RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중국민법에서의 디지털 제품 하자담보책임에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Liability for Defects in Digital Products under Chinese Civil Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109682705

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In today’s digital era, digital products such as music, films, games, and cloud services have become common objects of trade. Nevertheless, the Chinese legal system has yet to establish clear regulations governing transactions involving digital products, nor has it defined explicit criteria for determining defects in such products. In particular, there remains significant ambiguity regarding the legal nature of digital products, the standards for assessing whether a digital product has quality defects, and the effective remedies available to consumers in the event of disputes arising from defective digital products. The absence of a well-defined judicial approach in this regard has limited the avenues for redress in cases involving liability for defects in digital products. To address these issues, it is imperative to first clarify the legal definition and classification of digital products within the Chinese legal framework.
    Unlike traditional physical goods, digital products may be subject to technical and functional defects rather than tangible defects, making it impractical to apply conventional criteria for defect assessment. Therefore, the definition of digital products should extend beyond physically existing goods to encompass a broad range of digital services. This expanded definition will enable the establishment of concrete standards for determining defects in digital products, with a focus on the qualitative standards of services provided to consumers.
    Furthermore, digital product providers bear various obligations in relation to the provision of services, necessitating a clear delineation of their liabilities within contractual relationships involving digital products. Additionally, explicit guidelines must be formulated to specify the remedies available to consumers in cases of defective digital products, ensuring that they have access to effective redress mechanisms. This study suggests that the establishment of such a legal framework will serve as a foundation for effectively resolving disputes arising in digital product transactions.
    번역하기

    In today’s digital era, digital products such as music, films, games, and cloud services have become common objects of trade. Nevertheless, the Chinese legal system has yet to establish clear regulations governing transactions involving digital prod...

    In today’s digital era, digital products such as music, films, games, and cloud services have become common objects of trade. Nevertheless, the Chinese legal system has yet to establish clear regulations governing transactions involving digital products, nor has it defined explicit criteria for determining defects in such products. In particular, there remains significant ambiguity regarding the legal nature of digital products, the standards for assessing whether a digital product has quality defects, and the effective remedies available to consumers in the event of disputes arising from defective digital products. The absence of a well-defined judicial approach in this regard has limited the avenues for redress in cases involving liability for defects in digital products. To address these issues, it is imperative to first clarify the legal definition and classification of digital products within the Chinese legal framework.
    Unlike traditional physical goods, digital products may be subject to technical and functional defects rather than tangible defects, making it impractical to apply conventional criteria for defect assessment. Therefore, the definition of digital products should extend beyond physically existing goods to encompass a broad range of digital services. This expanded definition will enable the establishment of concrete standards for determining defects in digital products, with a focus on the qualitative standards of services provided to consumers.
    Furthermore, digital product providers bear various obligations in relation to the provision of services, necessitating a clear delineation of their liabilities within contractual relationships involving digital products. Additionally, explicit guidelines must be formulated to specify the remedies available to consumers in cases of defective digital products, ensuring that they have access to effective redress mechanisms. This study suggests that the establishment of such a legal framework will serve as a foundation for effectively resolving disputes arising in digital product transactions.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼