RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    노동조합의 법적 지위와 조합민주주의에 대한 제언

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99719714

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    I intended to make my suggestions in this article with regard to a legal status of a collective bargaining representative union, an union democracy, and amendment of the Labor Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act(LULRAA).
    Conclusions are as follows:
    First it is that a role of the representative union should be especially increased, extended to some extent of resolving individual disputes of labor relations. Under present labor statutes that very respect or protect an union lawfully established, I suggest that, if it is not against intension of an union member concerned, the representative union should also perform a positive role, by amendment of the Labor Standard Act(LSA) etc., in resolving of the individual disputes arising from between an employee independent of whether one is an union member or not and its employer. Even though the union is now, of course, able to take the role through a collective agreement, it may conflict with an individual dispute resolving system by the Labor Commission under the LSA.
    Second a duty of fair representation should be redressed. The DFR system is no more than prohibition of discrimination between a member of one union and a member of another union, or among unions that participated in the proceeding of election of an exclusive collective bargaining representative union. So I suggest that the representative union should take the DFR against all employees within its bargaining unit like U.S.A.
    Finally the LULRAA should be also amended, or interpreted and operated to protect or defer a substantial freedom of association, an union autonomy, a right to strike, and an expertise of the Labor Commission etc.
    번역하기

    I intended to make my suggestions in this article with regard to a legal status of a collective bargaining representative union, an union democracy, and amendment of the Labor Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act(LULRAA). Conclusions are as fol...

    I intended to make my suggestions in this article with regard to a legal status of a collective bargaining representative union, an union democracy, and amendment of the Labor Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act(LULRAA).
    Conclusions are as follows:
    First it is that a role of the representative union should be especially increased, extended to some extent of resolving individual disputes of labor relations. Under present labor statutes that very respect or protect an union lawfully established, I suggest that, if it is not against intension of an union member concerned, the representative union should also perform a positive role, by amendment of the Labor Standard Act(LSA) etc., in resolving of the individual disputes arising from between an employee independent of whether one is an union member or not and its employer. Even though the union is now, of course, able to take the role through a collective agreement, it may conflict with an individual dispute resolving system by the Labor Commission under the LSA.
    Second a duty of fair representation should be redressed. The DFR system is no more than prohibition of discrimination between a member of one union and a member of another union, or among unions that participated in the proceeding of election of an exclusive collective bargaining representative union. So I suggest that the representative union should take the DFR against all employees within its bargaining unit like U.S.A.
    Finally the LULRAA should be also amended, or interpreted and operated to protect or defer a substantial freedom of association, an union autonomy, a right to strike, and an expertise of the Labor Commission etc.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 제언배경
    • II. 노동조합의 적극적 보호
    • III. 노동조합의 자치 및 역할의 한계
    • IV. 결론에 대신하여
    • 참고문헌
    • I. 제언배경
    • II. 노동조합의 적극적 보호
    • III. 노동조합의 자치 및 역할의 한계
    • IV. 결론에 대신하여
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼