RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      지각된 신뢰성의 역할: 인간과 AI 에이전트 선택에서 서비스 영역의 상호작용 효과 = The Role of Perceived Reliability: Moderating Effect of Service Domain on Human versus AI Agent Selection

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109953564

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the adoption of AI agents has been expanding across various service domains. However, understanding of when and why users prefer human or AI agents remains limited. This study aimed to examine the moderating effect of service domain on user preferences between human and AI agents and the mediating role of perceived reliability. The results showed that in healthcare services, intention to use human agents was significantly higher than toward AI agents, while in financial services, intention to use AI agents was significantly higher than toward human agents. Furthermore, human agents were perceived as more reliable in healthcare services, whereas AI agents were perceived as more reliable in financial services. Mediation analysis revealed that perceived reliability mediated the effect of the interaction between agent type and service domain on users' intention to use. These findings demonstrate that users prioritize relational reliability of humans in healthcare services where empathy and clinical experience are crucial, while prioritizing analytical reliability of AI in financial services where accuracy and objectivity are important. This confirms the significance of service domain roles in human-AI interaction. The study is expected to provide meaningful practical implications for establishing differentiated AI adoption strategies based on service characteristics and improving user perceptions of reliability.
      번역하기

      With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the adoption of AI agents has been expanding across various service domains. However, understanding of when and why users prefer human or AI agents remains limited. This study aime...

      With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the adoption of AI agents has been expanding across various service domains. However, understanding of when and why users prefer human or AI agents remains limited. This study aimed to examine the moderating effect of service domain on user preferences between human and AI agents and the mediating role of perceived reliability. The results showed that in healthcare services, intention to use human agents was significantly higher than toward AI agents, while in financial services, intention to use AI agents was significantly higher than toward human agents. Furthermore, human agents were perceived as more reliable in healthcare services, whereas AI agents were perceived as more reliable in financial services. Mediation analysis revealed that perceived reliability mediated the effect of the interaction between agent type and service domain on users' intention to use. These findings demonstrate that users prioritize relational reliability of humans in healthcare services where empathy and clinical experience are crucial, while prioritizing analytical reliability of AI in financial services where accuracy and objectivity are important. This confirms the significance of service domain roles in human-AI interaction. The study is expected to provide meaningful practical implications for establishing differentiated AI adoption strategies based on service characteristics and improving user perceptions of reliability.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼