RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The Effect of Self-Construal on Continued Intention of Conversational AI Agent : The Boundary Condition of Mind Perception

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17074033

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      With the increasing maturity of smart technologies, enterprises are increasingly using text-based chatbots for online service interactions, while at the same time people are gradually adapting and trying to integrate conversational bots (or conversational AI) into their daily lives. Thanks to advances in AI, mobile, cloud, big data, and biometrics, conversational AI can provide services similar to human interactions, with great potential to reduce social risks and improve user experience. However, recent research suggests that users are still sceptical about conversational AI, as evidenced by a mixed willingness to interact with it, and that features of conversational AI may resonate differently with different users. Previous studies have shown that associating products with consumers’ selves affects product memory, judgement and choice. Therefore, in this study, we drew on the I-PACE interaction model to explore the relationship between self-construal cues based on users’ individual differences and conversational AI use intention based on self-construal theories and related theories in social psychology, focusing on the emotional mechanisms (e.g., social anxiety and loneliness) employed by the individual-influenced technology of interdependent self (vs. independent self), and further discusses the moderating role of people’s perceptions of thinking on the above relationships. Based on the current state of research, this paper poses three research questions: whether people’s intention to use conversational AI is affected by their different individual self-construal and whether they differ; through what mental pathways do different individual self-construal indirectly affect people’s intention to use conversational AI; and how does the perception of thought as a human-like mental state in relation to a non-human agent regulate the above influence processes. The research was carried out in the following aspects: firstly, the main question of the study was formulated by exploring the application of conversational AI in daily life and the related theoretical background, i.e., exploring the relationship between self-construals and the intention to use conversational AI, as well as the influencing factors of the relationship. Secondly, the objectives and significance of the study are clarified. Through empirical research, the relationship between individual consumers’ self- construal and conversational AI usage intention is explored in depth, and the psychological mechanism is revealed. In terms of theoretical and practical significance, by revealing the relationship between self-consturals and conversational AI usage intention, the theory of self-concept and the theory of consumer behaviour can be further enriched. In addition, the results of the study provide companies as well as practitioners with strategies regarding the design and promotion of conversational AI products to enhance user experience as well as satisfaction. Thirdly, for the methodological and analytical aspects of the study, situations will be manipulated and simulated experimentally to guide consumers to evoke interdependent and independent self-construal in order to observe their intention to use as well as their mind perceptions. The findings reality that individuals with interdependent selves have higher intention to use conversational AI compared to independent selves. This is caused by the serially mediation of social anxiety and loneliness. In addition, the mind perception increased the relationship between social anxiety and conversational AI use intention. Through this study, we have enriched the application of self-construal theory to new technological domains by combining self-construal theory with conversational AI. The study examined the mediating as well as moderating roles of social anxiety, loneliness, and mind perceptions in the relationship between self-construals and conversational AI use intentions, filling a gap in existing research in this area. At the same time, the study raises two research questions about how mind perception moderates the effects of self-construal on conversational AI use intention, and how mind perception moderates the effects of self-construal on conversational AI use intention through social anxiety and loneliness. This study aims to fill the research gap in the related field and provide theoretical as well as practical guidance for further exploring consumers’ usage behaviors and psychological factors of conversational AI.
      번역하기

      With the increasing maturity of smart technologies, enterprises are increasingly using text-based chatbots for online service interactions, while at the same time people are gradually adapting and trying to integrate conversational bots (or conversati...

      With the increasing maturity of smart technologies, enterprises are increasingly using text-based chatbots for online service interactions, while at the same time people are gradually adapting and trying to integrate conversational bots (or conversational AI) into their daily lives. Thanks to advances in AI, mobile, cloud, big data, and biometrics, conversational AI can provide services similar to human interactions, with great potential to reduce social risks and improve user experience. However, recent research suggests that users are still sceptical about conversational AI, as evidenced by a mixed willingness to interact with it, and that features of conversational AI may resonate differently with different users. Previous studies have shown that associating products with consumers’ selves affects product memory, judgement and choice. Therefore, in this study, we drew on the I-PACE interaction model to explore the relationship between self-construal cues based on users’ individual differences and conversational AI use intention based on self-construal theories and related theories in social psychology, focusing on the emotional mechanisms (e.g., social anxiety and loneliness) employed by the individual-influenced technology of interdependent self (vs. independent self), and further discusses the moderating role of people’s perceptions of thinking on the above relationships. Based on the current state of research, this paper poses three research questions: whether people’s intention to use conversational AI is affected by their different individual self-construal and whether they differ; through what mental pathways do different individual self-construal indirectly affect people’s intention to use conversational AI; and how does the perception of thought as a human-like mental state in relation to a non-human agent regulate the above influence processes. The research was carried out in the following aspects: firstly, the main question of the study was formulated by exploring the application of conversational AI in daily life and the related theoretical background, i.e., exploring the relationship between self-construals and the intention to use conversational AI, as well as the influencing factors of the relationship. Secondly, the objectives and significance of the study are clarified. Through empirical research, the relationship between individual consumers’ self- construal and conversational AI usage intention is explored in depth, and the psychological mechanism is revealed. In terms of theoretical and practical significance, by revealing the relationship between self-consturals and conversational AI usage intention, the theory of self-concept and the theory of consumer behaviour can be further enriched. In addition, the results of the study provide companies as well as practitioners with strategies regarding the design and promotion of conversational AI products to enhance user experience as well as satisfaction. Thirdly, for the methodological and analytical aspects of the study, situations will be manipulated and simulated experimentally to guide consumers to evoke interdependent and independent self-construal in order to observe their intention to use as well as their mind perceptions. The findings reality that individuals with interdependent selves have higher intention to use conversational AI compared to independent selves. This is caused by the serially mediation of social anxiety and loneliness. In addition, the mind perception increased the relationship between social anxiety and conversational AI use intention. Through this study, we have enriched the application of self-construal theory to new technological domains by combining self-construal theory with conversational AI. The study examined the mediating as well as moderating roles of social anxiety, loneliness, and mind perceptions in the relationship between self-construals and conversational AI use intentions, filling a gap in existing research in this area. At the same time, the study raises two research questions about how mind perception moderates the effects of self-construal on conversational AI use intention, and how mind perception moderates the effects of self-construal on conversational AI use intention through social anxiety and loneliness. This study aims to fill the research gap in the related field and provide theoretical as well as practical guidance for further exploring consumers’ usage behaviors and psychological factors of conversational AI.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Research Background and Questions 1
      • 1.1.1 Practical Background 1
      • 1.1.2 Theoretical Background 3
      • 1.2 Research Objective and Significance 7
      • Ⅰ. Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Research Background and Questions 1
      • 1.1.1 Practical Background 1
      • 1.1.2 Theoretical Background 3
      • 1.2 Research Objective and Significance 7
      • 1.2.1 Research Objective 7
      • 1.2.2 Research Significance 9
      • 1.3 Research Framework and Methods 12
      • 1.4 Research Innovations 13
      • 1.5 Chapter Summary 15
      • Ⅱ. Literature Review 16
      • 2.1 Self-construal Theory 16
      • 2.1.1 The Concept of Self-construal 16
      • 2.1.2 Research Related on Self-construal 17
      • 2.2 Conversational Artificial Intelligence 19
      • 2.2.1 Artificial Intelligence 19
      • 2.2.2 Conversation Agent 20
      • 2.2.3 Research Related to Conversational AI 22
      • 2.3 Conversational AI Usage Intention 23
      • 2.3.1 The Concept of Intent to Use 23
      • 2.3.2 Research on the Conversational AI Usage Intention 25
      • 2.4 Mind Perception Theory 28
      • 2.4.1 The Concept of Mind Perception 28
      • 2.4.2 Relevant Research on Mind Perception 30
      • 2.5 Social Anxiety Theory 32
      • 2.5.1 The Concept of Social Anxiety 32
      • 2.5.2 Relevant Research on Social Anxiety 34
      • 2.6 Loneliness Theory 36
      • 2.6.1 The Concept of Loneliness 36
      • 2.6.2 Relevant Research on Loneliness 38
      • 2.7 Chapter Summary 40
      • Ⅲ. Theoretical Models and Hypothesis Development 43
      • 3.1 I-PACE Model 43
      • 3.2 Hypothetical Development 46
      • 3.2.1 Self-construal and Conversational AI 46
      • 3.2.2 The Mediating Role of Social Anxiety 48
      • 3.2.3 The Mediating Role of Loneliness 50
      • 3.2.4 The Moderating Role of Mind Perception 52
      • 3.3 Chapter Summary 54
      • IV. Empirical Research 56
      • 4.1 Operational Definition and Measurement of Variables 57
      • 4.1.1 Self-Construal Scale 57
      • 4.1.2 Social Anxiety Scale 58
      • 4.1.3 Loneliness Scale 59
      • 4.1.4 Mind Perception Scale 60
      • 4.1.5 Continue Use Intention Scale 60
      • 4.2 Questionnaire Design and Development 61
      • 4.3 Pre-Test 64
      • 4.3.1 Pre-Test Methods and Criteria 64
      • 4.3.2 Data Collection for Pre-Test 64
      • 4.3.3 Data Results of Pro-Test 64
      • 4.4 Chapter Summary 66
      • V. Statistical Analysis 68
      • 5.1 Data Collection 68
      • 5.1.1 Research Sample 68
      • 5.1.2 Processes and Methods 70
      • 5.2 Reliability Analysis 71
      • 5.3 Results and Discussion 73
      • 5.3.1 Manipulation Testing 73
      • 5.3.2 Hypothesis Testing 73
      • 5.3.3 Discussion 84
      • 5.4 Chapter Summary 85
      • Ⅵ. General Discussion 87
      • 6.1 Conclusions 87
      • 6.2 Theoretical Implications 91
      • 6.3 Managerial implications 94
      • 6.4 Limitations and Future Research 96
      • References 98
      • Appendix A. Self-Construal Manipulation in Study 117
      • Appendix B. Summary to Measures in Study 119
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. The intentional stance, Dennett, D. C., MIT press, , 1989

      2. Why people use chatbots, Brandtzaeg, P. B. and A. Følstad, Proceedings 4, , 2017

      3. Dimensions of mind perception., Gray, H. M. et al, 315(5812): 619-619, , 2007

      4. User experience-a research agenda., Hassenzahl, M. and, N. Tractinsky, Behaviour information technology 25(2): 91-97, , 2006

      5. Artificial intelligence in service., Huang, M.-H. and, R. T. Rust, 21(2): 155-172, , 2018

      6. Emotion and sociable humanoid robots, Breazeal, C., 59(1-2): 119-155, , 2003

      7. Theoretical approaches to loneliness., Perlman, D. and, L. A. Peplau, Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy 36: 123-134, , 1982

      8. Toward a social psychology of loneliness., L. A. Peplau, Perlman, D. and, Personal relationships 3: 31-56, , 1981

      9. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?, G. Woodruff, Premack, D. and, 1(4): 515-526, , 1978

      10. Artificial intelligence for the real world., R. Ronanki, Davenport, T. H. and, Harvard business review 96(1): 108-116, , 2018

      1. The intentional stance, Dennett, D. C., MIT press, , 1989

      2. Why people use chatbots, Brandtzaeg, P. B. and A. Følstad, Proceedings 4, , 2017

      3. Dimensions of mind perception., Gray, H. M. et al, 315(5812): 619-619, , 2007

      4. User experience-a research agenda., Hassenzahl, M. and, N. Tractinsky, Behaviour information technology 25(2): 91-97, , 2006

      5. Artificial intelligence in service., Huang, M.-H. and, R. T. Rust, 21(2): 155-172, , 2018

      6. Emotion and sociable humanoid robots, Breazeal, C., 59(1-2): 119-155, , 2003

      7. Theoretical approaches to loneliness., Perlman, D. and, L. A. Peplau, Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy 36: 123-134, , 1982

      8. Toward a social psychology of loneliness., L. A. Peplau, Perlman, D. and, Personal relationships 3: 31-56, , 1981

      9. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?, G. Woodruff, Premack, D. and, 1(4): 515-526, , 1978

      10. Artificial intelligence for the real world., R. Ronanki, Davenport, T. H. and, Harvard business review 96(1): 108-116, , 2018

      11. Mind perception is the essence of morality., Gray, K. et al, Psychological inquiry 23(2): 101-124, , 2012

      12. Feeling lonely? How about a companion robot?, Purcell, C., from https://www. irishtimes. com/life-and-style/health-family/feeling-lonely-how-about-a-companion-robot-1.2743857, , 2016

      13. Shyness and the pursuit of social acceptance., K. E. Buckley, Leary, M. and, Shyness: Development, consolidation and change: 139-153, , 2000

      14. Childrens materialism and identity development, Chaplin, L. N., et al, 434-447, , 2019

      15. Engaged to a robot? The role of AI in service., Huang, M.-H. and, R. T. Rust, 24(1): 30-41, , 2021

      16. Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions., Cacioppo, S. et al, Perspectives on Psychological Science 10(2): 238-249, , 2015

      17. Models of the self: self-construals and gender, L. Madson, Cross, S. E. and, Psychological bulletin 122(1): 5, , 1997

      18. Simulating history: The problem of contingency, Mandel, D. R., Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 3(1): 177-180, , 2003

      19. Emotional responses to interpersonal rejection., Leary, M. R., Dialogues in clinical neuroscience 17(4): 435-441, , 2015

      20. Message framing strategy for brand communication, Tsai, S.-P., 47(3): 364-377, , 2007

      21. The what, how, why, and where of self-construal., Cross, S. E. et al, 15(2): 142-179, , 2011

      22. Alexa prize—state of the art in conversational AI, Khatri, C., et al, 39(3): 40-55, , 2018

      23. A taxonomy of social cues for conversational agents., Feine, J. et al, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 132: 138-161, , 2019

      24. AI experience predicts identification with humankind., Wang, C. and, K. Peng, Behavioral Sciences 13(2): 89, , 2023

      25. Making conversations with chatbots more personalized., Shumanov, M. and, L. Johnson, Computers in Human Behavior 117: 106627, , 2021

      26. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness., Masi, C. M. et al, Personality and social psychology review 15(3): 219-266, , 2011

      27. On evaluating and comparing open domain dialog systems., Venkatesh, A. et al, arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.03625, , 2018

      28. Predicting consumer responses to a chatbot on Facebook., Zarouali, B. et al, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 21(8): 491-497, , 2018

      29. Social signal processing: Survey of an emerging domain., Vinciarelli, A. et al, Image and vision computing 27(12): 1743-1759, , 2009

      30. Style and Alignment in Information-Seeking Conversation, Thomas, P. et al, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction Retrieval. New Brunswick, NJ, USA, Association for Computing Machinery: 42–51, , 2018

      31. A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia., Rapee, R. M. and, R. G. Heimberg, 35(8): 741-756, , 1997

      32. HOW IS AI REGENERATING THE CONSUMER ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY?, Dabas, G., PC quest(1): 33, , 2020

      33. How do interactive voice assistants build brands loyalty?, Maroufkhani, P. et al, 183: 121870, , 2022

      34. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers., Nass, C. and, Y. Moon, 56(1): 81-103, , 2000

      35. On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism, Epley, N. et al, 114(4): 864, , 2007

      36. Consumer acceptance of smart speakers: a mixed methods approach, Kowalczuk, P., 12(4): 418-431, , 2018

      37. How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing., Davenport, T. et al, 48: 24-42, , 2020

      38. The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals, Singelis, T. M., Personality and social psychology bulletin 20(5): 580-591, , 1994

      39. Neural correlates of self-construal priming in the ultimatum game., Flinkenflogel, N. et al, Frontiers in Neuroscience 13: 454804, , 2019

      40. Loneliness: A theoretical review with implications for measurement., Marangoni, C. and, W. Ickes, 6(1): 93-128, , 1989

      41. Positive attitudes and negative expectations in lonely individuals., Bellucci, G., 10(1): 18595, , 2020

      42. Self-construal and forgiveness revisited: Replication and extension, Major, J. L. et al, 65(2): 170-188, , 2020

      43. Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands., Chung, M. et al, 117: 587-595, , 2020

      44. Special issue on conversational agents for healthcare and wellbeing., Kocaballi, A. B. et al, ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 12(2): 1-3, , 2022

      45. Chatbot advertising effectiveness: When does the message get through?, Van den Broeck, E. et al, Computers in Human Behavior 98: 150-157, , 2019

      46. Effect of social anxiety on the adoption of robotic training partner., Zhu, D. H. and, Z. Z. Deng, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 24(5): 343-348, , 2021

      47. Implicit Cognition and Addiction: Selected Recent Findings and Theory, Wiers, R. W. and, A. W. Stacy, The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Implicit Cognition: 282-299, , 2022

      48. A meta-analytic study of predictors for loneliness during adolescence., Mahon, N. E. et al, Nursing research 55(5): 308-315, , 2006

      49. Tools to create and democratize conversational artificial intelligence, Van Brummelen, J. J. R., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, , 2019

      50. Measuring consumer-perceived humanness of online organizational agents., Lu, L. et al, Computers in Human Behavior 128: 107092, , 2022

      51. Conversational Commerce, New Marketing Tactics, CX, Loyalty and Emotions, Purcarea, T., Romanian Distribution Committee Magazine 9(1): 30-39, , 2018

      52. Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale., Lu, L. et al, 80: 36-51, , 2019

      53. Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use, Caplan, S. E., 10(2): 234-242, , 2006

      54. Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley., D. M. Wegner, Gray, K. and, 125(1): 125-130, , 2012

      55. Loneliness in the modern age: an evolutionary theory of loneliness (ETL)., Cacioppo, J. T. et al, Advances in experimental social psychology 58: 127-197, , 2018

      56. Rejection sensitivity, social withdrawal, and loneliness in young adults., D. Nesdale, Watson, J. and, 42(8): 1984-2005, , 2012

      57. The impacts of self-construal and perceived risk on technology readiness., Choi, J. and, D. Yoo, 16(5): 1584-1597, , 2021

      58. AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance, Adam, M. et al, Electronic Markets 31(2): 427-445, , 2021

      59. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation., Markus, H. and, S. Kitayama, Psychological Review 98: 224-253, , 1991

      60. Brand Pride in Consumer-Brand Relationships: Towards a Conceptual Framework, Nandy, S. and, N. Sondhi, Global Business Review 23, , 2022

      61. Culture and egocentric perceptions of fairness in conflict and negotiation., Gelfand, M. J. et al, 87(5): 833, , 2002

      62. Turn-taking in conversational systems and human-robot interaction: a review., Skantze, G., Computer Speech Language 67: 101178, , 2021

      63. Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior., R. W. Wiers, Stacy, A. W. and, Annual review of clinical psychology 6: 551-575, , 2010

      64. Virtual humans elicit socially anxious interactants verbal self‐disclosure., J. Gratch, Kang, S. H. and, Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 21(3‐4): 473-482, , 2010

      65. Alexafying shoppers: The examination of Amazons captive relationship strategy., Ramadan, Z. B., 62: 102610, , 2021

      66. Cognitive neural mechanisms by which trait anxiety affects inhibitory control., Qi Senqing and, Li Hong, PhD Thesis, Chongqing: Southwest University, , 2014

      67. Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks., Čaić, M. et al, 29(2): 178-205, , 2018

      68. Consumer involvement with corporate ads vs product ads: a cross-national study., Ashraf, R. et al, 32(2): 322-342, , 2020

      69. Heres what people are really doing with their Alexa and Google Home assistants., Merritt, A., from https://venturebeat. com/2018/11/17/heres-what-peopleare-really-doing-with-their-alexa-and-google-home-assistants/, , 2018

      70. Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self., Trafimow, D. et al, 60(5): 649-655, , 1991

      71. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure., Russell, D. W., 66(1): 20-40, , 1996

      72. An analysis of self-construals, motivations, Facebook use, and user satisfaction, Kim, J. H. et al, Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 26(11-12): 1077-1099, , 2010

      73. Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction, Mellor, D. et al, 45(3): 213-218, , 2008

      74. Social and emotional loneliness: an examination of Weisss typology of loneliness, Russell, D., et al, 46(6): 1313, , 1984

      75. What will be the possible barriers to consumers adoption of smart home services?, Hong, A. et al, Telecommunications Policy 44(2): 101867, , 2020

      76. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness, Aron, A. et al, 63(4): 596, , 1992

      77. Design features of embodied conversational agents in eHealth: a literature review., Ter Stal, S. et al, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 138: 102409, , 2020

      78. Interventions for reducing loneliness: An umbrella review of intervention studies., Veronese, N. et al, Health social care in the community 29(5): e89-e96, , 2021

      79. The lonely century: how to restore human connection in a world thats pulling apart, Hertz, N., Crown Currency, , 2021

      80. The marketing of love: How attachment styles affect romantic consumption journeys., Mende, M. et al, 47: 255-273, , 2019

      81. My AI friend: How users of a social chatbot understand their human–AI friendship., Brandtzaeg, P. B. et al, 48(3): 404-429, , 2022

      82. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle., Waytz, A. et al, 52: 113-117, , 2014

      83. The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis., Varnum, M. E. et al, 19(1): 9-13, , 2010

      84. Meet Xiaoice, the AI chatbot lover dispelling the loneliness of Chinas city dwellers, Gaubert, J., from https://www. euronews. com/next/2021/08/26/meet-xiaoice-the-ai-chatbot-lover-dispelling-the-loneliness-of-china-s-city-dwellers, , 2021

      85. Differences and similarities between compulsive buying and other addictive behaviors., Mestre-Bach, G. et al, 4: 228-236, , 2017

      86. Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot., Scassellati, B. et al, Science Robotics 3(21): eaat7544, , 2018

      87. Loneliness from young adulthood to old age: Explaining age differences in loneliness., Hawkley, L. C. et al, 46(1): 39-49, , 2022

      88. The feeling economy: Managing in the next generation of artificial intelligence (AI)., Huang, M.-H. et al, California Management Review 61(4): 43-65, , 2019

      89. Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms., Hawkley, L. C. and, J. T. Cacioppo, 40(2): 218-227, , 2010

      90. Managing the human–chatbot divide: how service scripts influence service experience., Sands, S. et al, 32(2): 246-264, , 2021

      91. Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology., Blascovich, J. et al, Psychological inquiry 13(2): 103-124, , 2002

      92. Social anxiety and internet use–A meta-analysis: What do we know? What are we missing?, Prizant-Passal, S. et al, Computers in Human Behavior 62: 221-229, , 2016

      93. The Growth of E-Commerce, Disruptive Technologies and Marketers Conversational Strategy., Purcarea, I.-M., Romanian Distribution Committee Magazine 12(2): 33-43, , 2021

      94. The effects of numerical divisibility on loneliness perceptions and consumer preferences., Yan, D. and, J. Sengupta, 47(5): 755-771, , 2021

      95. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, Davis, F. D., 319-340, , 1989

      96. Potential applications of social robots in robot-assisted interventions for social anxiety, Rasouli, S. et al, 14(5): 1-32, , 2022

      97. Conversational artificial intelligence-demystifying statistical vs linguistic NLP solutions, Panesar, K., 4(1): 47-79, , 2020

      98. Human-like communication in conversational agents: a literature review and research agenda., Van Pinxteren, M. M. et al, 31(2): 203-225, , 2020

      99. Interactive effects of perceived social exclusion and self-construal on recycling behavior., Zhou, N. et al, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 45(3): 491-503, , 2017

      100. Is chatting with a sophisticated chatbot as good as chatting online or FTF with a stranger?, Drouin, M. et al, Computers in Human Behavior 128: 107100, , 2022

      101. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people., Reeves, B. and, C. Nass, Cambridge, UK 10(10), , 1996

      102. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation., Baumeister, R. F. and, M. R. Leary, Interpersonal development: 57-89, , 2017

      103. Artificial intelligence (ai) powered conversational system for identifying malicious messages, Benishti, E., Google Patents, , 2021

      104. The analysis of customer satisfaction factors which influence chatbot acceptance in Indonesia., Sanny, L. et al, 10(6): 1225-1232, , 2020

      105. Consumer financial distress during economic downturn: evidence from five provinces of Zimbabwe., R. K. Chamboko, Chamboko, R. and, 47(9): 1123-1142, , 2020

      106. Effects of mindfulness meditation interventions on depression in older adults: A meta-analysis., Reangsing, C. et al., 25(7): 1181-1190, , 2021

      107. Whos driving this conversation? Systematic biases in the content of online consumer discussions, Hamilton, R. W. et al, 54(4): 540-555, , 2017

      108. Self-construal and Facebook activities: Exploring differences in social interaction orientation., Chang, C., Computers in Human Behavior 53: 91-101, , 2015

      109. Consumer trust and perceived risk for voice-controlled artificial intelligence: The case of Siri., Hasan, R. et al, 131: 591-597, , 2021

      110. Genetic contributions to loneliness and their relevance to the evolutionary theory of loneliness., Spithoven, A. W. et al, Perspectives on Psychological Science 14(3): 376-396, , 2019

      111. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses, Oyserman, D. et al, Psychological bulletin 128(1): 3, , 2002

      112. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies., Hughes, M. E. et al, Research on aging 26(6): 655-672, , 2004

      113. Shifting selves and decision making: The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking., Mandel, N., 30(1): 30-40, , 2003

      114. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety, Mattick, R. P. and, J. C. Clarke, Behaviour research and therapy 36(4): 455-470, , 1998

      115. Culture, ethnicity, and emotional distress measures: The role of self-construal and self-enhancement., S. M. Kalick, Norasakkunkit, V. and, 33(1): 56-70, , 2002

      116. Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions, Go, E. and, S. S. Sundar, 97: 304-316, , 2019

      117. Investigating the Different Roles of the Factors Affecting Ethically Questionable Consumer Behaviour., Pop, C.-M. et al, Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics: 53-61, , 2019

      118. Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words., Pittman, M. and, B. Reich, Computers in Human Behavior 62: 155-167, , 2016

      119. Human versus chatbot: Understanding the role of emotion in health marketing communication for vaccines., Tsai, W. H. S. et al, 38(12): 2377-2392, , 2021

      120. Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot., Ho, A. et al, 68(4): 712-733, , 2018

      121. Speaking vs. listening? Balance conversation attributes of voice assistants for better voice marketing., Hu, P. et al, Extended abstract 9: pp. 2019, , 2019

      122. Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study., Nadarzynski, T. et al, Digital Health 5: 1-12, , 2019

      123. How do people react to AI failure? Automation bias, algorithmic aversion, and perceived controllability., Jones-Jang, S. M. and, Y. J. Park, 28(1): zmac029, , 2023

      124. How smart experiences build service loyalty: The importance of consumer love for smart voice assistants., Hernandez‐Ortega, B. and, I. Ferreira, Psychology Marketing 38(7): 1122-1139, , 2021

      125. Intelligent conversational agents in mental healthcare services: a thematic analysis of user perceptions, Prakash, A. V. and, S. Das, Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems 12(2): 1, , 2020

      126. Personalization and personality: Some effects of customizing message style based on consumer personality, Moon, Y., 12(4): 313-325, , 2002

      127. Intergroup conflicts: When interdependent individuals feel less dialectical than independent individuals., Lu, M. et al, Personality and Individual Differences 105: 150-157, , 2017

      128. My smart speaker is cool! Perceived coolness, perceived values, and users attitude toward smart speakers., Ashfaq, M. et al, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37(6): 560-573, , 2021

      129. Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives., Barrick, M. R. et al, 87(1): 43, , 2002

      130. Hey Alexa… examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants., McLean, G. and, K. Osei-Frimpong, 99: 28-37, , 2019

      131. An empirical study on anthropomorphism and engagement with disembodied AIs and consumers re‐use behavior., Moriuchi, E., Psychology Marketing 38(1): 21-42, , 2021

      132. Individuality or conformity? The effect of independent and interdependent self-concepts on public judgments, Torelli, C. J, 16(3): 240-248, , 2006

      133. Self-focused attention affects subsequent processing of positive (but not negative) performance appraisals., D. P. Valentiner, Holzman, J. B. and, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 50: 295-302, , 2016

      134. Relationship between social robot proactive behavior and the human perception of anthropomorphic attributes., Tan, H. et al, Advanced Robotics 34(20): 1324-1336, , 2020

      135. Human-agent and human-robot interaction theory: Similarities to and differences from human-human interaction., Krämer, N. C. et al, Human-computer interaction: The agency perspective: 215-240, , 2012

      136. I value freedom, but we value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment., Gardner, W. L. et al, 10(4): 321-326, , 1999

      137. Linking loneliness, shyness, smartphone addiction symptoms, and patterns of smartphone use to social capital., Bian, M. and, L. Leung, 33(1): 61-79, , 2015

      138. Learning from the Dark Web: leveraging conversational agents in the era of hyper-privacy to enhance marketing., Thomaz, F. et al, 48: 43-63, , 2020

      139. A study of the impact of online reviews on brand word-of-mouth communication from a self-construal perspective., Wu Dan and, Wei Wei, Business and Economic Research (16): 98-101, , 2022

      140. Alexa, shes not human but… Unveiling the drivers of consumers trust in voice‐based artificial intelligence., Pitardi, V. and, H. R. Marriott, Psychology Marketing 38(4): 626-642, , 2021

      141. Smartphones as attachment targets: an attachment theory framework for understanding problematic smartphone use., Parent, N. et al, 42(9): 7567-7578, , 2023

      142. The effect of social anxiety on mobile phone dependence among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model., Kong, F. et al, Children and Youth Services Review 108: 104517, , 2020

      143. You are not alone: A serial mediation of social attraction, privacy concerns, and satisfaction in voice AI use., Choi, T. R. and, J. H. Choi, Behavioral Sciences 13(5): 431, , 2023

      144. I seek pleasures and we avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion., A. Y. Lee, Aaker, J. L. and, 28(1): 33-49, , 2001

      145. OK, Google, why do I use you? Motivations, post-consumption evaluations, and perceptions of voice AI assistants., Choi, T. R. and, M. E. Drumwright, Telematics and Informatics 62: 101628, , 2021

      146. Insightful Assistant: AI-compatible Operation Graph Representations for Enhancing Industrial Conversational Agents, Bayrak, B. et al, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.12929, , 2020

      147. User experience: A concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners perspectives through an international survey., Lallemand, C. et al, Computers in Human Behavior 43: 35-48, , 2015

      148. Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions., Lim, M. H. et al, Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology 55: 793-810, , 2020

      149. A roadmap to rumination: A review of the definition, assessment, and conceptualization of this multifaceted construct., Smith, J. M. and, L. B. Alloy, Clinical psychology review 29(2): 116-128, , 2009

      150. Social anxiety as a moderator in consumer willingness to accept AI assistants based on utilitarian and hedonic values., Yuan, C. et al, 65: 102878, , 2022

      151. Exploring conversation topics in conversational artificial intelligence–based social mediated communities of practice., Ng, Y.-L. and, Z. Lin, Computers in Human Behavior 134: 107326, , 2022

      152. Influence of social anxiety on peoples preferences for robots as daily life communication partners among young Japanese., Suzuki, T. et al, Japanese Psychological Research 64(3): 343-350, , 2022

      153. Does the type of receptacle influence the crossmodal association between colour and flavour? A cross-cultural comparison., Wan, X. et al, Flavour 3: 1-7, , 2014

      154. Perceiving a mind in a chatbot: effect of mind perception and social cues on co-presence, closeness, and intention to use., Lee, S. et al, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36(10): 930-940, , 2020

      155. The human side of human-chatbot interaction: A systematic literature review of ten years of research on text-based chatbots., Rapp, A. et al, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 151: 102630, , 2021

      156. The influence of prior expectations of a robots lifelikeness on users intentions to treat a zoomorphic robot as a companion., S. B. Allouch, de Graaf, M. M. A. and, 9: 17-32, , 2017

      157. Robots are friends as well as foes: Ambivalent attitudes toward mindful and mindless AI robots in the United States and China., L. Liu, Dang, J. and, Computers in Human Behavior 115: 106612, , 2021

      158. The role of self-construal in consumers electronic word of mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites: A social cognitive approach, Doohwang, et al., 28(3): 1054-1062, , 2012

      159. Understanding consumers acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption., E. Oliveira, Fernandes, T. and, 122: 180-191, , 2021

      160. What (de) motivates customers to use AI-powered conversational agents for shopping? The extended behavioral reasoning perspective, Jan, I. U. et al, 75: 103440, , 2023

      161. When sadness comes alive, will it be less painful? The effects of anthropomorphic thinking on sadness regulation and consumption., Chen, F. et al, 30(2): 277-295, , 2020

      162. The AI-extended consumer: technology, consumer, country differences in the formation of demand for AI-empowered consumer products., Frank, B. et al, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172: 121018, , 2021

      163. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: a comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats., Fresco, D. et al, 31(6): 1025-1035, , 2001

      164. A multilevel analysis of the self-presentation theory of social anxiety: Contextualized, dispositional, and interactive perspectives, Catalino, L. I. et al, 46(4): 361-373, , 2012

      165. Examining the psychological process of developing consumer-brand relationships through strategic use of social media brand chatbots., Lin, J.-S. E. and, L. Wu, 140: 107488, , 2023

      166. Effects of cultural background on consumer perception and acceptability of foods and drinks: A review of latest cross-cultural studies., Jeong, S. and, J. Lee, 42: 248-256, , 2021

      167. Das I-PACE Modell zur Beschreibung der Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung von internetbezogenen Störungen und anderen Verhaltenssüchten., M. Brand, Antons, S. and, Suchttherapie 20(04): 185-191, , 2019

      168. Siri, Siri, in my hand: Whos the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence, M. Haenlein, Kaplan, A. and, Business horizons 62(1): 15-25, , 2019

      169. Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: The role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat., Hackel, L. M. et al, 52: 15-23, , 2014

      170. The mediating role of rumination in the relationship between loneliness and depression in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic., Luttenbacher, I. et al, COVID 1(2): 447-457, , 2021

      171. Social exclusion predicts impaired self‐regulation: A 2‐year longitudinal panel study including the transition from preschool to school., Stenseng, F. et al, 83(2): 212-220, , 2015

      172. Bots vs. humans: how schema congruity, contingency-based interactivity, and sympathy influence consumer perceptions and patronage intentions., Lou, C. et al, 41(4): 655-684, , 2022

      173. Depression and social anxiety in relation to problematic TikTok use severity: the mediating role of boredom proneness and distress intolerance., Yao, N. et al, 145: 107751, , 2023

      174. Experiential avoidance in idiographic, autobiographical memories: Construct validity and links to social anxiety, depressive, and anger symptoms, Kashdan, T. B. et al, 24(5): 528-534, , 2010

      175. Speaking of purchases: How conversational potential determines consumers willingness to exert effort for experiential versus material purchases., Bastos, W., 50(1): 1-16, , 2020

      176. Do lonely people seek robot companionship? A comparative examination of the Loneliness–Robot anthropomorphism link in the United States and China, L. Liu, Dang, J. and, Computers in Human Behavior 141: 107637, , 2023

      177. Seeing the mind of robots: Harm augments mind perception but benevolent intentions reduce dehumanisation of artificial entities in visual vignettes., Küster, D. and, A. Swiderska, 56(3): 454-465, , 2021

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼