RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      영어 어두 약음절에서의 모음 탈락 양상: 코퍼스 연구 = Aspects of English Syncope in a Word-Initial Unstressed Syllable: A Corpus Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105975418

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is well known that a schwa in an unstressed syllable is weakened and thus commonly deleted in English. Such syncope even applies to a word-initial syllable that is prosodically strong. Sonority of adjacent consonants and lexical frequency were known to determine the deletion of a schwa. Such an argument, however, has been controversial and little is known about the relationship with other variables. The goal of this study is to investigate the factors and their relationship in schwa deletion. Results showed that sonority and lexical frequency played important roles in English syncope. However, once conditions were met, exposure frequency about the consonant sequences after syncope played the most crucial role.
      번역하기

      It is well known that a schwa in an unstressed syllable is weakened and thus commonly deleted in English. Such syncope even applies to a word-initial syllable that is prosodically strong. Sonority of adjacent consonants and lexical frequency were know...

      It is well known that a schwa in an unstressed syllable is weakened and thus commonly deleted in English. Such syncope even applies to a word-initial syllable that is prosodically strong. Sonority of adjacent consonants and lexical frequency were known to determine the deletion of a schwa. Such an argument, however, has been controversial and little is known about the relationship with other variables. The goal of this study is to investigate the factors and their relationship in schwa deletion. Results showed that sonority and lexical frequency played important roles in English syncope. However, once conditions were met, exposure frequency about the consonant sequences after syncope played the most crucial role.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Leech, Geoffrey, "Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English" Pearson Education 2001

      2 Crosswhite, Katherine, "Vowel Reduction in Optimality Theory" Routledge 2001

      3 송지은, "Variable Schwa Deletion in English: A Corpus Study" 한국음운론학회 19 (19): 33-52, 2013

      4 Glowacka, Dorota, "Unstressed Vowel Deletion and New Consonant Clusters in English" 37 : 71-94, 2001

      5 Selkirk, Elizabeth, "The Role of Prosodic Categories in English Word Stress" 11 : 563-605, 1980

      6 Fokes, Joann, "The Elusive/illusive Syllable" 50 : 102-123, 1993

      7 Kahn, Daniel, "Syllable-Based Generalizations in English Phonology" MIT 1976

      8 Bald, Wolf-Dietrich, "Studies in the Pronunciation of English" Routledge 317-322, 1990

      9 Lodge, Ken, "Studies in the Phonology of Colloquial English" Croon Helm 1984

      10 Zec, Draga, "Sonority Constraints on Syllable Structure" 12 : 85-29, 1995

      1 Leech, Geoffrey, "Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English" Pearson Education 2001

      2 Crosswhite, Katherine, "Vowel Reduction in Optimality Theory" Routledge 2001

      3 송지은, "Variable Schwa Deletion in English: A Corpus Study" 한국음운론학회 19 (19): 33-52, 2013

      4 Glowacka, Dorota, "Unstressed Vowel Deletion and New Consonant Clusters in English" 37 : 71-94, 2001

      5 Selkirk, Elizabeth, "The Role of Prosodic Categories in English Word Stress" 11 : 563-605, 1980

      6 Fokes, Joann, "The Elusive/illusive Syllable" 50 : 102-123, 1993

      7 Kahn, Daniel, "Syllable-Based Generalizations in English Phonology" MIT 1976

      8 Bald, Wolf-Dietrich, "Studies in the Pronunciation of English" Routledge 317-322, 1990

      9 Lodge, Ken, "Studies in the Phonology of Colloquial English" Croon Helm 1984

      10 Zec, Draga, "Sonority Constraints on Syllable Structure" 12 : 85-29, 1995

      11 류나영, "Schwa deletion in the conversational speech of English: The role of linguistic factors" 언어정보연구소 30 (30): 313-333, 2013

      12 이학식, "SPSS 24 매뉴얼" 집현재 2013

      13 Hooper, Joan B., "Recent Developments in Historical Phonology" Mouton Publishers 183-207, 1978

      14 McCarthy, John, "Prosodic Morphology: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction" University of Massachusetts at Amherst 1993

      15 Laver, John, "Principles of Phonetics" Cambridge University Press 1994

      16 Beckman, Jill N., "Positional Faithfulness" University of Massachusetts at Amherst 1998

      17 Zoll, Cheryl, "Positional Asymmetries and Licensing" Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1998

      18 Kenstowicz, Michael, "Phonology in Generative Grammar" Blackwell 1994

      19 Bybee, Joan, "Phonology and Language Use" Cambridge University Press 2001

      20 Smith, Jennifer L., "Phonological Augmentation in Prominent Positions" University of Massachusetts at Amherst 2002

      21 Dalby, Marler J., "Phonetic Structure of Fast Speech in American English" Indiana University 1984

      22 Clements, George N., "Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech" Cambridge University Press 283-333, 1990

      23 Prince, Alan, "Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar" Blackwell 2004

      24 Selkirk, Elizabeth, "On Prosodic Structure and Its Relation to Syntactic Structure" Indiana University Linguistics Club 1980

      25 Hyman, Larry, M., "Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday" Anma Libri 107-118, 1976

      26 Zwicky, Arnold, "Linguistic Change and Generative Theory" 275-301, 1972

      27 Selkirk, Elizabeth, "Language Sound Structure: Studies in Phonology" MIT Press 107-136, 1984

      28 Francis, Nelson W., "Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar" Houghton Mifflin 1982

      29 Alderete, John, "Faithfulness to Prosodic Heads" University of Massachusetts at Amherst 1995

      30 McCarthy, John, "Extensions of Faithfulness: Rotuman Revisited" University of Massachusetts at Amherst 1995

      31 Pitt, Mark A., "Exploring the Role of Exposure Frequency in Recognizing Pronunciation Variants" 39 : 304-311, 2011

      32 Patterson, David, "Corpora Analyses of Frequency of Schwa Deletion in Conversational American English" 60 : 45-69, 2003

      33 Pitt, Mark A., "Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech (2nd release)" Department of Psychology, Ohio State University 2007

      34 Cho, Taehong, "Articulatory and Acoustic Studies of Domain-Initial Strengthening in Korean" 97 : 100-138, 1999

      35 Byrd, Dani, "Articulatory Vowel Lengthening and Coordination at Phrasal Junctures" 57 : 3-16, 2000

      36 Yavas, Mehmet, "Applied English Phonology" John Wiley and Sons 2016

      37 Stuart Davis, "Ambiguous Syllabification in English: Foot Structure and the Schwa Syncope Problem" 한국언어과학회 25 (25): 315-330, 2018

      38 Ladefoged, Peter, "A Course in Phonetics" Wadsworth 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-04-24 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Linguistic Science Society KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.35 0.35 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.34 0.35 0.608 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼