건축물의 하자와 도급인의 위자료청구권 - 일본 판례의 분석을 중심으로 = The Defect of Building and Consolation Money Claim of Contractor - Focusing on the Analysis of Precedent in Japan -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  This thesis examines the problems about a contracting contract, and futhermore a consolation money claim in a building contracting contract on the basis of whether the consolation money claim is admitted or not in case of an obligation default.<BR>  In detail, this thesis studies that employer could claim a damage compensation for mental anguish as well as for property as a defect mortgage responsibility in case there are leakage, cracked, inclined, sinkage, and so on in the building which the contractor has contracted, and also investigates, which factors make the consolation money admitted, that is, the consideration reasons and calculation factors for calculation the consolation money.<BR>  According to the precedent, It is generally accepted that the employer’s mental anguish could be recovered by requiring the defect or compensating the damage equivalent. However the damage through defect building, especially defect house, has a special characteristic that could not be solved by recovering its property value, and also it could be mental shock to orderer or buyer by frustrating dreams they want to have their own house, simultaneously.<BR>  It is also infringement on calm, comfortable and safe inhabitation, furthermore the damage is serious and continuous.<BR>  The damage of defect house could not be recovered only by compensating the property because the defect house infringe the personal profit and life profit.<BR>  Futhermore, If there is negligence in the process of construction or supervision, it is considered to be infringement and obligation default.<BR>  It would be factors of in creasing consolation money in case of being problem in response denying the defect and avoiding the responsibility as temporary compensation with negligence the process of construction.<BR>  In this reason, negative theory of consolation money that moral anguish could be recovered only by compensating property including repairing money, rebuilding cost, and more cost has basically problems.<BR>  In general, the recovery of property damage only legal effect to be realized and considered naturally as a orderer or buyer who has the right to acquire the perfect house, thus the consolation money should be increased in case of extension of damage and malignancy of infringement.<BR>  The defect house damage would be infringement of safe and comfortable inhabitation right and breaking the dreams, so it is necessary to set up the damage theory appropriate to the lawsuit.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
  Ⅱ. 채무불이행에서의 위자료청구권의 인정법리
  Ⅲ. 일본의 도급건축물의 하자로 인한 위자료청구권
  Ⅳ. 결론
  【참고문헌】
  [Abstract]
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "프랑스에서의 건축수급인 등의 하자담보책임법의 변천" 한국비교사법학회 12 (12): 2005.9

2 "프랑스법에서의 건축수급인의 하자담보책임" 한양법학회 14 : 2003

3 "책임원인에 따른 비재산적 손해에 대한 배상과 위자료" (27) : 2005

4 "채무불이행에 있어서 위자료청구권에 관한 일고찰" 6 (6): 1999

5 "수진기회상실론-일본의 판례 및 학설 발전으로부터의 시사" 22 (22): 2006

6 "수급인이 신축한 건물에 하자가 있는 경우 도급인의 위자료청구권-대법원 1993 선고 93다19115판결-" 1994

7 "수급인의 하자담보책임에 관한 연구" 2001

8 "수급인의 중과실책임-서울지방법원 위자료판결의 법리구성" 1996

9 "소유권침해와 위자료청구권-통세 판례에 대한 비판적 고찰- 고려대학교 법학연구원 판례연구" 1986

10 "민법주해〔ⅩⅣ〕" 박영사 (7) : 1999

11 "고의의 채무불이행책임-서울지법 판결 고시연구 1991년 4월호"

12 "건축도급계약상의 해제권에 관한 연혁적 고찰-일본민법 제635조 단서에 관한 논의를 중심으로" 13 (13): 2006