RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      보철 치료 시 디지털 및 전통적 인상채득에 대한 환자 만족도 비교 연구 = Comparison of patient satisfaction with digital and conventional impression for prosthodontic treatment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102438601

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The present study aims at researching the subjective satisfaction of patients who have experienced both conventional impression taking and digital impression taking to measure the possibility of wide clinical application of digital impression. Materials and methods: The study surveyed 170 adult patients over the age of 20, between October 2015 and April 2016, who voluntarily consented to participation and who experienced both conventional impression and digital impression at five dental hospitals that use intraoral digital impression. A total of 128 surveys were used for data analysis, involving frequency analysis, multiple response frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, and contingency table analysis, with the significance level set at 0.05. Results: Responses on the reason for taking impressions using the digital method appeared in the order of 'for implant treatment' (43.8%), 'for crown treatment' (30.5%), and 'for inlay treatment' (15.6%). Patients satisfaction was higher for digital impression taking than conventional impression taking (P<.05). As the preferred choice of impression, digital impression (60.2%) was higher than conventional impression (11.7%). Responses on the reason for choosing digital impression taking appeared in the order of 'no vomiting reflex' (35.1%), 'reliability of 3D digital scanning' (33.8%), and 'short time' (33.8%). Conclusion: The patients preferred digital impression taking to conventional impression taking in terms of satisfaction.
      번역하기

      Purpose: The present study aims at researching the subjective satisfaction of patients who have experienced both conventional impression taking and digital impression taking to measure the possibility of wide clinical application of digital impression...

      Purpose: The present study aims at researching the subjective satisfaction of patients who have experienced both conventional impression taking and digital impression taking to measure the possibility of wide clinical application of digital impression. Materials and methods: The study surveyed 170 adult patients over the age of 20, between October 2015 and April 2016, who voluntarily consented to participation and who experienced both conventional impression and digital impression at five dental hospitals that use intraoral digital impression. A total of 128 surveys were used for data analysis, involving frequency analysis, multiple response frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, and contingency table analysis, with the significance level set at 0.05. Results: Responses on the reason for taking impressions using the digital method appeared in the order of 'for implant treatment' (43.8%), 'for crown treatment' (30.5%), and 'for inlay treatment' (15.6%). Patients satisfaction was higher for digital impression taking than conventional impression taking (P<.05). As the preferred choice of impression, digital impression (60.2%) was higher than conventional impression (11.7%). Responses on the reason for choosing digital impression taking appeared in the order of 'no vomiting reflex' (35.1%), 'reliability of 3D digital scanning' (33.8%), and 'short time' (33.8%). Conclusion: The patients preferred digital impression taking to conventional impression taking in terms of satisfaction.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최종훈, "현재 존재하는 구강 스캐너에 대한 고찰" 대한턱관절교합학회 31 (31): 112-125, 2015

      2 김려운, "치과 디지털 인상의 이해와 적용" 대한치과재료학회 41 (41): 253-261, 2014

      3 이경탁, "백색광 스캐너를 기반으로 채득된 디지털 모형의 스캐닝 방법에 따른 정확성 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2013

      4 표세욱, "디지털 인상채득 및 CAD/CAM을 이용한 상악 전치부 보철물 제작과 기존 방식 보철물과의 임상적 비교" 대한치과보철학회 49 (49): 263-269, 2011

      5 홍용신, "구강 내 디지털 인상채득을 통한 맞춤형 지대주와 시멘트 합착 후 나사형 임플란트 보철 수복 증례" 대한치과보철학회 50 (50): 67-73, 2012

      6 김재홍, "구강 내 디지털 인상채득기법으로 제작된 치과용 모형의 정확성과 신뢰성에 관한 연구 : iTero™ system 이용" 고려대학교 대학원 2012

      7 김재홍, "구강 내 디지털 이미지 평가와 전부도재관의 적합도에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2014

      8 Christensen GJ, "Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions?" 139 : 761-763, 2008

      9 Stevens DR, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements" 129 : 794-803, 2006

      10 Christensen GJ, "The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement" 136 : 343-346, 2005

      1 최종훈, "현재 존재하는 구강 스캐너에 대한 고찰" 대한턱관절교합학회 31 (31): 112-125, 2015

      2 김려운, "치과 디지털 인상의 이해와 적용" 대한치과재료학회 41 (41): 253-261, 2014

      3 이경탁, "백색광 스캐너를 기반으로 채득된 디지털 모형의 스캐닝 방법에 따른 정확성 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2013

      4 표세욱, "디지털 인상채득 및 CAD/CAM을 이용한 상악 전치부 보철물 제작과 기존 방식 보철물과의 임상적 비교" 대한치과보철학회 49 (49): 263-269, 2011

      5 홍용신, "구강 내 디지털 인상채득을 통한 맞춤형 지대주와 시멘트 합착 후 나사형 임플란트 보철 수복 증례" 대한치과보철학회 50 (50): 67-73, 2012

      6 김재홍, "구강 내 디지털 인상채득기법으로 제작된 치과용 모형의 정확성과 신뢰성에 관한 연구 : iTero™ system 이용" 고려대학교 대학원 2012

      7 김재홍, "구강 내 디지털 이미지 평가와 전부도재관의 적합도에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2014

      8 Christensen GJ, "Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions?" 139 : 761-763, 2008

      9 Stevens DR, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements" 129 : 794-803, 2006

      10 Christensen GJ, "The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement" 136 : 343-346, 2005

      11 Abdel-Azim T, "The influence of digital fabrication options on the accuracy of dental implant-based single units and complete-arch frameworks" 29 : 1281-1288, 2014

      12 Nedelcu RG, "Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis" 112 : 1461-1471, 2014

      13 Wismeijer D, "Patients'preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants" 25 : 1113-1118, 2014

      14 Souza RO, "Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system" 21 : 94-100, 2012

      15 Kim KM, "Likert scale" 32 : 1-2, 2011

      16 Christensen GJ, "Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling" 140 : 1301-1304, 2009

      17 이완선, "Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions" 대한치과보철학회 6 (6): 22-29, 2014

      18 An S, "Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner" 112 : 1171-1175, 2014

      19 Linke BA, "Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials" 54 : 794-802, 1985

      20 Lee SJ, "Digital vs. conventional implant impressions:efficiency outcomes" 24 : 111-115, 2013

      21 Jo HY, "Comparison of the accuracy with digital impression system and conventional impression technique" Graduate School of Yonsei University 2012

      22 Kim SR, "Comparison of parallel confocal laser scanning impression with conventional silicone impression regarding the marginal fitness and internal fitness of zirconia core" Graduate school of Korea University 2011

      23 Kim J, "Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners" 116 : 221-230, 2016

      24 Luthardt RG, "Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial" 21 : 322-327, 2008

      25 Bindl A, "Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns" 111 : 163-169, 2003

      26 Park HR, "Changes in views on digital intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training in digital impression taking" 15 : 151-, 2015

      27 Duret F, "CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry" 1 : 150-154, 1991

      28 van der Meer WJ, "Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology" 7 : e43312-, 2012

      29 Lee SJ, "An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions" 110 : 420-423, 2013

      30 Papaspyridakos P, "Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review" 29 : 836-845, 2014

      31 Seelbach P, "Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow" 17 : 1759-1764, 2013

      32 Bae JW, "A study on the color reproduction of digital intraoral scanner" Graduate school of Ewha Womans University 2014

      33 Ji-won Anh, "A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction" 대한치과교정학회 46 (46): 3-12, 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.21 0.21 0.353 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼