양가적 성차별 태도에 따른 성폭력 피해자에 대한 비난 차이: 강간통념의 매개효과 = The Relationships Between Ambivalent Sexism and Blame of Victim: The Role of Rape Myth

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The present study examined the relationships among adolescents' ambivalent sexism, rape myth, and blame of victim. Three hundred and sixty-one high school students(195 male and 166 female) in Changwon read two kinds of rape case scenarios and evaluated the degree of responsibility and blame which they thought should be assigned to female victim, then responded to questions on an ambivalent sexism scale and a rape myth scale, respectively. Major results of the present study were as follows: First, male students scored higher on scales measuring sexism than females did. The averages for benevolent sexism in which a student considers women as an object of affection and protection were found to be higher than the degree to which male students reported feelings of hostility as a result of their perceptions of a female student's invasion of their authority. Furthermore, males scored higher for hostile sexism than females did. The difference between males' and females' scores in terms of hostile sexism was much higher than in the case of benevolent sexism. Additionally, males were found to be more likely to accept rape myth than females did. After reading each case of rape, males tended to blame the victim more harshly, attributed more responsibility to her, and also tended to favor less severe punishment for the perpetrator than females did. Second, we studied role of rape myth between adolescents' sexism and blame of victim. Researchers found that the rape myth plays a role as a mediator. That is, adolescents scoring higher for sexism tended to accept the rape myth, and then to blame the victim more readily. Above all, it was concluded that the rape myth plays a role as a mediator only between hostile sexism and the tendency to blame the victim in female as well as male students.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "한국형 양가적 성차별주의 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구" 19 (19): 39-66, 2005

2 "필사의 저항 없으면 성폭행 아니라고" 2005

3 "청소년의 음란물 접촉과 잘못된 강간통념 수용간의 매개변인과 조정변인의 역할" 10 (10): 87-105, 2002

4 "청소년 성피해자들의 성폭력 인식과 자기손해적 성행동" 8 (8): 35-47, 2003

5 "책임판단 연구의 개관" 10 (10): 1-20, 1996

6 "적대적 성차별주의와 온정적 성차별주의가 여성 하위집단에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향 사회 및 성격" 19 (19): 117-133, 2005

7 "여성에 대한 남성의 동기와 성적 괴롭힘 간의 관계에 관한 연구" 3 (3): 133-147, 1998

8 "야한 옷차림이 성폭력 유발" 2005

9 "권위주의 성격과 사회적 편견 - 대학생집단을 중심으로" 146-168, 1989

10 "강간통념척도의 개발과 타당도 검증" 13 (13): 131-148, 1999

11 "강간통념수용도에 따른 성행동 성폭력 및 성폭행 사건 지각" 15 (15): 97-116, 2001

12 "강간통념 수용도, 성역할 태도 및 음란물 접촉 간의 관계" 11 (11): 23-40, 2005

13 "http://davidakenny.net/cm/ mediate.htm" 2005

14 "The threat of rape: Its psychological impact on non- victimized women" Oxford University Press tionary and feminist perspectives : 162-175, 1996

15 "The relationships among hostility, benevolence, and neosexism" 23 : 503-517, 1999

16 "The nature of prejudice" 1954

17 "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 1173-1182, 1986

18 "The belief in a just world" Plenum 1980

19 "The ambivalent sexism inventory:Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism" 70 : 491-512, 1996

20 "Societal influences on attribution:Blaming some victims more than others" 47 : 494-505, 1984

21 "Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths" 3 : 119-126, 2002

22 "Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity" 84 : 111-125, 2003

23 "Paternalism and conflict in gender University of California Press" 1994

24 "Gender stereotypes: Masculinity and femininity" 159-185, 2005

25 "Cross- dimension ambivalence toward social groups: Can ambivalence affect intentions to hire feminists?" 24 : 427-441, 1998

26 "Cognitive reconstruction, hindsight, and reaction to victim and perpetrators" 25 : 966-976, 1999

27 "Characterological versus behavioral self-blame:Inquiries into depression and rape" 37 : 1798-1809, 1979

28 "Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models" 290-312, 1982

29 "Are racial stereotype really fading?:The princeton triology revised" 21 : 1139-1150, 1995

30 "Are people prejudices against women? Some answers from research on attitudes and judgments of competence European Review of Social Psychology" 1-35, 1993

31 "An ambivalent alliance:hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications" 56 : 109-118, 2001

32 "(Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth" 55 : 473-489, 1999