RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    Textual Enhancement and Learner Preference in the Learning of English Articles

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82395363

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The current study investigated how learner preference would affect learning outcome in the learning of English articles through textual enhancement. Three learning types for developing English articles were presented in the survey, and comparisons were made between groups on their performance through the pretest and the posttest in the form of the grammatical judgment test. The results suggest that there were significant differences in the overuse of the and a(n) between the pretest and the posttest of some groups. Specifically, those who prefer ‘textual enhancement’ for their learning of English articles reduced their deletion ratio in the posttest more than the rest groups did. The findings suggest that textual enhancement, a kind of implicit teaching/learning method, may be beneficial for some students, but not those who prefer more explicit explanation.
    번역하기

    The current study investigated how learner preference would affect learning outcome in the learning of English articles through textual enhancement. Three learning types for developing English articles were presented in the survey, and comparisons wer...

    The current study investigated how learner preference would affect learning outcome in the learning of English articles through textual enhancement. Three learning types for developing English articles were presented in the survey, and comparisons were made between groups on their performance through the pretest and the posttest in the form of the grammatical judgment test. The results suggest that there were significant differences in the overuse of the and a(n) between the pretest and the posttest of some groups. Specifically, those who prefer ‘textual enhancement’ for their learning of English articles reduced their deletion ratio in the posttest more than the rest groups did. The findings suggest that textual enhancement, a kind of implicit teaching/learning method, may be beneficial for some students, but not those who prefer more explicit explanation.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Review of Literature
    • 3. Methodology
    • 4. Results
    • 5. Discussion and Conclusions
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Review of Literature
    • 3. Methodology
    • 4. Results
    • 5. Discussion and Conclusions
    • References
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Leow, R. P., "The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners' comprehension and intake" 13 (13): 1-16, 2003

    2 Reid, J. M., "The learning style preferences of ESL students" 21 (21): 87-111, 1987

    3 Leow, R. P., "The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition" (2) : 151-182, 1997

    4 하종범, "The Role of Meta-Awareness and Task Type on the Use of Determiners during Internet Chat" 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회 9 (9): 26-52, 2006

    5 Cherry, C. E., "The Measurement of Adult Learning Styles: Perceptual Modality" University of Tennessee 1981

    6 Celce-Murcia, M., "The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Guide" Heinle & Heinle 1999

    7 Overstreet, M. H., "The Effect of Textual Enhancement on Second Language Learner Reading Comprehension and Form Recognition" University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 2003

    8 하종범, "The Effect of Textual Enhancement for Developing English Determiners: The Role of Meta-Awareness" 한국중앙영어영문학회 47 (47): 309-334, 2005

    9 Wong, W., "Textual enhancement and simplified input: Effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form" 13 (13): 17-45, 2003

    10 Overstreet, M. H., "Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention" 2 : 229-258, 1998

    1 Leow, R. P., "The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners' comprehension and intake" 13 (13): 1-16, 2003

    2 Reid, J. M., "The learning style preferences of ESL students" 21 (21): 87-111, 1987

    3 Leow, R. P., "The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition" (2) : 151-182, 1997

    4 하종범, "The Role of Meta-Awareness and Task Type on the Use of Determiners during Internet Chat" 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회 9 (9): 26-52, 2006

    5 Cherry, C. E., "The Measurement of Adult Learning Styles: Perceptual Modality" University of Tennessee 1981

    6 Celce-Murcia, M., "The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Guide" Heinle & Heinle 1999

    7 Overstreet, M. H., "The Effect of Textual Enhancement on Second Language Learner Reading Comprehension and Form Recognition" University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 2003

    8 하종범, "The Effect of Textual Enhancement for Developing English Determiners: The Role of Meta-Awareness" 한국중앙영어영문학회 47 (47): 309-334, 2005

    9 Wong, W., "Textual enhancement and simplified input: Effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form" 13 (13): 17-45, 2003

    10 Overstreet, M. H., "Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention" 2 : 229-258, 1998

    11 Doughty, C., "Second language instruction does make a difference: evidence from an empirical study of second language relativisation" 13 (13): 431-469, 1991

    12 Zwier, L. J., "Reading for the Real World 2" Compass 2004

    13 Doughty, C., "Pedagogical Choices in Focus on Form. in: Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition" Cambridge University Press 197-261, 1998

    14 Izumi, S., "Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization" 24 : 541-577, 2002

    15 Reinert, H., "One picture is worth a thousand words? Not necessarily" 60 : 160-168, 1976

    16 Williams, J., "Memory, attention, and inductive learning" 21 : 1-48, 1999

    17 Weber, R., "Linguistic Diversity and Reading in American Society. in: Handbook of Reading Research" Longman 97-119, 1991

    18 Pienemann, M., "Learnability and Syllabus Construction. in: Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition" Multilingual Matters 23-75, 1985

    19 하종범, "Interlanguage Development of English Articles through Textual Enhancement" 현대영어교육학회 10 (10): 1-19, 2009

    20 Leeman, J., "Integrating Attention to Form with Meaning: Focus on Form in Ccontent-Based Spanish Instruction. in: Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning" University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center 217-258, 1995

    21 Sharwood-Smith, M., "Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases" 15 : 165-179, 1993

    22 Alanen, R., "Input Enhancement and Rule Presentation in Second Language Acquisition. in: Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu" University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center 259-302, 1995

    23 Master, P., "Information structure and English article pedagogy" 30 (30): 331-338, 2002

    24 White, J., "Getting the Learners' Attention: A Typographical Input Enhancement Study. in: Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition" Cambridge University Press 91-128, 1998

    25 Long, M. H., "Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology. in: Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective" John Benjamins 39-52, 1991

    26 Shook, D. J., "FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon" 5 (5): 57-93, 1994

    27 Moroishi, M., "Explicit vs. Implicit Learning: Acquisition of the Japanese Conjectural Auxiliaries under Explicit and Implicit Conditions" Aoyama Gakuin University 217-230, 1999

    28 하종범, "Enhancing Korean Students' Use of English Phrasal Verbs" 한국중원언어학회 14 (14): 191-207, 2009

    29 Lee, S.-K., "Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form" 57 (57): 87-118, 2007

    30 Jourdenais, R., "Does Textual Enhancement Promote Noticing? A Think-Aloud Protocol Analysis. in: Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu" University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center 183-216, 1995

    31 Leow,R.P, "Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2 input. An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading" 84 : 496-509, 2001

    32 Barcroft, J., "Distinctiveness and bidirectional effects in input enhancement for vocabulary learning" 13 (13): 133-160, 2003

    33 Liu, D., "Acquisition of the article the by nonnative speakers of English: An analysis of four nongeneric uses" 24 : 1-26, 2002

    34 Hakuta, K., "A case study of a Japanese child learning English as a second language" 26 : 321-351, 1976

    35 Huebner, T., "A Longitudinal Aanalysis of the Acquisition of English" Karoma 1983

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-11-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Joong Won Linguistic Society Of Korea -> The Joongwon Linguistic Society of Korea KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2008-05-14 학회명변경 한글명 : 중원언어학회 -> 한국중원언어학회
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.52 0.52 0.53
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.55 0.51 0.864 0.19
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼