Arden 1962

      14 Orwell, Geroge, "Lear, Tolstoy and the Fool, In Inside the Whale and Other Essays" Harmondsworth 101-119, 1957

      15 Shakespeare,William, "King Lear" Cambridge UP 1992

      16 Shakespeare,William, "Kenneth Muir" Arden 1972

      17 Neill.Michael, "Issues of Death:Morality and Identity in English Renaissance Tragedy" Clarence 1997

      18 Scragg,Leah, "Discovering Shakespeare’s Meaning" Longman 1988

      19 Shakespeare,William, "Antony and Cleopatra" Arden 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.11 0.561 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼