배상과 화해에 관한 실증적 분석 = A Study of Empirical Analysis on Restitution and Reconciliation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is the victims themselves who suffer the most from crimes. That's why in ancient nations, offenders were mandated to offer their victims restitution; those times were what we call The Golden Age of the Victim.
Beginning around the ninth century, direct restitution by offenders to their victims cease to be practiced, mandating offenders(criminals) pay fines to the states. This made victims reduced to outsiders in legal activities; this age represents what we call the Decline of the Victim. Recently, however, there has been fresh recognition of victims' long neglected rights, thereby encouraging many countries to enact legislations on the rights and legal status of criminal victims; this movement might be correctly dubbed as the Revival of the Victim's Importance.
What criminal victims want to seek are restitution and reconciliation. In other words, victims may be enforced to make restitution to their victims, on completion of which the state can grant exemption or commutation to offenders. Some of these reconciliatory models are Victim-Offender Reconciliation Program: VORP), Family Group Conferencing, Circles, and Citizen Panels.
The success of restorative jurisdiction depends upon how successfully restitution and reconciliation can replace punishment and whether this revolutionary system can effectively prevent second offenses and facilitate criminals' re-socialization. It still remains to be seen, but there have been studies that report positive findings.
In order for restitution and reconciliation programs to be successful, its implementation should be extended from minor crimes to heavy legal offences, and active participation and willingness of the parties concerned(nation, community, victims, and offenders) are also crucial. It may not be too much to state that one of the most important duties of a country is facilitate constructive resolution of criminal cases by means of restitution and reconciliation rather than by mere punishment of legal offenders.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 배상과 화해 프로그램
• Ⅲ. 배상과 화해프로그램의 효과
• Ⅳ. 배상, 화해프로그램의 문제점과 실현가능성
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "회복적 사법에 관한 연구" 경상대학교 박사학위논문 2004.

2 "형벌로서의 배상제도에 관한 연구" 피해자학연구 1997.

3 "미국의 범죄와 형벌" 학지사 31-32, 2004

4 "回復的 司法の理念と實踐" 刑法雜誌 제41권 제2호 2002.

5 Coates, "Victim offender reconciliation programs in North America. In" Criminal Justice Press 1990.

6 "Victim offender reconciliation programs in North America. In" Criminal Justice Press 1990.

7 "Toward the rational development of restitution programming Restitution in criminal justice" Lexington DC Heath and Company 1977.

8 "Toward an evaluable program model Canadian Journal of Criminology" 1989.

9 "The unmet promise of alternatives to incarceration. Crime and Delinquency" 28 1982.

10 "The unmet promise of alternatives to incarceration Crime and Delinquency" 1982.

11 "The Victim and his Criminal" 1968.

12 "The Impact of Restorative Justice and Meadition" Criminal Justice Press 1994.

13 "Restorative and Community Justice in the United States" 27 Crime and Just 2000.

14 "Restorative Justice through Mediation" Overcrowded Times 1996.

15 "Restitution in New York State"

16 "Restitution by criminal offenders Restitution in criminal justice Lexington" DC Heath and Company 1977.

17 "Reparation to the injured and right of victims of crime compensation. London" 1990.

18 "Principles of criminology" Lippincott 1960.

19 "Offender restitution in theory and action" Lexington DC Heath and Company 1978.

20 "Offender restitution in theory and action" Lexington DC Heath and Company 1978.

21 "National Survey of Victim-Offender Mediation Programs in the United States" 2000.

22 "Legal and operational issues in the implementation of restitution within the Criminal Justice System" Lexington DC Heath and Company 1977.

23 "Le retour des victimes" Le Monde des dbats 2000.6.

24 "La Rparation, Paris" Paris Gallimard 1999.

25 "Juvenile Justice in America" Macmillan Publishing Company 1991.

26 "Evaluating Restorative Justice Practices, in : HirshRobertsBottomsRoach and Schiff(ed.) Restorative Justice & Criminal Justice" Hart Publishing 2003.

27 "Du Culte des hros la concurrence des victims" crimi (crimi): 2000.

28 "Du Culte des hros la concurrence des victimes" crimi 33 (crimi 33): 2000.

29 "Die Rechtswirklichkeit und prventive Effizianz strafrechtlicher Sanktionen Kriminalprvention und Strafjustiz" 1996.

30 "Annotated Bibliography of Empirical Studies on Mediation University of Minnesota" 2003.

31 "An evaluation of a victim restitution program Paper presented at the ASC Meeting" 1988.

32 "An Evaluation of Community Conferencing: The Central City Neighborhoods Partnership Restorative Justice Program" Unpublished manuscript 1999.

33 "A new paradigm of criminal justice or a new way to widen the net of social control? Ann Arber" University Microfilms 1989.

34 "A Theoretical Study and Critique of Restorative Justice edited by Burt Galaway and Joe Hudson" Criminal Justice Press 1996.