RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중세 말 베네치아의 해상 네트워크 = Venice's Maritime Networks in the Later Middle Ages

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103997451

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article aims to assess the level and dimension of the sea-borne communications between the ports by analysing Venice's maritime networks in the Later Middle Ages. Venice's maritime networks were an first-class infrastructure on the basis of which men, merchandises, news, lots of information were circulated. Until recently historians have viewed Venice's maritime networks mainly in the economic terms, i.e. a means of transportation. However, an effort should be made consider them in terms of the circulations of news, information, or communication.
      The Later Middle Ages saw that Venice's maritime networks were expanded. It was the city government which took the initiative in their expansion. In about 1300 the Venetian government established the system of the official convoys, which navigated in accordance with the timetables established by the city state. The Venetian official convoys called at most of major ports in the Mediterranean, the Black Sea and the Atlantic ocean. However, the Venetian official convoys made a long distance navigation just once or twice a year.
      The close scrutiny of merchants' correspondence reveals the fact that they exchanged the letters more frequently than the annual one or two passages of venetian official convoys that were in charge of a lion's share of the Venetian transportation of merchandises. In actuality, the communications by letters between Venice and other great maritime ports such as Barcelona, London, Bruges, and Acre was effectuated at least once or twice a month. The absence of the official convoys means that the transmissions of letters were inevitably done by the private ships. Thus it is necessary to rectify at least partly the prevailing opinion that the private ships made an negligible role in the Venetian transport systems.
      At the same time an emphasis should be put on the fact that the Venetian maritime networks were exceptionally rapid and extensively stretched out in the Later Middle Ages, when the frequency and intensity of the habitual communication with the exterior worlds in the medieval European societies was low and weak. And yet it should also be remembered that many parts in the Occident were still isolated from the developed maritime networks such as Venetian ones.
      번역하기

      This article aims to assess the level and dimension of the sea-borne communications between the ports by analysing Venice's maritime networks in the Later Middle Ages. Venice's maritime networks were an first-class infrastructure on the basis of which...

      This article aims to assess the level and dimension of the sea-borne communications between the ports by analysing Venice's maritime networks in the Later Middle Ages. Venice's maritime networks were an first-class infrastructure on the basis of which men, merchandises, news, lots of information were circulated. Until recently historians have viewed Venice's maritime networks mainly in the economic terms, i.e. a means of transportation. However, an effort should be made consider them in terms of the circulations of news, information, or communication.
      The Later Middle Ages saw that Venice's maritime networks were expanded. It was the city government which took the initiative in their expansion. In about 1300 the Venetian government established the system of the official convoys, which navigated in accordance with the timetables established by the city state. The Venetian official convoys called at most of major ports in the Mediterranean, the Black Sea and the Atlantic ocean. However, the Venetian official convoys made a long distance navigation just once or twice a year.
      The close scrutiny of merchants' correspondence reveals the fact that they exchanged the letters more frequently than the annual one or two passages of venetian official convoys that were in charge of a lion's share of the Venetian transportation of merchandises. In actuality, the communications by letters between Venice and other great maritime ports such as Barcelona, London, Bruges, and Acre was effectuated at least once or twice a month. The absence of the official convoys means that the transmissions of letters were inevitably done by the private ships. Thus it is necessary to rectify at least partly the prevailing opinion that the private ships made an negligible role in the Venetian transport systems.
      At the same time an emphasis should be put on the fact that the Venetian maritime networks were exceptionally rapid and extensively stretched out in the Later Middle Ages, when the frequency and intensity of the habitual communication with the exterior worlds in the medieval European societies was low and weak. And yet it should also be remembered that many parts in the Occident were still isolated from the developed maritime networks such as Venetian ones.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article aims to assess the level and dimension of the sea-borne communications between the ports by analysing Venice's maritime networks in the Later Middle Ages. Venice's maritime networks were an first-class infrastructure on the basis of which men, merchandises, news, lots of information were circulated. Until recently historians have viewed Venice's maritime networks mainly in the economic terms, i.e. a means of transportation. However, an effort should be made consider them in terms of the circulations of news, information, or communication.
      The Later Middle Ages saw that Venice's maritime networks were expanded. It was the city government which took the initiative in their expansion. In about 1300 the Venetian government established the system of the official convoys, which navigated in accordance with the timetables established by the city state. The Venetian official convoys called at most of major ports in the Mediterranean, the Black Sea and the Atlantic ocean. However, the Venetian official convoys made a long distance navigation just once or twice a year.
      The close scrutiny of merchants' correspondence reveals the fact that they exchanged the letters more frequently than the annual one or two passages of venetian official convoys that were in charge of a lion's share of the Venetian transportation of merchandises. In actuality, the communications by letters between Venice and other great maritime ports such as Barcelona, London, Bruges, and Acre was effectuated at least once or twice a month. The absence of the official convoys means that the transmissions of letters were inevitably done by the private ships. Thus it is necessary to rectify at least partly the prevailing opinion that the private ships made an negligible role in the Venetian transport systems.
      At the same time an emphasis should be put on the fact that the Venetian maritime networks were exceptionally rapid and extensively stretched out in the Later Middle Ages, when the frequency and intensity of the habitual communication with the exterior worlds in the medieval European societies was low and weak. And yet it should also be remembered that many parts in the Occident were still isolated from the developed maritime networks such as Venetian ones.
      번역하기

      This article aims to assess the level and dimension of the sea-borne communications between the ports by analysing Venice's maritime networks in the Later Middle Ages. Venice's maritime networks were an first-class infrastructure on the basis of which...

      This article aims to assess the level and dimension of the sea-borne communications between the ports by analysing Venice's maritime networks in the Later Middle Ages. Venice's maritime networks were an first-class infrastructure on the basis of which men, merchandises, news, lots of information were circulated. Until recently historians have viewed Venice's maritime networks mainly in the economic terms, i.e. a means of transportation. However, an effort should be made consider them in terms of the circulations of news, information, or communication.
      The Later Middle Ages saw that Venice's maritime networks were expanded. It was the city government which took the initiative in their expansion. In about 1300 the Venetian government established the system of the official convoys, which navigated in accordance with the timetables established by the city state. The Venetian official convoys called at most of major ports in the Mediterranean, the Black Sea and the Atlantic ocean. However, the Venetian official convoys made a long distance navigation just once or twice a year.
      The close scrutiny of merchants' correspondence reveals the fact that they exchanged the letters more frequently than the annual one or two passages of venetian official convoys that were in charge of a lion's share of the Venetian transportation of merchandises. In actuality, the communications by letters between Venice and other great maritime ports such as Barcelona, London, Bruges, and Acre was effectuated at least once or twice a month. The absence of the official convoys means that the transmissions of letters were inevitably done by the private ships. Thus it is necessary to rectify at least partly the prevailing opinion that the private ships made an negligible role in the Venetian transport systems.
      At the same time an emphasis should be put on the fact that the Venetian maritime networks were exceptionally rapid and extensively stretched out in the Later Middle Ages, when the frequency and intensity of the habitual communication with the exterior worlds in the medieval European societies was low and weak. And yet it should also be remembered that many parts in the Occident were still isolated from the developed maritime networks such as Venetian ones.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 남종국, "상업 기록 속의 중세 이탈리아 상인과 상업세계" 한국서양중세사학회 (18) : 129-163, 2006

      2 Archivio di Stato di Prato, "fondo di Datini, busta 927, 928"

      3 R. Mantran, "Venise, centre d'information sur les Turcs, in : Venezia centro di mediazione tra Oriente e Occidente (secoli XV-XVI)" 111-116, 1977

      4 F. C. Lane, "Venice: a maritime republic (Baltimore, 1973)"

      5 F. C. Lane, "Venice and history. The collected papers of Frederic C. Lane (Baltimore, 1966)"

      6 B. Arbel, "Venetian trade in fifteenth century Acre: the letters of Francesco Bevilaqua (1471-1472)" 22 : 227-288, 1988

      7 F. C. Lane, "Venetian ships and shipbuilders of the Renaissance (Baltimore, 1934)"

      8 Archivio di Stato di Venezia, "Ufficiali sopra le mercanzie del Levante, reg. 1"

      9 E. Ashtor, "The venetian supremacy in levantine trade: monopoly or pre-colonialism" 3 : 5-53, 1974

      10 M. E. Mallet, "The florentine galleys in the Fifteenth century (Oxford, 1967)"

      1 남종국, "상업 기록 속의 중세 이탈리아 상인과 상업세계" 한국서양중세사학회 (18) : 129-163, 2006

      2 Archivio di Stato di Prato, "fondo di Datini, busta 927, 928"

      3 R. Mantran, "Venise, centre d'information sur les Turcs, in : Venezia centro di mediazione tra Oriente e Occidente (secoli XV-XVI)" 111-116, 1977

      4 F. C. Lane, "Venice: a maritime republic (Baltimore, 1973)"

      5 F. C. Lane, "Venice and history. The collected papers of Frederic C. Lane (Baltimore, 1966)"

      6 B. Arbel, "Venetian trade in fifteenth century Acre: the letters of Francesco Bevilaqua (1471-1472)" 22 : 227-288, 1988

      7 F. C. Lane, "Venetian ships and shipbuilders of the Renaissance (Baltimore, 1934)"

      8 Archivio di Stato di Venezia, "Ufficiali sopra le mercanzie del Levante, reg. 1"

      9 E. Ashtor, "The venetian supremacy in levantine trade: monopoly or pre-colonialism" 3 : 5-53, 1974

      10 M. E. Mallet, "The florentine galleys in the Fifteenth century (Oxford, 1967)"

      11 Archivio di Stato di Venezia, "Senato Misti, reg. 56, 58"

      12 Archivio di Stato di Venezia, "Senato Mar, reg. 10"

      13 Archivio di Stato di Venezia, "Procuratori di San Marco, Commissarie miste, busta 116, 117.?"

      14 Archivio di Stato di Venezia, "Procuratori di San Marco, Commissarie di Citra, busta 282"

      15 E. A. Congdon, "Private venetian ships and shipping c. 1400" 10 : 57-71, 1998

      16 P. Spufford, "Power and profit. The merchant in medieval Europe (New York, 2002)"

      17 Robert C. Davis, "Pilgrim-tourism in late Medieval Venice" the contours of medieval and early modern Italy 119-132, 2003

      18 B. Doumerc, "Par Dieu ecrivez plus souvent ! La lettre d'affaires a Venise a la fin du Moyen Age" La circulation des nouvelles au Moyen Age 99-109, 1994

      19 P. Sardella, "Nouvelles et sp?ulations ?Venise au d?ut du XVIe si?le (Paris, 1948)"

      20 Archivio di Stato di Venezia, "Miscellanea Gregolin, busta 14"

      21 E. Vallet, "Marchands v?itiens en Syrie ?la fin du XVe si?le (Paris, 1999)"

      22 J. Le Goff, "Marchands et banquiers du Moyen Age (Paris, 1980)"

      23 E. Ashtor, "Levantine alkali ashes and european industries" 12 : 475-522, 1983

      24 E. Ashtor, "Levant trade in the Later Middle Ages (Princeton, 1983)"

      25 B. Doumerc, "Les flottes d'Etat, moyen de domination coloniale pour Venise (XVe siecle)" Coloniser au Moyen Age 115-126, 1995

      26 D. Stockly, "Le systeme de l’incanto des galees du marche a Venise (fin XIIIe ? milieu XVe siecle) (Leiden-New York-Cologne, 1995)"

      27 J.-C. Hocquet, "Le sel et la fortune de Venise 2 vol. (Lille, 1978-1979)"

      28 남종국, "Le commerce du coton en Mediterranee a la fin du Moyen Age (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007)"

      29 M. Balard, "La circulation des nouvelles au Moyen Age (Paris, 1994)"

      30 F. Melis, "Intensita e regolarita nella diffusione dell'informazione economica generale nel Mediterraneo e in Occidente alla fine del Medioevo" I trasporti e le comunicazioni nel Medioevo 179-223, 1984

      31 U. Tucci, "Il commercio del vino nell'economia cretese" Venezia e Creta 183-206, 1998

      32 W. Heyd, "Histoire du commerce du Levant?2 vol. (Leipzig, 1885-1186)"

      33 Archivio di Stato di Venezia, "Guidici di petizion, Sentenze a giustizia, reg, 106, 111, 176"

      34 P. Burke, "Early modern Venice as a center of information and communication" the history and civilization of an italian city-state 389-419, 2000

      35 F. Melis, "Documenti per la storia economica dei secoli XIII-XVI (Firenze, 1972)"

      36 F. C. Lane, "Andrea Barbarigo: merchant of Venice, 1418-1449 (Baltimore, 1944)"

      37 J. E. Dotson, "A problem of cotton and lead in medieval italian shipping" 57 : 52-62, 1982

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.21 0.21 0.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.21 0.807 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼