This essay is a comparative analysis of the two heroes of King Lear and The Tempest on the basis of Chuang Tzu’s ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life.’ Of the precious lessons of ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life,’ in particular, the main theme of a ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60223313
2012
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
387-410(24쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This essay is a comparative analysis of the two heroes of King Lear and The Tempest on the basis of Chuang Tzu’s ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life.’ Of the precious lessons of ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life,’ in particular, the main theme of a ...
This essay is a comparative analysis of the two heroes of King Lear and The Tempest on the basis of Chuang Tzu’s ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life.’ Of the precious lessons of ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life,’ in particular, the main theme of a life in accordance with nature is chosen as a method to analyze both the heroes. This essay focuses upon the two heroes’ attitudes toward nature in order to induce an answer to the question, “Why do they have different endings?”
In the first place, Lear is argued as a hero against nature though he seems. betrayed by his two unnatural daughters. The reason is that he dares to divide his kingship which has no meaning when it is broken into two as an egg and deserts his own daughter Cordelia for his own good. This essay claims that these two decisions are improper because they are against nature.
On the other hand, this essay estimates Prospero as a hero in accordance with nature even though he uses a magic to recover his lost dukeship. To support this argument, the fact that he ultimately chooses forgiveness instead of revenge and gives up his magic staff and book is mentioned. In addition, his final attitude toward Caliban who plots to take his life functions as an essential point to prove his life conforming to nature because he accepts Caliban’ s dark side as a part of his.
In conclusion, this essay argues that the two plays deal with a life conforming to nature in the spite of the fact that they have different endings and Lear and Prospero can be analogized by a different perspective with the help of Chuang Tzu’s thought.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 이경식, "템페스트" (주)문학동네 2010
2 오강남, "우주와 인생의 깊은 뜻:장자" 현암사 1999
3 이덕수, "앤토니와 클레오파트라" 형설출판사 1990
4 이영준, "셰익스피어 4대 비극" 교육문화연구회 1999
5 김태원, "리어 왕" 펭귄클래식코리아 2010
6 김재남, "로미오와 줄리엣/ 리어왕/ 베니스의 상인" 중앙미디어 1996
7 Goldsmith,Robert Hillis, "Wise Fools in Shakespeare" Liverpool UP 1974
8 Shakespeare,WilliamT, "The Tempest" Arden 1999
9 Farnham,Willard, "The Shakespearean Grotesque" Oxford UP 1971
10 Honderich,Ted, "The Oxford Companion to Philosophy" Oxford UP 1995
1 이경식, "템페스트" (주)문학동네 2010
2 오강남, "우주와 인생의 깊은 뜻:장자" 현암사 1999
3 이덕수, "앤토니와 클레오파트라" 형설출판사 1990
4 이영준, "셰익스피어 4대 비극" 교육문화연구회 1999
5 김태원, "리어 왕" 펭귄클래식코리아 2010
6 김재남, "로미오와 줄리엣/ 리어왕/ 베니스의 상인" 중앙미디어 1996
7 Goldsmith,Robert Hillis, "Wise Fools in Shakespeare" Liverpool UP 1974
8 Shakespeare,WilliamT, "The Tempest" Arden 1999
9 Farnham,Willard, "The Shakespearean Grotesque" Oxford UP 1971
10 Honderich,Ted, "The Oxford Companion to Philosophy" Oxford UP 1995
11 Welsford,Enid, "The Fool" Faber and Faber 1935
12 Charney,Maurice, "Shakespeare’s Roman Plays" Harvard UP 1961
13 Shakespeare,William, "Macbeth" Arden 1962
14 Orwell, Geroge, "Lear, Tolstoy and the Fool, In Inside the Whale and Other Essays" Harmondsworth 101-119, 1957
15 Shakespeare,William, "King Lear" Cambridge UP 1992
16 Shakespeare,William, "Kenneth Muir" Arden 1972
17 Neill.Michael, "Issues of Death:Morality and Identity in English Renaissance Tragedy" Clarence 1997
18 Scragg,Leah, "Discovering Shakespeare’s Meaning" Longman 1988
19 Shakespeare,William, "Antony and Cleopatra" Arden 2005
Yang Jung-Ung’s Korean Adapted Version of A Midsummer Night’s Dream and Its Localized Gender
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 1999-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.561 | 0.03 |