RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      코경유 눈물주머니코안연결술에 사용되는 드릴의 비교 = Comparison of Drills Used in Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100523751

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: To evaluate and compare two types of microdrills that are used in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records and video recordings of 51 patients with 65 affected eyes who underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of chronic dacryocystitis or primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction at our hospital between 2005 and 2007. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. For patients in group 1 the surgeon used the Diego powered dissector (GyrusⓇ), while patients in group 2 were treated using the Ossepro (Bein AirⓇ) microdrill. Results: The operation success rate of group 1 was 96.6% and of group 2 was 94.2%. This difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The mean operation time was longer in group 1 (45.6 min) than in group 2 (65.8 min). These values, along with the mean drill usage times for each group, were significantly different (p=0.03). The mean revolution per minute(RPMs)or the two groups were also significantly different (p=0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that microdrills used in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy should have protective shields to minimize mucosal damage, and employ rapid RPMs to efficiently produce bony openings in the thick anterior processes of the maxilla. The tips of microdrills should also be exposed, to better visualize and acquire good operating fields. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2010;51(4):479-484
      번역하기

      Purpose: To evaluate and compare two types of microdrills that are used in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records and video recordings of 51 patients with 65 affected eyes who underwent endonasal dacryocy...

      Purpose: To evaluate and compare two types of microdrills that are used in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records and video recordings of 51 patients with 65 affected eyes who underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of chronic dacryocystitis or primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction at our hospital between 2005 and 2007. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. For patients in group 1 the surgeon used the Diego powered dissector (GyrusⓇ), while patients in group 2 were treated using the Ossepro (Bein AirⓇ) microdrill. Results: The operation success rate of group 1 was 96.6% and of group 2 was 94.2%. This difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The mean operation time was longer in group 1 (45.6 min) than in group 2 (65.8 min). These values, along with the mean drill usage times for each group, were significantly different (p=0.03). The mean revolution per minute(RPMs)or the two groups were also significantly different (p=0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that microdrills used in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy should have protective shields to minimize mucosal damage, and employ rapid RPMs to efficiently produce bony openings in the thick anterior processes of the maxilla. The tips of microdrills should also be exposed, to better visualize and acquire good operating fields. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2010;51(4):479-484

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권영아, "비내시경적 누낭비강문합술에서비강내공의 모양에 따른 수술 성공률" 대한안과학회 50 (50): 14-18, 2009

      2 이태수, "누소관경유 레이저누낭비강문합술의 수술 성적" 대한안과학회 45 (45): 1-1, 2004

      3 권상원, "내시경을 이용한 비강을 통한 누낭비강문합술의 임상적 고찰" 대한안과학회 45 (45): 1-1, 2004

      4 Park JD, "The factors related to surgical success rate of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy" 39 : 2848-2853, 1998

      5 Tsirbas A, "Mechanical endonasal dacryocystothinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy" 20 : 50-56, 2004

      6 Tsirbas A, "Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps" 87 : 43-47, 2003

      7 Lester SE, "Endoscopic ‘cold steel’ versus laser dacryocystorhinostomy: completing the audit cycle" 122 : 924-927, 2008

      8 Sung Wook Yoon, "Clinical Results of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy using a Microdebrider" 대한안과학회 20 (20): 1-6, 2006

      9 Lee SJ, "A clinical study on the endonasal microdrill assisted dacryocystorhinostomy" 39 : 1620-1626, 1998

      1 권영아, "비내시경적 누낭비강문합술에서비강내공의 모양에 따른 수술 성공률" 대한안과학회 50 (50): 14-18, 2009

      2 이태수, "누소관경유 레이저누낭비강문합술의 수술 성적" 대한안과학회 45 (45): 1-1, 2004

      3 권상원, "내시경을 이용한 비강을 통한 누낭비강문합술의 임상적 고찰" 대한안과학회 45 (45): 1-1, 2004

      4 Park JD, "The factors related to surgical success rate of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy" 39 : 2848-2853, 1998

      5 Tsirbas A, "Mechanical endonasal dacryocystothinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy" 20 : 50-56, 2004

      6 Tsirbas A, "Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps" 87 : 43-47, 2003

      7 Lester SE, "Endoscopic ‘cold steel’ versus laser dacryocystorhinostomy: completing the audit cycle" 122 : 924-927, 2008

      8 Sung Wook Yoon, "Clinical Results of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy using a Microdebrider" 대한안과학회 20 (20): 1-6, 2006

      9 Lee SJ, "A clinical study on the endonasal microdrill assisted dacryocystorhinostomy" 39 : 1620-1626, 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.23 0.366 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼